Jump to content
  • 0

cue or not to cue....


paulcolrain

Question

ok so ,,,, 

if you read back on some of my posts you will see the issues i was having with the va,

long short..

i was :

20bilat

20bilat

20bilat

20bilat

and 40  = 76.4 PAYS 80

NOW IM, 

40 bilat

20bilat

20bilat

20bilat

and 40. = 83.4 PAYS 80

Edited by paulcolrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

No offense, but give us a summary, of "your" reasons its CUE.  Cite the specific regulation(s) you think VA violated.  You have to show that any error they made was outcome determinative.  If they forgot to dot an "i" that does not mean you deserve 100 percent back to the error, for example.  

If you cant put your finger on the regulatory violation, chances are it wont fly, OR you just are not familiar with regulations.   

Have you thought of reopening due to 38 cfr 3.156 b (if its still pending)  or 3.156 c if its about service records?  

Remember, you just have had to sent that new evidence to them, you dont have to write  them a letter and state that you are reopening due to 3.156.  If you did that in the appeal period, or while the claim was pending, then you should go that route instead.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 0

3.156 b New and material evidence received prior to the expiration of the appeal period, I LIKE THIS...

so the cue/ recon happend because a grant of service was awarded and the rater had in front of him (at the time he/she rated) repeated use over time & flare ups both showed more loss of motion than the original range of motion testing. though i was only rated on the 10% level instead of the 20% level that is warranted under the code. 

so that happend..

well while working it at the ro they turned it into a claim and sent me for a C + P exam...

so then i get the claim closed and awared an increase to 1 issue but not the other and the effective date is of what va called a reopened claim

Edited by paulcolrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What is your CUE Claim theory? Thoughts and Feelings aren't supportive Evidence of a CUE.

Could you be more specific? How about laying out your CUE Review or Appeal to us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, Gastone said:

Could you be more specific? How about laying out your CUE Review or Appeal to us?

ill try Gastone,

first some time line.

1) had a hearing in D.C. at the BVA. 6 contentions where at issue.

2) august 2017 i was Granted bilateral hip condition as a result of that hearing. initial grant of service. so no opinion on rate. ( THE OTHER 4 WENT TO REMAND AND STILL)

3) the raters in the AMC at the BVA in Washington D.C. went through claims folder to rate my newly granted SC.

4) they rated me 10% for each hip under dc codes: 5251.5252 and 5253....... now under those codes 5252 and 5253 the veteran can get higher than 10%. but they didnt do that.

so thats the begining of this cue,,, what the rater decided was,,, for 5252 i DID NOT HAVE forward flex that resulted in a higher rating (30deg =20%) because  c&p exam showed 45 deg of flex with pain. BUT in that SAME c&p exam it clearly shows that under repeated use over time my flex loss of motion at 30 deg fatigue ,locomotion.AND the same c&p exam shows Flare Ups result in loss of motion at 30deg with fatigue ,locomotion.  SO THE RATER HAD IN FRONT OF THEM AT TIME OF RATING A HIGHER WAY TO RATE ME THATS MY BEGINING OF CUE FOR THIS CODE.

ALSO,, DURING THE RATING FOR THE CODE 5253 ,.,,,

what the rater decided was,,, for 5253 i DID NOT HAVE ABDUCTION that resulted in a higher rating (LOSS AT 10deg =20%) because  c&p exam showed 20 deg of ABDUCTION with pain. BUT in that SAME c&p exam it clearly shows that under repeated use over time my ABDUCTION loss of motion at 10 deg fatigue ,locomotion.AND the same c&p exam shows Flare Ups result ABDUCTION  loss of motion at 10deg with fatigue ,locomotion.  SO THE RATER HAD IN FRONT OF THEM AT TIME OF RATING A HIGHER WAY TO RATE ME THATS MY BEGINING OF CUE FOR THIS CODE

ITS CLEAR TO ME THAT THE RATER FAILED TO USE THE FUNCTIONAL LOSS AND  OR THE FLARE UP RULES.

