Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
- 0
Back condition as secondary, DBQ
Rate this question
Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question
Read Disability Claims Articles
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Search | Rules
Rate this question
Question
Jeromy
All,
I had my C&P for my back the other day, here is my DBQ. Looking at the examiners notes, he is basically saying, "Yeah, since there is not a noted limp or impaired gait, the fact your were overweight but lost 100lbs., you're knee isn't the cause of your back problems." The doctor puts some medical articles to back up his own theory and opinion do actually persuade a coming denial for my claim. Take a look for yourself, would love the communities thoughts:
Note
LOCAL TITLE: C&P EXAMINATION NOTE
STANDARD TITLE: C & P EXAMINATION NOTE
DATE OF NOTE: MAY 17, 2018@08:00 ENTRY DATE: MAY 17, 2018@14:32:21
AUTHOR: DYE,JAMES C EXP COSIGNER:
URGENCY: STATUS: COMPLETED
Back (Thoracolumbar Spine) Conditions
Disability Benefits Questionnaire
Is this DBQ being completed in conjunction with a VA 21-2507, C&P
Examination
Request?
[X] Yes [ ] No
ACE and Evidence Review
-----------------------
Indicate method used to obtain medical information to complete this
document:
[X] In-person examination
Evidence Review
---------------
Evidence reviewed (check all that apply):
[X] VA e-folder (VBMS or Virtual VA)
[X] CPRS
1. Diagnosis
------------
Does the Veteran now have or has he/she ever been diagnosed with a
thoracolumbar spine (back) condition?
[X] Yes [ ] No
Thoracolumbar Common Diagnoses:
No response provided.
Diagnosis #1: degenerative arthritis with facet arthropathy L4-L5,
L5-S1
ICD code: M47.817
Date of diagnosis: 8/01/2014
2. Medical history
------------------
a. Describe the history (including onset and course) of the Veteran's
thoracolumbar spine (back) condition (brief summary):
The Veteran states he developed back pain while in the military prior to
injuring his right knee. He provides a copy of his STR from 11/20/2003
which show acute onset of idiopathic (non-traumatic) low back pain. The
note states he had decreased ROM of the back with mild parapsinal
tenderness. He was treated medically and seen again on 12/01/2003, and
the medical information provided shows full resolution of a thoracic
muscle sprain which had occurred 10 days prior according to the records
provided. A normal exam was noted and the note states he was returned to
full duty with complete resolution of the injury.
The Veteran then injured right knee in 2005 which lead to a medical
discharge on 5/10/2006. The MEB does not mention a back condition at that
time. A review of the C&P examination performed on 7/24/2006 near the
time
of discharge noted the history of a thoracic muscle sprain, but notes the
spine was completely normal on exam and the veteran had NO complaint of
back pain. Thoracic and lumboscaral xrays of the spine performed on
7/20/2006 were compltely normal at that time. The Veteran's knee
condition was noted and his gait was noted to be normal.
The Veteran states today he continued with low back pain which he
self-treated and did not require addititonal medical attention until
2014.
The Veteran sought medical attention for his lower back during his first
PCP visit at the Hunter Holmes McGuire VAMC on 08/01/2014 stating the
back
pain worsened due to moving and lifting heavy boxes a few months prior.
At
that time the Veteran also weighed nearly 300 pounds and had a BMI of 40
on 8/01/2014.
His gait was noted to be normal.
Records multiple medical visits to the Castle Point VAMC for his ongoing
right knee pain years earlier, but no mention of a back condition. An
orthopedic evaluation on 2008 noted the ongoing right knee condition but
a
normal gait and no back condition was recorded.
The Veteran had a BMI of 40 on 08/01/2014. He went on a diet and lost
100
pounds over 2-3 years. His current BMI in approximately 30. He is a
non-smoker. He drinks alcohol about about 5-6 beers on about 3-4 times
weekly. He currently works at Fort Lee as a academic counselor, which is
a
seated non-stenous job, although prolonged sitting will aggravate his
lower back.
Currently, he is having a flair of low back pain which started 5/3/2018
and he was evaluated on 5/04/2018 by his PCP at the Hunter Holmes McGuire
VAMC. He had been physically acitve prior to the onset of worsening back
pain without any specific injury or changes in the activity before the
pain decveloped by his rpeort. The PCP noted he had been participating in
kick boxing according to the PCP note, but the Veteran states the kick
boxing is non-combative and does not involve hitting but is more of a
movement exercise, but states he did not injure himself.
