Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Rated Disabilities - List

Rate this question


Ray C

Question

Could someone take a look at the attached list of rated disabilities that resulted from my March 15, 2018 claim that was just completed this week and in accordance with the VA, I am now at 90% disability . I took a screen shot of this list from Ebenefits.   I haven't received the rating decision letter yet and I wanted to confirm that the VA correctly took into account the "Bilateral Factor" for the SCD's that involve the lower extremities and the 90% combined disability is spot on.

I thank you in advance.

Ray

Rated Disabilities - March 15, 2018 Claim.docx

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You have (2) "Bilateral Factor"  calculations, Hips and shins, I came up with a CSC of 85.667 rounded to 90% CSC. An Increase or New SC that would result in the CSC  bump (9.333) from the 85.667 to 95, rounded to 100% CSC will be very difficult.      Start thinking IU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
2 hours ago, Gastone said:

You have (2) "Bilateral Factor"  calculations, Hips and shins, I came up with a CSC of 85.667 rounded to 90% CSC. An Increase or New SC that would result in the CSC  bump (9.333) from the 85.667 to 95, rounded to 100% CSC will be very difficult.      Start thinking IU.

Hello Gastone,

I appreciate your assistance but let me run something by you. My calculations come out to 88%. Not that it makes a difference in achieving the 90% combined disability but I just want to understand the VA math.  Following is my calculation.

I grouped all the SCD's that involved the lower extremities even though not all are not described as "Bilateral Conditions" in the disability list. Can I not count all lower extremity SCD's towards the Bilateral Factor ?   I see you mentioned that you used Hips and shins, which did you use for the shins, femoral or sciatic ?

20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 10 = 70% + 7% (bilateral) = 77%

77% + Non Bilateral SCD's - 40 + 10 + 10 = 88%

Once I receive the rating decision letter and analyze it's contents, I intend to ask for a reconsideration/appeal for the Diabetes and the rest of the arthritic hip conditions.

Thanks again for your help.

Ray

Edited by Ray C
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Each pair of "BL" SC's are combined using VA Math then the 10% Factor is applied. If you have 2+ "BL" SCs, each pair's separate CSC is calculated before computing the Vet's actual CSC.

Your Rating Letter will address exactly which SCs received the BL 10% Factor. Post a redacted copy when you have time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

i was just doing same type of math on mine because i thought they made mistake in bilat...

turns out that just like gastone said,,,, each is combined first then a 10% is add so ,,,

two 20's are not 40...there 36

in other words....

if your rated for two 10's that combines to 19 (not 20) and then the 10% bilat gives you 21% (not 22%) and so on and so forth...

it also seems as if you did what i did and group your bilats as 1 big disability instead of combining each then plugging into the va percentage math reduction process.

Edited by paulcolrain
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
On 5/27/2018 at 10:46 AM, Gastone said:

Each pair of "BL" SC's are combined using VA Math then the 10% Factor is applied. If you have 2+ "BL" SCs, each pair's separate CSC is calculated before computing the Vet's actual CSC.

Your Rating Letter will address exactly which SCs received the BL 10% Factor. Post a redacted copy when you have time.

 

Hello Gastone,

I first posted this inquiry about 2 weeks ago and I was out of town until today. I received the attached VA rating decision letter today when I went to the post office to grab my mail that I had on hold.  

Anyhoo, as a summary to my initial inquiry, I wanted to know why the VA didn't grant me Bi-lateral factor ratings for both the femoral and sciatic nerve SCD's when both the left and right lower extremities are affected ?

radiculopathy, femoral nerve, left lower extremity - 20%
radiculopathy, femoral nerve, right lower extremity - 20%

radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, left lower extremity - 20%
radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, right lower extremity - 20%  - I don't get paragraph 7 where the finding seems to repeat itself "Evaluation of radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, right lower extremity (previously rated as radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, right lower extremity)


I appreciate your assistance with this in advance.  If you rather discuss via PM, that will be fine.

Thanks,

Ray

 

VA Rating Decision - May 18, 2018.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Will have to eyeball the decision. Keep in mind, you won't see the "Bi-Lateral" factor, it's used only for computing your CSC Rating.  Take all the SC% listed and forget about the "B-Factor, just run from highest to lowest using the Hadit Comp Calculator. Then run the same as B-Factor SC's, what the CSC before Rounding up or down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use