Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

C&P Labs


25Unifrom50

Recommended Posts

I have a C&P scheduled for Labs this month with an outside contractor, can any one tell me what is the purpose of the blood work and why couldn't they use the Labs from my recent visit to the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Lead Moderator

C and P "Labs" can be used to award or deny service connection...they are evidence.  Example:  "Labs" can confirm or rule out Diabetis, Hep C, and a bunch of other disorders.  

The "labs" from your recent visit "could" be used, but those "labs" may or may not be the right "labs".  

The term "labs" is a very broad term meaning any one of a number of laboratory tests including blood work, urinalysis, and more.  

Even among "labs"  specific to  blood work, your last set of labs may or may not have included a test for Hep C, for example, as hep c is often not tested unless specifically requested.  

Relax:  Confirming (or denial) of a diagnosis with labs is a good thing.  

You dont have anything to worry about unless you are, well, partaking of substances for recreational use that are not authorized.  

Even if your blood test shows evidence of alcohol, for example, this does not mean that your SC will be denied because of alcohol use/abuse.  

The VA has specific criteria for service connection, and for rating service connected disorders.  

And, there is only one example of alcohol abuse that will get you denied:  "Willfull misconduct".  

Willfull misconduct is a statement of fact made at the time of your in service event.  

For example, I was injured in service which resulted in a leg fracture.  My doctor specifically stated that my injury was "not due to willful misconduct".  

However, lets try another example.  Let's say you get drunk on duty, and get into an automobile accident in service.  The doctor who treats you notes that you had significant alcohol in your blood at the time of injury.  Then , the doctor COULD decide that your injury was due to your own "willful miscondcut" and you probably wont be service connected for injuries related to you drinking and driving on duty.  

On the other hand, if a Veteran has PTSD and self medicates with alcohol, this is "probably" not willful misconduct.  Again, that is a factual determination made by the doctor who treats you.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Broncovet,

My only concern is, I don't take my Meds as I should, mainly because of the side effects and discomfort they cause. Is it possible that the frequency of how I take them would show up on the radar and  could it play a vital part in the decision process?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

Dont worry about it.  Is it your fault that the "side effects" of meds make them intolerable?  Nowhere in the "rating criteria" does it say anything about making doctor prescribed meds mandantory.  

Even the doctors understand that there is a reasonable chance that you wont be compliant with your meds, for multiple reasons.  

I dont always take my meds because I forget!  I have also expressed this to my doctors on multiple occassions.  If the benefits of taking the medications dont outweigh the negatives, then dont take them and tell your doctor why.  

Your disabilities will be rated on "symptoms" not on what kinds of meds you take, and whether or not you take them.  Medications dont work for everyone..some are worse than nothing.  

If you discontinue a medication I suggest you inform your doctor, and the reasons why.  He may try some other form of treatment.  Medications, in this country, are not mandantory, but are prescribed for the good of the patient.  Who is more qualifed to determine if these meds help you or not rather than you??  

Be honest at the c and p exam, but when he asks, "how are you?" you should tell him how you felt on your worst day.  If you feel good the day of the exam, but on thursday you had a fight with your wife and the police were called, then tell them that!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use