The Veteran appears very stiff and guarded with his back and prefers to
stand during the interview. he has difficulty moving about the exam table
due to low back pain, however on exal the lumbosacral muscles are flaccid
without spasm or tension, although it is painful to gently palpate the
lower lumbar muscles. The thoracic muscles are neither tender not tight.
b. Does the Veteran report flare-ups of the thoracolumbar spine (back)?
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, document the Veteran's description of the flare-ups in his
or her
own words:
The Veteran is currently have a flair with increased pain and
decreased movement of the lower back. He reports 2 such flairs over
the last year and will typically last 7-10 days, although currenlty
the symptoms have been present for 2 weeks.
c. Does the Veteran report having any functional loss or functional
impairment of the thoracolumbar spine (back) (regardless of repetitive use)?
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, document the Veteran's description of functional loss or
functional impairment in his or her own words.
The Veteran reports limiting his lifting to less than 15 pounds. He
does not sit longer than a few minutes before trying to change
position. He limits bending forward to pick up objects from the
floor. He states he limits his exercises to stretching and gentle
movements
3. Range of motion (ROM) and functional limitation
--------------------------------------------------
a. Initial range of motion
[ ] All normal
[X] Abnormal or outside of normal range
[ ] Unable to test (please explain)
[ ] Not indicated (please explain)
Forward Flexion (0 to 90): 0 to 20 degrees
Extension (0 to 30): 0 to 18 degrees
Right Lateral Flexion (0 to 30): 0 to 14 degrees
Left Lateral Flexion (0 to 30): 0 to 12 degrees
Right Lateral Rotation (0 to 30): 0 to 24 degrees
Left Lateral Rotation (0 to 30): 0 to 20 degrees
If abnormal, does the range of motion itself contribute to a
functional loss? [X] Yes (please explain) [ ] No
If yes, please explain:
limited forward motion of lower back inhibit usual movments like
bending forward to pick up objects
Description of pain (select best response):
Pain noted on exam but does not result in/cause functional loss
If noted on exam, which ROM exhibited pain (select all that apply)?
Forward Flexion, Extension, Left Lateral Flexion, Left Lateral
Rotation,
Is there evidence of pain with weight bearing? [X] Yes [ ] No
Is there objective evidence of localized tenderness or pain on palpation
of the join
ts or associated soft tissue of the thoracolumbar spine (back)?
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, describe including location, severity and relationship to
condition(s):
tender lower lumbar muscle to light tough, but muscles without spasm
b. Observed repetitive use
Is the Veteran able to perform repetitive use testing with at least three
repetitions? [X] Yes [ ] No
Is there additional loss of function or range of motion after three
repetitions? [X] Yes [ ] No
Select all factors that cause this functional loss:
Pain
ROM after 3 repetitions:
Forward Flexion (0 to 90): 0 to 15 degrees
Extension (0 to 30): 0 to 10 degrees
Right Lateral Flexion (0 to 30): 0 to 10 degrees
Left Lateral Flexion (0 to 30): 0 to 10 degrees
Right Lateral Rotation (0 to 30): 0 to 24 degrees
Left Lateral Rotation (0 to 30): 0 to 20 degrees
c. Repeated use over time
Is the Veteran being examined immediately after repetitive use over time?
[ ] Yes [X] No
If the examination is not being conducted immediately after
repetitive
use over time:
[ ] The examination is medically consistent with the Veteran's
statements describing functional loss with repetitive use over
time.
[ ] The examination is medically inconsistent with the Veteran's
statements describing functional loss with repetitive use over
time. Please explain.
[X] The examination is neither medically consistent or inconsistent
with the Veteran's statements describing functional loss
with
repetitive use over time.
Does pain, weakness, fatigability or incoordination significantly limit
functional ability with repeated use over a period of time?
