Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Secondary disabilities and pyramiding

Rate this question


jlrith

Question

Here is my question:  Given two ratings, one primary and one secondary to that primary disability, is the VA required to evaluate the overall symptoms in the most favorable way?

Rating using the secondary disability results in a vastly higher rating and both ratings cannot be evaluated due to pyramiding.  

 

I am service connected with "Raynaud's syndrome with Chilblains Syndrome and Hyperhidrosis": 40%.   The VA lumped my secondary disabilities of Chilblains and Hyperhidrosis into the Raynaud's rating.  

As part of this many of my symptoms are secondary to Raynaud's.  These secondary symptoms are basically cold injuries and include all but the 'X-ray evidence of arthritis' for cold injury residuals in diagnostic code 7122.  I'm even service connected for a type of cold injury, Chilblains syndrome.

Pyramiding comes since both ratings (and my symptoms) include cold sensitivity, color changes and pain as basic establishing symptoms.  

My disability picture more closely matches the Cold Injury Residuals rating, and in accordance with 38 CFR 4.7, this should be used.  However, in 3.310 there is the line stating: "When service connection is thus established for a secondary condition, the secondary condition shall be considered a part of the original condition."

Does that mean that my overall rating must be done under Raynaud's to avoid pyramiding since the secondary condition "shall be considered a part of the original condition?" 

In addition, the following court cases may apply:

    Buie v. Shinseki, 24 Vet. App. 242 (2011) 
•    “VA has a well-established duty to maximize a claimant's benefits.”


    AB v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 35 (1993)
•    “A veteran is presumed to be seeking the greatest possible benefit unless he specifically indicates otherwise”


    Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet. App. 280 (2008)
•    “This duty requires use of the Diagnostic Code that is most favorable to the Veteran.  The applicable Diagnostic Code that results in the highest evaluation must be used, in other words.”
 

 

§ 3.310 Disabilities that are proximately
due to, or aggravated by,
service-connected disease or injury.
(a) General. Except as provided in
§ 3.300(c), disability which is proximately
due to or the result of a service-
connected disease or injury shall be
service connected. When service connection
is thus established for a secondary
condition, the secondary condition
shall be considered a part of the
original condition.

 

7117 Raynaud’s syndrome:
With two or more digital ulcers plus
autoamputation of one or more digits and
history of characteristic attacks ................. 100
With two or more digital ulcers and history
of characteristic attacks ............................. 60
Characteristic attacks occurring at least
daily ........................................................... 40
Characteristic attacks occurring four to six
times a week ............................................. 20
Characteristic attacks occurring one to three
times a week ............................................. 10
NOTE: For purposes of this section, characteristic attacks
consist of sequential color changes of the
digits of one or more extremities lasting minutes to
hours, sometimes with pain and paresthesias, and
precipitated by exposure to cold or by emotional
upsets. These evaluations are for the disease as a
whole, regardless of the number of extremities involved
or whether the nose and ears are involved.

 

7122 Cold injury residuals:

With the following in affected parts:
Arthralgia or other pain, numbness,
or cold sensitivity plus two or
more of the following: tissue loss,
nail abnormalities, color changes,
locally impaired sensation,
hyperhidrosis, X-ray abnormalities
(osteoporosis, subarticular
punched out lesions, or osteoarthritis) ...  30

Arthralgia or other pain, numbness,
or cold sensitivity plus tissue
loss, nail abnormalities, color
changes, locally impaired sensation,
hyperhidrosis, or X-ray abnormalities
(osteoporosis, subarticular
punched out lesions, or
osteoarthritis) ............................... 20
Arthralgia or other pain, numbness,
or cold sensitivity ......................... 10
NOTE (1): Separately evaluate amputations of fingers
or toes, and complications such as squamous cell
carcinoma at the site of a cold injury scar or peripheral
neuropathy, under other diagnostic codes.
Separately evaluate other disabilities that have
been diagnosed as the residual effects of cold injury,
such as Raynaud’s phenomenon, muscle atrophy,
etc., unless they are used to support an
evaluation under diagnostic code 7122.
NOTE (2): Evaluate each affected part (e.g., hand,
foot, ear, nose) separately and combine the ratings
in accordance with §§ 4.25 and 4.26.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I believe secondary service connections should be rated separate from your service connected disability.  I am service connected to PTSD but won a claim for neuropathy secondary to my original injury.  The neuropathy is rated separate from the other injuries.  Please look at the veterans law blog at this address https://www.veteranslawblog.org/secondary-service-connection/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I agree with Jlrith; you have done a great job with your homework.  Now, you need to follow up with timely a timely filed NOD, and timely filing the I9, and your other deadlines as well.  

Your citations were on point and superb, as well as being instructive.  Great job!  Dont neglect to cite evidence in YOUR cfile as to how you meet the criteria for the most favorable rating(s).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

In my case(s),

I have Heart Disease 30% secondary to my original High Blood Pressure 0%, and receive 30%.

I have joints that started 10% for arthritis, but later got 20% because of Range of Motion.

However,

I have Plantar Fasciitis and Arthritis of the same foot, but rated separately at 10 each.

So, I think sometimes, Arthritis is rated separately even with the same area, but, ROM will trump Arthritis as it is only 10% by x-ray evidence.

FWIW,

Hamslice

 

“There is no hook my friend. There's only what we do.”  Doc Holiday 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use