Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

2nd attempt- FDC Rhinitis Increase, Secondary OSA, Sinusitis, and Hypertension

Rate this question


etfink

Question

Hi all,

looking for feedback regarding my progress and chances, along with any other suggestions.

I served in the Navy from 1999-2005, Honorable discharge as a nuclear mechanical on subs.  Sadly, like many I rarely reported medical issues while I was in, didn't want to hurt the command with absences.  If only I knew then right?

In 2015 I filed put my first claim in, Rhinitis (this was well documented inservice) sleep apnea, i had symptoms inservice that were documented but never diagnosed and hypertension secondary to OSA.  I thought I had a good package, I had buddy statements and an IMO from Dr Ellis.  Well the VA disagreed.  They granted SC Rhinitis at 10% and declined SC for OSA and HTN.  I applied for a denovo review and they upheld the first rating.  I then let my 1 year expire and things ended there.  

 

A few years later my sinuses were getting worse.  I saw an ENT who diagnosed severe sinusitis a deviated septum and polyps.  We tried steroids and antibiotics and then went with a pretty complex sinus surgery.  Post op several rounds of steroids and still have polyps.  I currently use daily steroid irrigation.  That sucks.  

 

My OSA of course was diagnosed with a sleep study, it was rated as severe and I use a CPAP daily.  I strongly feel that the fact that I can barley breath through my nose makes it a lot worse.

The diagnosis on all of these are unarguable.  Its the SC that will be the battle. 

 

HTN: I have pretty severe HTN, it is controlled with 3 meds daily. The literature is pretty clear that OSA worsens HTN.

And for what its worth, I don't use the VA for health care.  

So my packet:

I had hoped to try the DRC process as, I am very lucky to have the resources to build my own claim.

I used Bethany who is a PA at Valor 4 Vets to do my DBQs for Rhinitis /Sinusitis, OSA and HTN.  She also wrote IMOs for each with literature cited.  The least as likely then not phrase  is there for every condition.  I'm happy to post if it will help anyone. 

I also wanted an IMO from a doc with a little stronger CV so I went with Dr Aniase, I know he's been talked about here and like others have said the service was great.  Also he is a former lung transplant surgeon, who has focused a lot on OSA so I thought that was a good fit.  He put together a solid 65 page letter with a lot of literature and medical rationale that OSA is make worse by Rhinitis and that HTN is made worse by OSA.  He went on to say that sinusitis is only caused by rhinitis and pointed out the rationale for increased rhinitis.  

I of course had all of my private medical records. 

 

I took these to my local VFW service officer on 4/17.  I had no problem doing the claim myself by a DRC claim has to be submitted by a VSO.  She tried to discourage the DRC process as it shifts the responsibility to the Vet and the VSO.    I get that but I already have everything and hopefully wont need additional exams as I have my DBQs.  She relented and took all of my compiled paperwork to submit.  Well shockingly while her cover letter asked it to be processed as a DRC, it wasn't uploaded to the DRC portal and is now showing as a regular pending claim.  The OSA and HTN are re-opens.

So I think i have a pretty bulletproof packet.  What thoughts do you all have?  Is there anything else I should do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1
  • Lead Moderator

Sleep Apnea and TDIU, in my humble opinion, are the hardest to win, except maybe for SMC R/2, which pretty much means you are terminally ill in bed.  

I say this over and over:  Focus on the basics of the Caluza Triangle, which I already posted, above.  

Only then worry about symptoms.  

In the case of secondary sc, you need only 2 parts of the Caluza triangle:

1.  Current diagnosis.

2.  Nexus, or statement from the doc that your (secondary condition) is as least as likely as not the result of 

(your primary already sc condition).  

    You dont need an in service event with secondaries, as that is already established with your primary SC.  

    My point is to READ your medical records, dont assume this is in there..it may or may not be for 2 reasons:  One the doc never put it in there, and Two, he put it in your records and the VARO conviently lost it.  Its highly convienient for the VARO to lose documents which are critical to your claim.  Or, they dont lose them, they just dont bother to read them.  