[X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Unable to say w/o mere speculation
Select all factors that cause this functional loss:
Pain
Able to describe in terms of range of motion: [ ] Yes [X] No
If no, please describe:
The Veteran states there is more pain and less function when the
joint is used over times repeatedly or during flair, but since
those conditions are not currently present to examine any further
estimation of ROM other than what is documented would be pure
estimation.
d. Flare-ups
Is the exam being conducted during a flare-up? [X] Yes [ ] No
Does pain, weakness, fatigability or incoordination significantly limit
functional ability with flare-ups?
[X] Yes [ ] No [ ] Unable to say w/o mere speculation
Select all factors that cause this functional loss:
Pain
Able to describe in terms of range of motion: [X] Yes [ ] No
Forward Flexion (0 to 90): 0 to 15 degrees
Extension (0 to 30): 0 to 10 degrees
Right Lateral Flexion (0 to 30): 0 to 10 degrees
Left Lateral Flexion (0 to 30): 0 to 10 degrees
Right Lateral Rotation (0 to 30): 0 to 24 degrees
Left Lateral Rotation (0 to 30): 0 to 20 degrees
e. Guarding and muscle spasm
Does the Veteran have guarding or muscle spasm of the thoracolumbar spine
(back)? [ ] Yes [X] No
f. Additional factors contributing to disability
In addition to those addressed above, are there additional contributing
factors of disability? Please select all that apply and describe:
Less movement than normal due to ankylosis, adhesions, etc.,
Disturbance
of locomotion, Interference with sitting
Please describe additional contributing factors of disability:
prolonged sitting and walking will worsen lower back pain
4. Muscle strength testing
--------------------------
a. Rate strength according to the following scale:
0/5 No muscle movement
1/5 Palpable or visible muscle contraction, but no joint movement
2/5 Active movement with gravity eliminated
3/5 Active movement against gravity
4/5 Active movement against some resistance
5/5 Normal strength
Hip flexion:
Right: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Left: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Knee extension:
Right: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Left: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Ankle plantar flexion:
Right: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Left: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Ankle dorsiflexion:
Right: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Left: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Great toe extension:
Right: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
Left: [X] 5/5 [ ] 4/5 [ ] 3/5 [ ] 2/5 [ ] 1/5 [ ] 0/5
b. Does the Veteran have muscle atrophy?
[ ] Yes [X] No
5. Reflex exam
--------------
Rate deep tendon reflexes (DTRs) according to the following scale:
0 Absent
1+ Hypoactive
2+ Normal
3+ Hyperactive without clonus
4+ Hyperactive with clonus
Knee:
Right: [ ] 0 [ ] 1+ [X] 2+ [ ] 3+ [ ] 4+
Left: [ ] 0 [ ] 1+ [X] 2+ [ ] 3+ [ ] 4+
Ankle:
Right: [ ] 0 [ ] 1+ [X] 2+ [ ] 3+ [ ] 4+
Left: [ ] 0 [ ] 1+ [X] 2+ [ ] 3+ [ ] 4+
6. Sensory exam
---------------
Provide results for sensation to light touch (dermatome) testing:
Upper anterior thigh (L2):
Right: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Left: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Thigh/knee (L3/4):
Right: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Left: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Lower leg/ankle (L4/L5/S1):
Right: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Left: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Foot/toes (L5):
Right: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
Left: [X] Normal [ ] Decreased [ ] Absent
7. Straight leg raising test
----------------------------
Provide straight leg raising test results:
Right: [X] Negative [ ] Positive [ ] Unable to perform
Left: [X] Negative [ ] Positive [ ] Unable to perform
8. Radiculopathy
----------------
Does the Veteran have radicular pain or any other signs or symptoms due to
radiculopathy?
[ ] Yes [X] No
9. Ankylosis
------------
Is there ankylosis of the spine? [ ] Yes [X] No
10. Other neurologic abnormalities
----------------------------------
Does the Veteran have any other neurologic abnormalities or findings related
to a thoracolumbar spine (back) condition (such as bowel or bladder
problems/pathologic reflexes)?
[ ] Yes [X] No
11. Intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS) and episodes requiring bed rest
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Does the Veteran have IVDS of the thoracolumbar spine?
[ ] Yes [X] No
12. Assistive devices
---------------------
a. Does the Veteran use any assistive device(s) as a normal mode of
locomotion, although occasional locomotion by other methods may be
possible?
