Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary disabilities and pyramiding

Rate this question


jlrith

Question

Here is my question:  Given two ratings, one primary and one secondary to that primary disability, is the VA required to evaluate the overall symptoms in the most favorable way?

Rating using the secondary disability results in a vastly higher rating and both ratings cannot be evaluated due to pyramiding.  

 

I am service connected with "Raynaud's syndrome with Chilblains Syndrome and Hyperhidrosis": 40%.   The VA lumped my secondary disabilities of Chilblains and Hyperhidrosis into the Raynaud's rating.  

As part of this many of my symptoms are secondary to Raynaud's.  These secondary symptoms are basically cold injuries and include all but the 'X-ray evidence of arthritis' for cold injury residuals in diagnostic code 7122.  I'm even service connected for a type of cold injury, Chilblains syndrome.

Pyramiding comes since both ratings (and my symptoms) include cold sensitivity, color changes and pain as basic establishing symptoms.  

My disability picture more closely matches the Cold Injury Residuals rating, and in accordance with 38 CFR 4.7, this should be used.  However, in 3.310 there is the line stating: "When service connection is thus established for a secondary condition, the secondary condition shall be considered a part of the original condition."

Does that mean that my overall rating must be done under Raynaud's to avoid pyramiding since the secondary condition "shall be considered a part of the original condition?" 

In addition, the following court cases may apply:

    Buie v. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 242 (2011) 
•    “VA has a well-established duty to maximize a claimant's benefits.”


    AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993)
•    “A veteran is presumed to be seeking the greatest possible benefit unless he specifically indicates otherwise”


    Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 280 (2008)
•    “This duty requires use of the Diagnostic Code that is most favorable to the Veteran.  The applicable Diagnostic Code that results in the highest evaluation must be used, in other words.”
 

 

§ 3.310 Disabilities that are proximately
due to, or aggravated by,
service-connected disease or injury.
(a) General. Except as provided in
§ 3.300(c), disability which is proximately
due to or the result of a service-
connected disease or injury shall be
service connected. When service connection
is thus established for a secondary
condition, the secondary condition
shall be considered a part of the
original condition.

 

7117 Raynaud’s syndrome:
With two or more digital ulcers plus
autoamputation of one or more digits and
history of characteristic attacks ................. 100
With two or more digital ulcers and history
of characteristic attacks ............................. 60
Characteristic attacks occurring at least
daily ........................................................... 40
Characteristic attacks occurring four to six
times a week ............................................. 20
Characteristic attacks occurring one to three
times a week ............................................. 10
NOTE: For purposes of this section, characteristic attacks
consist of sequential color changes of the
digits of one or more extremities lasting minutes to
hours, sometimes with pain and paresthesias, and
precipitated by exposure to cold or by emotional
upsets. These evaluations are for the disease as a
whole, regardless of the number of extremities involved
or whether the nose and ears are involved.

 

7122 Cold injury residuals:

With the following in affected parts:
Arthralgia or other pain, numbness,
or cold sensitivity plus two or
more of the following: tissue loss,
nail abnormalities, color changes,
locally impaired sensation,
hyperhidrosis, X-ray abnormalities
(osteoporosis, subarticular
punched out lesions, or osteoarthritis) ...  30

Arthralgia or other pain, numbness,
or cold sensitivity plus tissue
loss, nail abnormalities, color
changes, locally impaired sensation,
hyperhidrosis, or X-ray abnormalities
(osteoporosis, subarticular
punched out lesions, or
osteoarthritis) ............................... 20
Arthralgia or other pain, numbness,
or cold sensitivity ......................... 10
NOTE (1): Separately evaluate amputations of fingers
or toes, and complications such as squamous cell
carcinoma at the site of a cold injury scar or peripheral
neuropathy, under other diagnostic codes.
Separately evaluate other disabilities that have
been diagnosed as the residual effects of cold injury,
such as Raynaud’s phenomenon, muscle atrophy,
etc., unless they are used to support an
evaluation under diagnostic code 7122.
NOTE (2): Evaluate each affected part (e.g., hand,
foot, ear, nose) separately and combine the ratings
in accordance with §§ 4.25 and 4.26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I believe secondary service connections should be rated separate from your service connected disability.  I am service connected to PTSD but won a claim for neuropathy secondary to my original injury.  The neuropathy is rated separate from the other injuries.  Please look at the veterans law blog at this address https://www.veteranslawblog.org/secondary-service-connection/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

I agree with Jlrith; you have done a great job with your homework.  Now, you need to follow up with timely a timely filed NOD, and timely filing the I9, and your other deadlines as well.  

Your citations were on point and superb, as well as being instructive.  Great job!  Dont neglect to cite evidence in YOUR cfile as to how you meet the criteria for the most favorable rating(s).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

In my case(s),

I have Heart Disease 30% secondary to my original High Blood Pressure 0%, and receive 30%.

I have joints that started 10% for arthritis, but later got 20% because of Range of Motion.

However,

I have Plantar Fasciitis and Arthritis of the same foot, but rated separately at 10 each.

So, I think sometimes, Arthritis is rated separately even with the same area, but, ROM will trump Arthritis as it is only 10% by x-ray evidence.

FWIW,

Hamslice

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use