Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

70% SC, Questions on new claim

Rate this question


Combatmedic271

Question

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

As much as you will try and fight getting your TBI and PTSD they will try and combine them im sure your tbi seems to be a higher warranted rating then your 30 % for PTSD.combined along I would take a guess of at least 50% or 70% alone Hurry up and file you have all the evidence submit it with your new claim try to submit all the evidence make sure to bring copies of all tbi history records that highlight claims your bringing up to the C and P inspector.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What makes you think that any condition that is actually "Bi-Lateral" has not already received the "Bi-lateral Factor" when computing your current CSC Rating? Have you filed a VA FOIA request to get a copy of your C-File? It would behoove you to do so at your earliest convenience.

You might want to read up on the VA's latest TBI Rating policies. Unless there is a Dent or substantial Scaring, the Residual Neurological Symptoms get the Disability Rating. If you believe any or all of your 09 SC's have worsened, definitely file the FDC Claim for Increase, let the VA C & P Drs and Raters figure it out.  How about posting a redacted copy of your 2009 Award?

Do you use your VMC for all your Medical care? Have you been referred to the VA Occupational/Physical therapy Dept for your multiple joint problems? When you were initially referred by your VA PCP to the VA Neurology Dept, did you have an EMG performed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gastone,

It is my understanding that there is an additional 10% rating applied with the bilateral factor and I do not see that on the  redacted award letter I attached.  I have not filed for a copy of my C-file, but I will this week.   I have been reading up on the new TBI rating policies and it sounds like PTSD is mental and TBI is physical, but the veteran has to really push to have it rated that way.  Are you saying that unless there are visible signs of TBI it cannot be rated separately from PTSD?

I do use my VMC for all my medical care, however, I have not been referred to OT/PT for my joint problems.  Lastly, I was not referred to Neurology yet.  My PCP had me have an MRI 2 weeks ago, and I have a follow-up in 2 weeks with her and my MH provider in the next 2 weeks.

I understand I should she PT and neurology for these conditions.  Should I also be pushing for DBQ's to be filled out for TBI, PTSD and my joint problems? Thank you. 

Rating Award.docx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You won't see the "Bi-Lateral" term on your E-Ben site. As to the 10% Bi-Lateral Factor, you're not quite accurate as to it's application. It's not an additional full 10% added to the SC. In your case, I see (2) Bilateral Conditions rated at 10% SC for both R & L feet and shins. The VA Bilateral Factor is the addition of 10% of the sum of the 2 SC's involved as Bi-Lateral. In your case, each foot is 10% = 20% (+1%) = 21% for your CSC Calculation.

Take a moment and run your SC numbers on the Hadit Calculator. 1@30 and 8@10 = 69.87 rounded up to 70%. Your erroneous understanding of the 10% Bilateral calculation would have you picking up an additional 20% for a CSC of 75.89, rounded to 80%. Run 1@ 30, 2@ 21, 4@ 10, you'll see that the CSC is 71.336, rounded down to 70%.

Was there anything mentioned in your Award Letter regarding  "Bi-Lateral?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use