Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran's Choice Prostrate Cancer Referral at Mayo

Rate this question


peakgolf

Question

I am a 100% P&T USMC Vietnam Vet, just diagnosed with Prostrate Cancer....can I get a Referral thru Veteran's Choice for treatment at Mayo Clinic?....anyone out there used Mayo for Cancer Treatments?  Thoughts or advice??

Thanks in advance for any advice, comments, etc....peakgolf

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

You would need to ask your prime care doc, if you can be referred to another clinic, I cant answer this. 

I checked, and, sure enough Mayo and Cleveland Clinic are 1 and 2 for urology. 

https://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals/rankings/urology

For cancer, however, its a little different:

https://health.usnews.com/best-hospitals/rankings/cancer

My suggestion is you research (and maybe call them!!) the  hosptials and ask them what it would take to get a referral from YOUR VAMC.  

Probably pick from the 2 lists above, taking into consideration you will have to go there and spend considerable time there.  Maybe you even have relatives in a nearby city.  

I can tell you that my father in law was diagnosed with prostate cancer at least 20 years before he died, and he died of something totally unrelated.  He did not die of cancer.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks broncovet, I met with Mayo today and they seem pretty squared away,  I do have pretty good private insurance, I filed a claim with VA last week, my VA Urologist seems to be on board with the Referral.....I always feel better when I get a take from you guys/gals 😊😊

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Recent Medical Study indicated that there was no difference in Life expectancy of PC Patients that went with "Watchful Waiting" as opposed to Surgery or Radiation.

All Nam Vets know somebody that's had PC Surgery or Radiation and the side effects of both procedures. You're in your early to mid 70's, quality of life needs to be carefully considered. Cancer surgeons like to cut, Cancer Radiologists prefer to Radiate, you're facing a probable Life Changing Choice.

A good friend, PC Radiation back in 07, died 10/17. When the Cancer came back in 2016, it was everywhere. If he got 4 years of minor to medium suffering, I think I'd be exaggerating. I'm in the Watchful Wait Camp, after seeing what he went thru.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Prostate issues, including prostate cancer is very widespread especially in men over 60.  Its so widespread, in fact, that I heard someone say that every (man) will eventually have prostate issues, UNLESS he dies of something else, first.  

I have prostate issues, and am in a "prevent" mode.  I beleive there are life style changes you can make that will prevent it from getting worse, or prevent you from getting it all together.  This explains it fairly well:

https://prostate.net/articles/how-japanese-men-prevent-prostate-cancer

Notice that it explained Japanese men, if they move here, quickly get it just as often as American Men, so it isnt a genetic thing.    Its factors you control, such as what and how much you eat, and whether or not you walk a lot.  (You dont have control over your heritage..you cant change that, and I wouldnt want to).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use