 

SO,,, AFTER ALL THAT,,,, AND WHILE NOT UNDERSTANDING WHAT A CUE IS,,,,, 3/05/18 I SENT THIS EVIDENCE IN FOR AN INCREASE BECAUSE I BELIEVED THEY MADE A MISTAKE AND DIDNT READ THOSE PORTIONS OF THE C&P..

THIS IS WHEN IT GETS STRANGE AND INTERESTING.,,,

THEY SEND ME FOR A NEW C&P EXAM THEN A WEEK LATER 

APRIL 15 I GET A LETTER STATING THAT I CANT ASK FOR AN INCREASE BECAUSE ITS STILL UNDER APPEAL AND HASNT BEEN DECIDED YET. WELL OBVIOUSLY FALSE SO I SENT AN EMAIL IRIS TO SAN DIEGO RO AND GOT A CALL BACK FROM A GUY NAMED DON.

APRIL 19 PHONE CALL. DON TELLS ME THAT THE LETTER SENT WAS WRONG AND HE APOLOGIZES. SAYS HE TOOK A LOOK AT MY FUNCTIONAL LOSS ARGUMENT ABOUT THE RATER NOT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT AND HE SEES THAT THEY SHOULD INCREASE ME BUT HE IS REFERRING THIS TO THE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION BECAUSE THIS IS AN ADMINISTRATIVE CUE... I SAID FINE.

APRIL 25  I SEE THAT EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS CLAIM/ NOW CUE HAS DISAPEERED AND THERES NO INFO. SO I CALL 1-800 THEY TELL ME THAT ITS CLOSED AND IT WAS A PREMATURE CLAIM. SO I SEND ANOTHER IRIS AND THE SAME GUY CALLS BACK DON FROM SAN DIEGO RO.

HE SAYS THAT THE APPEALS MANAGEMENT AT WASHINGTON D.C. DIDNT TAKE HIM UP ON HIS REQUEST TO CUE THEMSELVES. SO HE GOT EVEN MORE HIGHER UPS IN SAN DIEGO TO SEND THIS BACK TO THEM AND FORCE THEM TO CUE THEMSELVES. 

MAY 8 I GET AN EMAIL FROM VSO IN D.C. SAYING THAT THIS CUE SHOULD BE CHANGED TO A CLAIM FOR INCREASE BECAUSE ITS TO HARD TO WIN A CUE AT THE LEVEL OF THE BVA.  I CALLED HIM AND SAID NO PLEASE LOOK AT MY EVIDENCE AND I POINTED IT OUT AND HE SAID GEE. OK.. I SEE THIS... SO YES THE CUE SHOULD GO AHEAD.

MAY 16 I NOTICE I HAVE A REOPEND CLAIM FROM THAT 03/05/18 CLAIM FOR INCREASE. I CALL 1-800 THEY SAY THERES NO WAY FOR THEM TO FIND OUT WHAT JURISDICTION IS WORKING IT BUT THEY ASSURE ME THAT ITS IN THE CORRECT PLACE..

MAY 25 I WAS GRANTED AN INCREASE FOR THE 5252 FOR ABDUCTION WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE REOPENED CLAIM OF MAY 16. RATER ONLY USING LATESTS C&P FORM 2018 AND TOOK THE WHOLE THING AS A CLAIM NOT A CUE AND THIS WAS DONE FROM THE SAN DIEGO OFFICE .... TELLS ME  THAT THE CUE WAS NEVER EVEN LOOKED AT.