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, identify assistive device(s) used (check all that apply and
indicate frequency):
Assistive Device: Frequency of use:
----------------- -----------------
[X] Cane(s) [X] Occasional [ ] Regular [ ] Constant
b. If the Veteran uses any assistive devices, specify the condition and
identify the assistive device used for each condition:
veteran states occasionally uses walking stick to steady himself
whenback pain flairs
13. Remaining effective function of the extremities
---------------------------------------------------
Due to a thoracolumbar spine (back) condition, is there functional
impairment
of an extremity such that no effective function remains other than that
which
would be equally well served by an amputation with prosthesis? (Functions of
the upper extremity include grasping, manipulation, etc.; functions of the
lower extremity include balance and propulsion, etc.)
[X] No
14. Other pertinent physical findings, complications, conditions, signs,
symptoms and scars
------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Does the Veteran have any other pertinent physical findings,
complications, conditions, signs or symptoms related to any conditions
listed in the Diagnosis Section above?
[ ] Yes [X] No
b. Does the Veteran have any scars (surgical or otherwise) related to any
conditions or to the treatment of any conditions listed in the Diagnosis
Section above?
[ ] Yes [X] No
c. Comments, if any:
No response provided
15. Diagnostic testing
----------------------
a. Have imaging studies of the thoracolumbar spine been performed and are
the
results available?
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes, is arthritis documented?
[X] Yes [ ] No
b. Does the Veteran have a thoracic vertebral fracture with loss of 50
percent or more of height?
[ ] Yes [X] No
c. Are there any other significant diagnostic test findings and/or results?
[ ] Yes [X] No
16. Functional impact
---------------------
Does the Veteran's thoracolumbar spine (back) condition impact on his or
her
ability to work?
[X] Yes [ ] No
If yes describe the impact of each of the Veteran's
thoracolumbar
spine (back) conditions providing one or more examples:
In regards to functional impairment related to occupations,
veteran
cannot perform tasks that require prolonged standing or sitting
without reasonable accommodation for change in position,
repetitive
bending or lifting, or any tasks that require lifting above his
head, pulling, pushing, crawling, or stooping. These activities
would aggravate his current back condition and veteran may not be
able to do these activities safely.
Veteran's back condition does affect his ability to perform
basic
activities of daily living without difficulty. Based on the
physical exam and medical record, veteran remains independent with
his basic ADLs but performs them with difficulty because of his
back condition. Specifically, his back condition affects his
ability to dress himself, perform personal hygiene, and ambulate
without pain or impairment
17. Remarks, if any:
--------------------
Minimal degenrative arthritic changes noted on lumbosacral xray 8/01/2014.
Per the VA Form 21-2507 related to this claim, this examiner addressed the
Correia questions listed. For any joint condition tested during this exam,
this examiner tested the affected joint listed in this claim along with the
contralateral joint, unless medically contraindicated, and this examiner
addressed pain on both passive and active motion, and on both weightbearing
and non-weightbearing. For all measurements listed on this exam, the
goniometer was used by this examiner. The measurements listed on this DBQ
reflect measured pain-free active movement using the goniometer.
In addition to the questions on the DBQ, this examiner responded to the
following questions:
1. Is there evidence of pain on passive range of motion testing?
(Yes, in the lower back.
2. Is there evidence of pain when the joint is used in non-weight
bearing? (Yes, at times in the lower back.
3. If yes, is the opposing joint undamaged (i.e. no abnormalities)?
There is no opposing joint to the thoracolumbar spine.
****************************************************************************
Medical Opinion
Disability Benefits Questionnaire
ACE and Evidence Review
-----------------------
Indicate method used to obtain medical information to complete this
document:
[X] In-person examination
Evidence Review
---------------
Evidence reviewed (check all that apply):
[X] VA e-folder (VBMS or Virtual VA)
[X] CPRS
MEDICAL OPINION SUMMARY
-----------------------
RESTATEMENT OF REQUESTED OPINION:
a. Opinion from general remarks: Is the Veteran's degenerative disc
disease/arthritis lumbar spine at least as likely as not (50% or greater
probability) proximately due to or the results of knee arthritis status post
patellar dislocation and arthroscopic knee surgery?
b. Indicate type of exam for which opinion has been requested: DBQ Musc Knee
TYPE OF MEDICAL OPINION PROVIDED: [ MEDICAL OPINION FOR SECONDARY SERVICE
CONNECTION ]
b. The condition claimed is less likely than not (less than 50%
probability) proximately due to or the result of the Veteran's service
connected condition.
c. Rationale: The Veteran injured his knee playing basketball in 2005 which
resulted in a patellar injury, subsequent surgery, ongoing pain and
evenetaully osteoarthritis of the right knee which causes the Veteran a good
deal of pain in the right knee.
