Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

WOULD THIS BE CONSIDERED PYRAMIDING?

Rate this question


paulcolrain

Question

I UNDERSTAND THAT PYRAMIDING IS WHEN IF YOUR LEG HAS AN ISSUE YOU CANT BE RATED FOR HIP KNEE FOOT AND LEG ....?

SO MY QUESTION STEMS FROM,, IF THE VETERAN IS RATED FOR HIP LATERAL TEAR AND ARTHRITUS AND IS RATED RATED UNDER 5251,,5252,,5253 FOR THAT HIP

BUT ALSO HAS

LUMBAR NERVE DAMAGE THAT EFFECTS THE SAME LEG AND IS RATED UNDER 8520 

BUT THE NERVE DAMAGE COULD BE RATED HIGHER IF RATED UNDER 5251,5252,5253 

SO THE QUESTION IS,,, WOULD THIS THEN ERASE THE HIP SERV CON RATING OR WOULD THIS STAY AS 2 DIFFERENT SERV CONNECTIONS THOUGH RATED UNDER SAME???

Make sure to check to see if a higher rating can be given under limited motion of the hip, code 5251-5253, limited motion of the knee, code 5260, or limited motion of the ankle, code 5271. If the condition is best rated as limitation of motion, then the final code will look like this: 8620-5251. The first four-digit number is whichever of the three nerve codes the condition best fits under (paralysis, neuritis, or neuralgia), and the second is the limited motion code where it is rated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Not that this help but I thought that it was a matter of when the injury occurs I have two separate issues with 3 years in between each injury one was my right broken hip and the other was my broken foot. Both service connected for the right leg , I thought it was only pyramiding if it was one injury that they both occured in...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
13 hours ago, jfrei said:

I thought it was only pyramiding if it was one injury that they both occured in...

AND THAT EXACT POINT IS WHAT IM GOING ON... .... IF THE LUMBAR CAUSED THE NERVE ISSUE AND THE LABERAL TEAR CAUSED THE HIP ISSUE..... 

BUT THE QUESTION REALLY IS ,,,, COULD I BE RATED AT RANGE OF MOTION ON BOTH SEPARATE. . IM RATED FOR HIP IM RATED FOR NERVE... BUT THE NERVE IS NOT GIVING ME A GOOD RATING AT ALL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What does the VA mean by “same disability” or “same manifestation”? The important thing to remember is that if you are looking to receive separate ratings as a result of a single disease or injury, the argument that needs to be made is that you suffer from a variety of symptoms that are covered by diagnostic codes that are not duplicate and do not involve overlapping symptomatology. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

SO I GO TO A HEARING AT THE D.C. LEVEL. JUGE MAKES A DECISION ON 1 PART AN REMANDS 2ND PART.....

IN HIS WRITINTNG HE ASKS IF THE NERVE DAMAGE COULD BE THE HIP PROBLEM???? 

DR SAYS NO BECAUSE A NERVE PROBLEM STEMS FROM THE SPINE.

 

BUT THE QUESTION REMAINS LIKE,,,, WHY DID THE JUDGE ASK THIS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

my guess is the judge wants to combine them into one rating if it makes it a higher rating instead of two lower ratings combined equals less money. How it was explained to me one 70 and one 50 won’t  make it 100 but combined under one table could make me 100 scheduler for one disability.

Edited by jfrei
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use