Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bilateral Factor Inquiry

Rate this question


Ray C

Question

Good Day,

Can someone please assist with my inquiry.  I was rated for degenerative arthritis right hip adduction (20%) and degenerative arthritis left hip adduction  (10%) and both ratings state (claimed as bilateral hip condition).  I was also rated for radiculopathy, sciatic nerve (Left 20% + Right 20%)  and radiculopathy, femoral nerve (Left 20% + Right 20%) for both left and right lower extremities.  The sciatic and femoral nerve ratings are for both legs but why aren't they rated as bilateral factors since they affect both lower extremities ?  Is this only applicable once to a rating affecting a "paired" extremity or should it apply multiple times ?

As a side note, I was rated 0% for degenerative arthritis , right hip extension (claimed as bilateral hip condition) but this bilateral statement is not paired with the "Left" hip extension. 

Following is the definition of Bilateral Factor:

When a veteran has a disability that affects both arms, both legs, or paired skeletal muscles, their overall combined rating must reflect what’s known as the bilateral factor. Specifically, the bilateral factor is defined by statute as existing when “a partial disability results from disease or injury of both arms, or of both legs, or of paired skeletal muscles, the ratings for the disabilities of the right and left sides will be combined as usual, and 10% of this value will be added before proceeding with further combinations.”

Thanks in advance for your comments.

Ray C.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

These are some good links to the bilateral factor:

https://veterans.perkinslawtalk.com/post/the-bilateral-factor-in-va-ratings/

https://www.hillandponton.com/bilateral-factor-va-disability-rating/

( Matt Hill vet lawyer is a member here)

 

And I dont think this pdf. from the PH has changed since they posted it :

http://www.purpleheart.org/ServiceProgram/Training2012/22-W Bilateral-VA Math.pdf

an you scan and attach here the VA decision and the rating info?

(Cover you C file #, name prior to scanning it)

I am sure VA makes errors on the bilateral factor- but not enough info here to know yet,in your case.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
18 minutes ago, Berta said:

These are some good links to the bilateral factor:

https://veterans.perkinslawtalk.com/post/the-bilateral-factor-in-va-ratings/

https://www.hillandponton.com/bilateral-factor-va-disability-rating/

( Matt Hill vet lawyer is a member here)

 

And I dont think this pdf. from the PH has changed since they posted it :

http://www.purpleheart.org/ServiceProgram/Training2012/22-W Bilateral-VA Math.pdf

an you scan and attach here the VA decision and the rating info?

(Cover you C file #, name prior to scanning it)

I am sure VA makes errors on the bilateral factor- but not enough info here to know yet,in your case.

Berta,

Thanks for the references. I have seen the PH slide show but it's still a bit complicated for me to understand. I have not yet received the rating decision letter. I went onto Ebenefits to see the disability ratings that were decided two days ago.  When I receive the actual letter, I will post on here sans the Personal Information.

Thanks !!!

Ray

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

How about posting a redacted copy of your Rating Letter, all pages. The Rater's discussion regarding Rating Decisions, Authorities and Evidence Reviewed, would be very helpful.   

Are you working with a POA-VSO Rep or are did you do a DIY project? Might be prudent to have a sit-down with a POA-VSO Rep to discuss future moves.

You may not be aware that the "Bilateral Rating with the 10% Factor" has been used to determine your CSC. As an illustration, your Bilateral hip SCs are respectively, 20% + 10%= 30% x10% = 3% + 30 = 33%. You won't see this figure on your Rating Letter. it would be in your C-File, that your POA-VSO could view and Print in his office. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
5 hours ago, Gastone said:

How about posting a redacted copy of your Rating Letter, all pages. The Rater's discussion regarding Rating Decisions, Authorities and Evidence Reviewed, would be very helpful.   

Are you working with a POA-VSO Rep or are did you do a DIY project? Might be prudent to have a sit-down with a POA-VSO Rep to discuss future moves.

You may not be aware that the "Bilateral Rating with the 10% Factor" has been used to determine your CSC. As an illustration, your Bilateral hip SCs are respectively, 20% + 10%= 30% x10% = 3% + 30 = 33%. You won't see this figure on your Rating Letter. it would be in your C-File, that your POA-VSO could view and Print in his office. 

Gastone,

Thanks for the comeback. I understand the Bilateral Factor when there's a situation that only encompasses a left and right extremity. In my case I have multiple SCD's that involves both lower extremities but the Bilateral Factor was only applied once. 

I am awaiting my rating decision letter and if I receive before my leaving town on May 30 for an extended period I will post it here for commentary. 

I do have a VSO and she will sit with me as soon as we both can see the Rater's decisions letter. I just wanted to pose the Bilateral Factor inquiry to have a better understanding. 

Thanks,

Ray C.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use