Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Effective Date Error a CUE?

Rate this question


EODCMC

Question

I will be simple and brief unless more specifics are asked of me:

May 2, 2016 - I received a SC disability letter for Dermatitis at 10%. This was retroactive with an Effective Date of March 1, 2017.

Subsequently, during one of my regular visits to VA Dermatology I questioned the VA Dermatologist (specialist) on the % of my body that was affected. She put in my notes (My Health Vet) that it affected more than 60%. Additionally, I had a C&P exam for sun damage and actinic keratosis (AK). The examiner put on the DBQ that more than 40% of my body was affected by Dermatitis. 

Feb 9, 2018, I submitted a Reconsideration to increase the original assessment from 10% to 60%. I was and still am within a year of that decision.The VA sat on this, presumably because they were going to lump this with the Sun Damage and AK. Not so! 

Apr 10, 2018 - I emailed my VSO a filled out NOD for submission. She asked me to hold off and see if there was something internally that she could do to move this along. I reminded her that MAY 2 was my deadline. 

Apr 25, 2018 - I told her to submit the NOD.

Apr 26, 2018 - She sent me the following e-mail:

----------------- "Just wanted to check in with you b/c the VA made a decision on your claims! The VA increased your rating of dermatitis to 60% effective February 9, 2018. The left and right lower extremity radiculopathy were both granted at 10%. You are now rated at 100% permanent and total. The VA will be sending you the rating decision in the mail shortly. Please review it carefully and let me know if you have any questions."

I thanked her, but yesterday I sent the following:

"I just noticed the effective date you indicated on your previous e-mail concerning the Reconsideration for increased rating of Dermatitis. Shouldn't this be March 1, 2017? That's not a small amount of retroactive dollars. As you are aware, I am at the 12th hour concerning a NOD, should that become necessary. 

I could see this date of Feb 9, 2018 being the effective date of the bi-lateral radiculopathy.

Please advise, should we still submit the NOD for Dermatitis? We could always cancel it if everything looks fair when I received the formal package.

FYI, I have seen no change on E-benefits nor Vets.gov."

My questions:

  • Am I correct?
  • Can they say they Reopened the Dermatitis claim? My understanding is they cannot Reopen a claim until after a year since the decision.
  • Do you think they are dragging their feet until after May 2 when the year would have passed to save a couple thousand dollars in retro?
  • It feels like a backroom deal between the RO and my VSO
  • I plan to get the NOD in with or without my VSO on Monday May1.
  • If this thing goes south for any reaso, including retribution, do I have a case for a CUE?

Ha...This wasn't as brief as I thought it would be. Your help is greatly appreciated.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Dont file a Cue, file a nod (timely) instead.  Its easier to prove a nod, than a cue.  (The cue standard of review is a higher standard of review.  

I think you should dispute BOTH decisions.  One, dispute the disability percentage, and in the most recent one, dispute the effective date.  

VSO's are often very liberal about giving away our money, but see if they are so liberal at giving YOU their money!  

In virtually all cases, its better to file a nod than a cue.  Cue is for when you discover the error AFTER the one year appeal period.  

NOD BEFORE A YEAR AND CUE AFTER A YEAR.  

Now, Berta has had good luck "asking the VA to cue themselves" with a claim still in the appeal period.  While this sometimes works, she will admit that you should STILL file a nod within the one year appeal period.  

You can file a cue anytime, but you can only file a (successful) nod within a year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Please advise, should we still submit the NOD for Dermatitis? We could always cancel it if everything looks fair when I received the formal package.

FYI, I have seen no change on E-benefits nor Vets.gov."

  • "Am I correct?" Yes, as Broncovet advised, get the NOD in on time and get proof of mailing. BUT *****
  • "Can they say they Reopened the Dermatitis claim? My understanding is they cannot Reopen a claim until after a year since the decision." I dont see how they could" re-open a claim that is technically still in progress because of the new evidence -that warranted the 60%
  • "Do you think they are dragging their feet until after May 2 when the year would have passed to save a couple thousand dollars in retro?" Possibly=they tied that BS on me once.
  • "It feels like a backroom deal between the RO and my VSO" Yeah, maybe ,but  maybe not---
  • I plan to get the NOD in with or without my VSO on Monday May1.
  • If this thing goes south for any reaso, including retribution, do I have a case for a CUE?
  • Most probably YES!