There is no current gait abnormality from the knee injury noted on
examination today and review of the Veteran's medical records do not
show any
abberation in the Veteran's gait despite ongoing knee pain in medical
information available fom 5/28/2005, 07/24/2006, 11/03/2008, 08/01/2014,
03/21/2018, 4/26/2018 and 05/04/2018, which includes exams by orthopedic
(2008 and 3/21/2018) and PMR (04/26/2018) specialists.
The idea that an injury in one part of the body, espescially a lower limb,
will cause a condition to develop in another part of the body - such as the
low back, is a popular notion with little basis in fact.
A discussion paper, "Limping and Back Pain" in the The Workplace
Safety and
Insurance Appeals Tribunal, March 2004 and Revised: August 2013 prepared by:
Dr. Ian J. Harrington, B.A.Sc., P. Eng., M.D., F.R.C.S.(C), M.S., MSc.
(Strath.) examines the possible connection between limping from a number of
causes and the development of back pain.
The article states that in general only persons with a limp with an abnormal
gait caused by the lower leg condition MAY be at risk for developing a
condition in the lower back from excess torque or angulation of the lower
back with walking. According to the article, "it would probably be
necessary
for the limp to be severe and prolonged, meaning years, for it to have a
significant impact on the initiation or aggravation of arthritis of the
spine. As well, it would also be necessary for the Trendelenburg gait
pattern
to have been severe and present for an extended period of time, probably
years, to have any permanent effect on the spine. Even then, the article
states such evidence is limited and inconclusive.
However, most importantly, the Veteran has no such limp today, nor is a gait
abnormality or significant back angulation with movement ever noted in the
Veteran's medical records dating from 2005 until the present. Thus this
lack
of connecting physical findings and possible biomechanics makes it extremely
unlikely pain in the knee would then cause the Veteran to develop a back
condition in an anatomically separate area. Rather, the Veteran's back
condition is an independent finding sepatate in time and location from his
knee condition.
Low back pain is an extremely common problem in working-age people. Risk
factors associated with back pain complaints include smoking, obesity, age,
female gender, physically strenuous work, sedentary work, psychologically
strenuous work, low educational attainment, Workers' Compensation
insurance,
job dissatisfaction, and psychologic factors such as somatization disorder,
anxiety, and depression. Transient exposure to a number of modifiable
physical and psychosocial triggers substantially increases risk for a new
episode of lower back pain making one causal event difficult to pinpoint.
(Steffens, D., Ferreira, M. L., Latimer, J., Ferreira, P. H., Koes, B. W.,
Blyth, F., Li, Q. and Maher, C. G. (2015), What Triggers an Episode of Acute
Low Back Pain? A Case-Crossover Study. Arthritis Care & Research, 67:
403-410. doi:10.1002/acr.22533.)
Based on this examiner's review of current peer-reviewed literature
along
with a Cochrane Database Systemic Review, the systemic review of multiple
studies support that there is a causal association between obesity and low
back pain. Several possible mechanisms explain this association. First,
obesity could increase the mechanical load on the spine by causing a higher
compressive force or increased shear on the lumbar spine structures during
various activities. Obese people may also be more liable to incur accidental
injuries. Second, obesity may cause low back pain through systemic chronic
inflammation. Obesity is associated with increased production of cytokines
and acute-phase reactants and with activation of proinflammatory pathways,
which, in turn, may lead to pain. Third, population-based studies have shown
a stronger association of abdominal obesity than generalized obesity with
low
back pain. Other studies have reported that obesity is associated with disc
degeneration and vertebral endplate changes. Spinal mobility decreases with
increasing body weight, which may interfere with disc nutrition.
