Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just got my appeal won but they reopened a denial from 2008-why

Rate this question


Dave143mtg4life

Question

I just got my appeal for my smc won last week and my retro deposited. Right after that I checked ebenefits and it says open claims and it says new claim from 2008. I called ebenefits and it says it’s a new claim but it’s an internal new claim from a denial they gave me in 2008. How would they do that and why? I am already 100 percent and maxed out on my smc so why would they look at my denials from 2008 and why would they open a denied claim from that time without even telling me they were?  Does that mean it will be approved but that won’t change my money or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Congratulations on your win!!!  If hadit members or Tbird or this site helped you, remember Tbird..she asked for donations because she needs them.  Having this site hosted is "not" free.  

Did you get the VARO decision?  That may tell you why.  

Possible:  SMC K, or sometimes Vets keep on a going with new SC's even when maxed out because, if you die from a SC condition your spouse can get DIC.  It is also possible that it helps you if some of your other conditions improve and you get a reduction.  

What the VARO calls "moot", sometimes is "not moot".  In my case, when I got awarded 100 percent, they said TDIU was "moot".  I appealed, because my claim for TDIU "could" result in an earlier effective date (it did, upon appeals) and because TDIU can become a bases for SMC S. 

So, they could have reopened something that was in error, which "could" result in an earlier effective date for SMC S.   The VA has a duty to "maximize your benefits", but, of course that usually means they lowball you.  

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

In 2008 they denied me for one condition for my lower back. I then got approved for multiple conditions in 2010 which made me 100 percent with Housebound and smc L. I just got my appeal awarded because I had tbi and seizures at 100 percent so they awarded me the max smc at smc t 2 so they can’t smc me any higher than that but once the appeal was granted it opened up a denial from 2008. I just didn’t know why because it wouldn’t change my percentage because I have 5 disabilities at 100 percent and maxed out on my smc unless the the change of the change of the denial from 2008 would of given me an approval than I would of gotten some money from 2008 to the increase in 2010 when I became 100 percent. I just didn’t understand why they would open it and why they wouldn’t even tell me or is that normal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

What did the VARO decision say the reason for reopening it was?  If you have not gotten it yet, then you will have to wait for the envelope.  

According to VA's website, yes your comp maxes out at T2.  https://www.benefits.va.gov/compensation/resources_comp02.asp

 

Its a over 8000 per month, so your retro check should be hefty if it was very many months.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi. I got the letter for the approval and yes it is for smc t2. It was for 23 months so it was a good thing. It didn’t say why they reopened a denial from 2008 or why or that they even were. I just had a weird itch to look on ebenefits and it said open claim from 2008. I called the va and they said that it was an internal claim from the denial from 2008 that was opened. Didn’t know they could do that or why they would even do that. All that would happen would I would get another retro from 2008-2010 for what they denied me for that disability but was wondering if they even do that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

"Sometimes" they do that.  You see, SMC is always an inferred claim, so  you dont have to apply.  Your effective date is the "date you met the critiera". 

Now that I know you are reading from ebenefts, basically no one knows what/if will be posted on ebenefits as its notoriously unreliable.  If in doubt, remember I told you that ebenefits is unreliable.   

Yes, its possible you met the criteria earlier, or there could be a "middle ground", that is, SMC that is more than you were getting, but less than R2, depending upon your disabilities, and when they occurred.   This is referred to as "Fenderson" or "staged ratings".  You know, they award 50 percent from 2003 to 2005, then from 2005 to 2010, its 70, percent and after 2010 its 100 percent, for example.  The same can happen with SMC..you could be eligible for a higher level than what you got in 2008.  

It is cue for the VA "not" to infer SMC when you meet the applicable criteria.  

So, yes its possible you have retro coming if the claim opened in 2008 is decided in your favor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thank you for that information. Also how do I contribute to this website for this valuable information. I always have questions and my vso takes months to talk to. Yes your information is information and you might tell me it’s just that but what you said made me realize and understand it so I now am not scared that what they just approved me for my 2 year smc for the appeal won’t be taken away. I got scared that after two years and the approval they open a case for some totally different thing that makes no sense from a denial from 2008. You know the saying. Once you get what you want don’t keep putting in claims or you open up a can of worms so I didn’t understand why it would just open a claim 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use