     Attention to my immediatly preceding paragraph would probably win about half the cases at the BVA.  Conversely, neglecting the above paragraph, virtually assures a denial.  Of course, we dont have control over whether or not a rating specialist reads your file, but we do control what/when we send records to the VARO, and assuming the records are there and they are correct is a big mistake.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

If you want it bullet proof, document the following:

1.  current diagnosis...no diagnosis no benefits. 

2.  In service event, or aggravation.  You stated this is documented in service.  Did you read your records, and make sure?

3.  Nexus.  A doctor needs to state your Rhinitis is "at least as likely as not" due to x event or aggravation in service.  

If you have all three of these documented, you are good to go.  If you are lacking any one or more of these, you are setting yourself up for a denial.  

    Based on your post, you have 1 and 2.  Now, make sure a doctor stated pretty much just what I posted.  VSO's love to send Vets to appeals without a nexus.  That's like going to a trap shoot with no shotgun.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
7 hours ago, broncovet said:

If you want it bullet proof, document the following:

1.  current diagnosis...no diagnosis no benefits. 

2.  In service event, or aggravation.  You stated this is documented in service.  Did you read your records, and make sure?

3.  Nexus.  A doctor needs to state your Rhinitis is "at least as likely as not" due to x event or aggravation in service.  

If you have all three of these documented, you are good to go.  If you are lacking any one or more of these, you are setting yourself up for a denial.  

    Based on your post, you have 1 and 2.  Now, make sure a doctor stated pretty much just what I posted.  VSO's love to send Vets to appeals without a nexus.  That's like going to a trap shoot with no shotgun.  

broncovet thanks for your reply!

 

The Rhinitis is already SC at 10, They have found polyps which is the criteria for 30% so I'm going for an increase.

I tried for OSA and HTN in service but it was declined.  No diagnosis although documented symptoms.  So instead I'm going for this.

OSA secondary to Rhinitis.  I have the DX, and 2 doctors saying that the Rhinitis (already SC) aggravates it (as likely as not).

Sinusitis secondary to Rhinitis. I have the DX, and 2 doctors saying that the Rhinitis (already SC) causes it (as likely as not).

HTN Secondary to OSA. I have the DX, and 2 doctors saying that the OSA (applying for SC) aggravates it (as likely as not).

 

Sorry if I was rambling a little and not clear.

 

I went with my own DBQs and 2 strong Nexus letters.  I heard the VA is tightening up on OSA claims so I really wanted my ducks in a row.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
16 hours ago, broncovet said:

Sleep Apnea and TDIU, in my humble opinion, are the hardest to win, except maybe for SMC R/2, which pretty much means you are terminally ill in bed.  

I say this over and over:  Focus on the basics of the Caluza Triangle, which I already posted, above.  

Only then worry about symptoms.  

In the case of secondary sc, you need only 2 parts of the Caluza triangle:

1.  Current diagnosis.

2.  Nexus, or statement from the doc that your (secondary condition) is as least as likely as not the result of 

(your primary already sc condition).  

    You dont need an in service event with secondaries, as that is already established with your primary SC.  

    My point is to READ your medical records, dont assume this is in there..it may or may not be for 2 reasons:  One the doc never put it in there, and Two, he put it in your records and the VARO conviently lost it.  Its highly convienient for the VARO to lose documents which are critical to your claim.  Or, they dont lose them, they just dont bother to read them.  

     Attention to my immediatly preceding paragraph would probably win about half the cases at the BVA.  Conversely, neglecting the above paragraph, virtually assures a denial.  Of course, we dont have control over whether or not a rating specialist reads your file, but we do control what/when we send records to the VARO, and assuming the records are there and they are correct is a big mistake.  

Thank you so much for the solid advice. I’ve heard the same thing about OSA being hard to prove. 

 

My IMOs not only referenced the diagnosis over and over they inserted the relevant records into my letter and then backed up the nexus with studies and excerpts from medical texts. 

 

So on paper I feel good. 

 

Of of course I submitted the raw records as well.  

 

I’ll upload a redacted copy tommorow it might be good for other members to see. I’ve certanly learned by following other members cases here. My IMO/nexus is over 60 pages so it’s a lot of redacting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • -1

Is Rhinitis and OSA considered respiratory issues.

Can you be service connected for two respiratory issues at the same time?

Rhinitis and OSA ??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use