******This was a reconsideration and with reconsiderations they used to only give the one year NOD deadline but that changed and I posted the new regulation here about 2 years ago---

You can also appeal the Reconsideration decision.

I also posted it recently -per this post-but link  didnt work- I will try to link it again....

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Here is the March 2015 change to the way ROs handle Recon requests:

https://community.hadit.com/forums/topic/61898-official-request-for-reconsideration-at-varo-level/

I interpret this all to mean that the NOD deadline is extended to one year after the Recon Request is decided....because you can appeal the Recon Request decision.

I posted this elsewhere but Carlie posted it too , above.

My point is that you might not need to file a NOD yet-based on above, M21-1MR change, but you can always withdraw it- better to be safe than sorry----

This is the part I mean:

But the entire M21-1MR change has to be read.

 

"Change Date

March 24, 2015

a.  Definition:  Request for Reconsideration

For the purpose of this topic, a request for reconsideration is a request from a claimant for the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to reconsider one of its decisions that has not yet become final (the one-year appeal period, which begins on the date the claimant was notified of the decision at issue, has not yet expired)."

I wou;d be grateful for any opinions on this Change.

 

A request for reconsideration differs from a claim to reopen in that the decision at issue in a claim to reopen has become final.

 

Reference:  For more information about claims to reopen a finally denied claim, see M21-1, Part III, Subpart ii, 2.E."

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I said probably a Yes on any potential CUE-but that would depend on what the VA knew and when they knew it.

If the VA had in their possession, establlished medical evidence that warranted the 60% at time of the 10% award,and yet only awarded the lower  rating ,they committed a CUE by violating 38 CFR 4.6. But often VA uses a C & P exam date as the EED and sometimes that date is wrong re: the actual EED.

Wow :

"VA increased your rating of dermatitis to 60% effective February 9, 2018. The left and right lower extremity radiculopathy were both granted at 10%. You are now rated at 100% permanent and total." So far so good but I hope that decision comes soon so that you have documentation of it ASAP.

Does the Feb 2018 date correspond to a C & P exam  you had prior to the one they gave you that garnered the 10%?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks Berta, I fully understand your advice.

The Dermatologist report and DBQ happened a couple of months after the original decision for 10%.The original decision SC me for Dermatitis at 10% was based on a C&P exam that included many claims combined. He never did an inspection of my condition unclothed. In fact, he didn't even ask me to roll up my sleeves.

 

41 minutes ago, Berta said:

Does the Feb 2018 date correspond to a C & P exam  you had prior to the one they gave you that garnered the 10%?

No, it only corresponds to the date I submitted the Reconsideration. I think they may have looked at it as a NEW CLAIM. The only way I could submit it electronically was to open a claim and attach a 21-4138 with the following verbiage:

" I respectfully request Reconsideration to correct your Dermatitis decision effective Mar 1, 2017. On the decision letter dated May 2, 2017, I was rated at 10% based on "less than 20% of the entire body affected". My VA Deramatologist (Specialist) report of Jan 6, 2018 and a recent DBQ dated Feb 2, 2018 differ with that opinion. The Dermatologist opines that more than 60% and the C&P examiner has an opinion of more than 40% of my entire body is affected by Dermatitis. Additionally, I am prescribed antihistamine medication, topical steroids and quarterly PDT (UVA) for Dermatitis."

If, by mistake, they opened this as a NEW CLAIM, they should have closed the NEW Claim and combined with other open claims and it would be recorded. My Reconsideration request was seemingly ingnored. No mention, no documentation that they even received it. Not until my VSO sent me the e-mail that it was increased with a Feb 9, effective date. And again, how can they start a NEW CLAIM when I am still within the 1 year threshold for the same condition?

Edited by EODCMC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use