Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

aggravation of SC by non SC

Rate this question


pwrslm

Question

I have tried to find the answer to this, no success.

I have a SC left leg/radiculopathy caused by SC spine condition.

I also have diabetes type II thats not SC.

The SC leg was a no brainer secondary to spine, and symptoms were cut and dried, and no improvement.

Along come my DMII with polyneuropathy (not SC), superimposed over my existing radiculopathy (SC), and it makes my leg worse (aggravation).

No other symptoms from the DMII polyneuropathy exist on right leg, or either arm. 

The question is, is the increased disability of the left leg allowed, or will the VA deny an increase for the worsened symptoms?

Edited by pwrslm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

How about posting a redacted copy of your Leg Secondary Award Letter? When is the last time the leg was examined by a Med/Ortho Specialist? Are you talking Pain or Range of Motion?

File for the Secondary Increase, that's the only way to know for sure.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Ok, if your service connected condition gets worse, then apply for an increase.  Once service connected, always service connected (unless VA does a "severance" of service connection, and they must follow the applicable rules to do that).  

I would not suggest you apply for an increase of a service connected condition secondary to a nsc condition.  As alex once said, you are either service connected or not.  Its like being pregnant.  You cant be "a little" pregnant.  You are or you are not.  However, you can "get over" being pregnant, but once service connected always sc, (with the exception of a severance).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Va knows service connected conditions often worsen over time.  That is why you can file for an increase. 

You need only document worsening symptoms of your sc condition, dont worry about what caused your worsening symptoms..that has already been decided when you were awarded SC. 

The procudure for an increase is much easier than for service connection.  There is no need to document an in service event, a nexus, or a diagnosis, as you already had those to get SC the first time.  Just document worsened symptoms.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Here ya go Gastone

What We Decided
We made the following decision(s):
Issue/Con ten ti on Percent (%) Continued
left lower extremity radiculopathy, claimed as 40%
partial paralysis sciatic nerve left leg and left
foot drop
Explanation
• The evaluation of left lower extremity radiculopathy, claimed as partial paralysis sciatic
nerve left leg and left foot drop is continued as 40 percent disabling.
• Since there is a likelihood of improvement, the assigned evaluation is not considered
permanent and is subject to a future review examination.
• We have assigned a 40 percent evaluation for your left lower extremity radiculopathy
( claimed as partial paralysis sciatic nerve left leg and left foot drop) based on: • Moderately
severe incomplete paralysis
• A higher evaluation of 60 percent is not warranted for paralysis of the sciatic nerve unless
the evidence shows nerve damage is severe with marked muscular atrophy.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

File a nod timely if you dispute this decision.  Best is if you "refute" the VA's "reasons and bases" with actual  evidence.  For example, if you feel you meet the criteria for 60 percent, then cite your doctors opinion as to when he said you (met the criteria).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hya Broncovet,

I have a recent EMG and NCV from a non VA neurologist that shows atrophy and no deep tendon response in my ankles and only trace knee jerks in both knee's. Decreased strength in both legs, worse on left than right. I have documented that the axon nerve degeneration in my left leg is getting worse through both emg and ncv. The nerves were already damaged before the diabetic neuropathy began, and is attacking my left leg much worse because of the pre-existing damage (my opinion). There is no increase in any other extremity due to the Diabetic neuropathy.

I cant find anything like this in the VBA, CVA or the M21-1. The boys at the VA 800 Peggy line have no clue. That's why I am looking here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use