 

Edited by paulcolrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Similar Content

    • By owen99
      Board of Appeals:  Direct Review docket- what month are they on? I know they review appeals based on the docket of the month the appeal was started. It is possible to find out what month they are on at the Board of appeals to try and judge to see how long my appeal will take to be reviewed?
    • By SPO
      Does anyone have any clue what the current date of AMA appeals the board is working?  I know I can find the current legacy date in the appeals metrics, but they don't say anything about AMA.
    • By overthere
      Dont know if Im in the right spot, have spent hours trying to figure out how to use this site
      I read "6 reasons to keep pursuing va claims and appeals - AFTER you reach 100%".   Im rated 100% P&T tdui from 'Nam days.   but clicking on it brings  "10 tips to help you keep the c and p exam in perspective".  Is it hidden somewhere else, or not here at all?
      and man, its tough reading and understanding lots of stuff on here.... abbreviations. "secondary" conditions,  one thing caused by another....code numbers, medical/technical names.   there must be a bunch of lists somewhere?  Im a 'regular' type guy, but lots of stuff I have read makes me feel pretty dumb trying to understand things.   and now I cant recall the title of this 'forum' for this question, and I looked back, cant find the name of it anywhere, this site is so confusing.
    • By Mr cue
      Ok I understand many feel I just be posting and fighting with va over nothing.
      My old name on hadit was yulooking.
      You can put it in the search and my old post for the cue claim I won will pop up.
      Carlie Berta many other help me and I learn alot from hadit I had no ideal what a cue was until I followed Berta cue back than
      I also used hadit back than to vent lol
      I post all this so that other understand I feel I have more year fight va than some lawyers. And vso
       
      I have been to the court pro se twice. And won remands for both.
      Fast forward. I am now fight for smc benfits that were never inferred back in 2001.
      Might go back till 1993.
      This is why va is all over the place.
      I was granted smc l aid attendance.
      But I receive in home care pay for by va hospital. Which is smc r.
      All this I got remand from the court to bva to address.
      And it been nothing but games 
       
      I now have a petition at the cavc which I am just waiting on judge decision on
      I got be the first veteran we're a bva judge stated if I refuse a exam base opinion on my record.
      So yes I don't wait I push.
      Qtc I put in a better business complaint yesterday and call white house line
      Today I get a call from qtc I don't have to go to exam and they got to base there opinion on my record.
      I would never tell a veteran to refuse a exam!
      The reason I can refuse is because my bva remand state this. Because
      I press the bva about having 8 comp Exam for smc benfits. Which are to b based off your record.
      I really just venting.
      Last thing guys if you get a cavc remand.   send these law to bva before they remand. To ro.
      A cavc is not a do over.
       
      Someiano v. Principi, 17 Vet.App. 305, 312 (2003) (Court noted that it would not be permissible for VA to undertake further development if purpose was to obtain evidence against appellant’s case)

      Adam v. Principi, 256 F.3d 1318 (Fed. Cir. 2001), (in which the court stated that it would be improper for the Veterans Court to remand a case to the Board to give the DVA another opportunity to develop evidence needed to satisfy an evidentiary burden it had failed to satisfy the first time, i.e., to “attempt to introduce new evidence sufficient to make up the shortfall” in the agency’s proof. Id. At 1322.”
       
      The board has remand my loss of use under smc to develop evidence to denied loss of use.
      I have a 25 year record of loss of use. I have a va specialized loss of use exam that Address all my loss of use and stated it was the result of my elbow and cervical injury It was a favorable exam. I have bva decision which address my lost of use 2001 2004 and 2012.
      Use the law against them.
       
       
       
       
       
    • By andrewdc
      I found Alex on this site almost 4 years ago. I had posted multiple questions as to why VA denied my aid and attendance claim SMC L.  Alex contacted me and agreed to help. He filed a new claim for smc l and of course va denied it. He then filed appeal to bva which was subsequently granted and I was awarded smc L. However I have 2 separate and distinct 100% ratings so I should have been awarded smc M. So, Alex submitted  appeal to bva which after a year they closed appeal because they thought we were appealing original bva decision. We were not appealing decision just the m versus l. So Alex filed a new claim for m and va denied. Alex filed supplemental claim and va closed the claim without even adjudicating. He filed Again and same result. He made another attempt and that was denied too. Finally Alex contacted the secretary bva, the regional office coaches and raters claiming they had no idea how to adjudicate smc claims.  Obviously he ruffled a few feathers and the truth needed to be said. Finally after more than 36 months of fighting, the VA admitted making 2 mistakes. They admitted the effective date for my original l should have been 6 months earlier and they admitted m should have been awarded when aid and attendance was granted. Bottom line- Alex knows more than va when it comes to SMC. Alex is a kind person who always listed to our concerns and always keep us in the loop. If you need thoughtful assistance with your smc and or claims in general, no one knows better than our friend Alex. 
       
