Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

bad letter please help.

Rate this question


paulcolrain

Question

ok so this letter states,

do to your current ongoing appeal issues it has been determined that your claim for increase is premature. we will not be able to to adjudicate this claim until the appeal has been finished.

ok seems like it would make sense. BUT,

the claimed issues are for an increase.

the increase is do to the BVA issuing a grant of service connection for then stated that is far as they can go they can not rate.

the increase is do to the fact that the RO granted only 10% and i believe it should be higher as of august 2017 but gave me EED of 2009.

they recieved my claim for increase in march of 2018 then sent me to a C + P this month.

then they send this letter saying its premature.

? how is it premature when these issues are NOT under appeal? 

the only issues under appeal are for EED of the back and EED of the radiculopathy and increase of the radiculopathy. 

now, radiculopathy is from the lumbar nerve NOT from the hips.

any Thoughts here? they just stopped my claim and blamed it on a non issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

PC, are you handling all your Appeal and Claims filings on your own, without advisory assistance from a VSO Rep? That might be the problem, filing for Increases that might touch on non-adjudicated Appeal issues, is somewhat a waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

hoping i can answer both your questions in one answer. but you will have more questions because i ahure do.

i do not have an un adjudicated appeal for the hips.

the hips where decided and i received a grant of service connection for them. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

ill also add that on the decision letter i recieved in August of 2017 does state " this is to be considered a full grand of benefits and this issue on appeal is now final and closed"

so then i ask for increase and im told its still pending... FOLKS ITS NOT STILL PENDING.

I ALSO WANT TO ADD TO ALL NEWBIES THAT WONDER WHY STRANGE THINGS HAPPEN ON EBENE & VET.GOV...... PLEASE DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND CALL 800-827-1000 IMMEDIATELY!!!! DO NOT LISTEN TO POSTS THAT STATE EBENE'S IS WRONG JUST WAIT FOR A LETTER...NO NO NO.... CALL AND STATE YOUR CONCERN ... YOU WILL GET ANSWERS NOW IN 2018 

Edited by paulcolrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use