Atherosclerosis could cause malnutrition of the disc cells, which may
predispose to disc degeneration (The Association Between Obesity and Low
Back
Pain: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Epidemiol (2009) 171 (2): 135-154.) The Veteran
was nearly 300 pounds with a BMI of 40 at the point the Veteran sought
medical attention for back pain. While obesity was not likely the sole
causal factor either, it more likely than not a combination of factors such
as obesity, sedentary work and others were the root of the Veteran's
onset of
his current back condition.
*************************************************************************
TYPE OF MEDICAL OPINION PROVIDED: [ MEDICAL OPINION FOR AGGRAVATION OF A
NONSERVICE CONNECTED CONDITION BY A SERVICE CONNECTED CONDITI0N ]
a. Can you determine a baseline level of severity of (claimed
condition/diagnosis) based upon medical evidence available prior to
aggravation or the earliest medical evidence following aggravation by
(service connected condition)? Yes
i. Describe the baseline level of severity of (claimed
condition/diagnosis) based upon medical evidence available prior to
aggravation or the earliest medical evidence following aggravation by
(service connected condition): The Veteran was noted to have a normal
spinal exam and no reported pain in the lower back on 7/24/2006 during a
C&P
examination shortly after his discharge.
ii. Provide the date and nature of the medical evidence used to provide the
baseline: C&P examination examined all claimed conditions at that time
in
2006 which included the right knee, which was noted to have a debility, and
the spine which was noted to be normal by the examining provider.
iii. Is the current severity of the (claimed condition/diagnosis) greater
than the baseline? Yes
If yes, was the Veteran's (claimed condition/diagnosis) at least as
likely as not aggravated beyond its natural progression by (insert
"service
connected condition")? No
b. Provide rationale: There is no medical doucmentation to link the level
of debility or dysfunction of the Veteran's service-connected knee
condition
and his claimed condition of the lumboscaral back.
There is currently no gait abnormality from the knee injury noted on
examination today and review of the Veteran's medical records do not
show any
abberation in the Veteran's gait despite ongoing knee pain in medical
information available fom 5/28/2005, 07/24/2006, 11/03/2008, 08/01/2014,
03/21/2018, 4/26/2018 and 05/04/2018, which includes exams by orthopedic
(2008 and 3/21/2018) and PMR (04/26/2018) specialists.
As noted in prior opinion, the idea that an injury in one part of the body,
espescially a lower limb, will cause a condition to develop in another part
of the body - such as the low back, is a popular notion with little basis in
fact.
A discussion paper, "Limping and Back Pain" in the The Workplace
Safety and
Insurance Appeals Tribunal, March 2004 and Revised: August 2013 prepared
by:
Dr. Ian J. Harrington, B.A.Sc., P. Eng., M.D., F.R.C.S.(C), M.S., MSc.
(Strath.) examines the possible connection between limping from a number of
causes and the development of back pain.
The article states that in general only persons with a limp of abnormal gait
caused by the lower leg condition MAY be at risk for developing a condition
in the lower back from excess torque or angulation of the lower back with
walking. According to the article, "it would probably be necessary for
the
limp to be severe and prolonged, meaning years, for it to have a significant
impact on the initiation or aggravation of arthritis of the spine. As well,
it would also be necessary for the Trendelenburg gait pattern to have been
severe and present for an extended period of time, probably years, to have
any permanent effect on the spine. Even then, the article states such
evidence is limited and inconclusive.
However, most importantly, the Veteran has no such limp today, nor is a
Gait abnormality or significant back angulation with movement ever noted in the
Veteran's medical records dating from 2005 until the present. Thus this
lack
of connecting physical findings and possible biomechanics makes it extremely
unlikely pain in the knee would then cause the Veteran to develop a back
condition or aggravate an existing back problem in an anatomically separate
area. Rather, the Veteran's back condition is an independent finding
sepatate in time and location from his knee condition.
*************************************************************************
/es/ JAMES C DYE, M.D.
PRIMARY CARE ATTENDING
Signed: 05/17/2018 14:32
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
3
2
1
Popular Days
May 21
6
Top Posters For This Question
Jeromy 3 posts
Buck52 2 posts
Sgt. Wilky 1 post
Popular Days
May 21 2018
6 posts
Popular Posts
Sgt. Wilky
Looks strangely familiar to my VA notes by my C&P examiner. I'm so hot and angry now. Between the C&P exams and the wait times, this crap sure gets old doesn't it? Sgt. Wilky
5 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now