       Andrew & Linda
       
       
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • I already get compensation for bladder cancer for Camp Lejeune Water issue, now that it is added to Agent Orange does it mean that the VA should pay me the difference between Camp Lejeune and 1992 when I retired from the Marine Corps or do I have to re-apply for it for Agent Orange, or will the VA look at at current cases already receiving bladder cancer compensation. I’m considered 100% Disabled Permanently 
      • 20 replies
    • 5,10, 20 Rule
      The 5, 10, 20 year rules...



      Five Year Rule) If you have had the same rating for five or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless your condition has improved on a sustained basis. All the medical evidence, not just the reexamination report, must support the conclusion that your improvement is more than temporary.



      Ten Year Rule) The 10 year rule is after 10 years, the service connection is protected from being dropped.



      Twenty Year Rule) If your disability has been continuously rated at or above a certain rating level for 20 or more years, the VA cannot reduce your rating unless it finds the rating was based on fraud. This is a very high standard and it's unlikely the rating would get reduced.



      If you are 100% for 20 years (Either 100% schedular or 100% TDIU - Total Disability based on Individual Unemployability or IU), you are automatically Permanent & Total (P&T). And, that after 20 years the total disability (100% or IU) is protected from reduction for the remainder of the person's life. "M-21-1-IX.ii.2.1.j. When a P&T Disability Exists"



      At 55, P&T (Permanent & Total) or a few other reasons the VBA will not initiate a review. Here is the graphic below for that. However if the Veteran files a new compensation claim or files for an increase, then it is YOU that initiated to possible review.



      NOTE: Until a percentage is in place for 10 years, the service connection can be removed. After that, the service connection is protected.



      ------



      Example for 2020 using the same disability rating



      1998 - Initially Service Connected @ 10%



      RESULT: Service Connection Protected in 2008



      RESULT: 10% Protected from reduction in 2018 (20 years)



      2020 - Service Connection Increased @ 30%



      RESULT: 30% is Protected from reduction in 2040 (20 years)
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 58 replies
    • Post in New BVA Grants
      While the BVA has some discretion here, often they "chop up claims".  For example, BVA will order SERVICE CONNECTION, and leave it up to the VARO the disability percent and effective date.  

      I hate that its that way.  The board should "render a decision", to include service connection, disability percentage AND effective date, so we dont have to appeal "each" of those issues over then next 15 years on a hamster wheel.  
        • Like
    • Finally heard back that I received my 100% Overall rating and a 100% PTSD rating Following my long appeal process!

      My question is this, given the fact that my appeal was on the advanced docket and is an “Expedited” appeal, what happens now and how long(ish) is the process from here on out with retro and so forth? I’ve read a million things but nothing with an expedited appeal status.

      Anyone deal with this situation before? My jump is from 50 to 100 over the course of 2 years if that helps some. I only am asking because as happy as I am, I would be much happier to pay some of these bills off!
        • Like
      • 18 replies
    • I told reviewer that I had a bad C&P, and that all I wanted was a fair shake, and she even said, that was what she was all ready viewed for herself. The first C&P don't even  reflect my Treatment in the VA PTSD clinic. In my new C&P I was only asked about symptoms, seeing shit, rituals, nightmares, paying bills and about childhood, but didn't ask about details of it. Just about twenty question, and  nothing about stressor,
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Fund HadIt.com

    406%
    $6,103.00 of $1,500.00 Donate Now
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines