Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Veteran Claim Status Adjudicated Differently

Rate this question


Sailorman

Question

I have posted part of this issue before but not in detail. I need additional information, so I’m posting once again. In hopes to get the assistance I need after post more detail. 

Here it goes: I have had numerous claims submitted since being discharged. Let’s say, 5 claims that was submitted soon after I was discharged the VARO failed to properly adjudicate my Theater service in these claims. However, the VARO did, however, adjudicate my Theater service since then correctly.  

My first 5 claims have be in an open appeal   but the issue of Theater service has not been raised thus far at the BVA.  The only issue that have been raise thus far are a higher %. 

What are your thoughts and or opinions? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Lead Moderator

Unfortunately, the VA LOOOVES to seperate each issue in order to drag out awarding you benefits for as long as possible.  

Often you have to fight them on multiple issues such as:

1.  Denial of service connection

2.  Disability percentage

3.  effective dates.  

      However, if you keep "the appeal alive" by following all the timeliness rules, you should maintain the "pending" claim so that you can potentially earn benefits back to day one.   If you mess up one time, it can end your claim.  Remember you have 2 deadlines for appeals, not one.  

1.  You have to file a nod within a year.

2.  You have to file the I9 within 60 days of the SOC.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Theatre " service might only be an issue for claims that would fall under the presumptives.

(such as AO presumptives)

It should not be an issue  for claims under Chronic Presumptives regulations.

Can you scan and attach here at least one of their decisions, that you filed soon after discharge, that also did not account for Theatre service?   (cover C file # and name prior to scanning it)

I dont see how it could raise the percentages you have now.

But-I really dont understand your question-

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't understand his question either Ms berta

''Here it goes: I have had numerous claims submitted since being discharged. Let’s say, 5 claims that was submitted soon after I was discharged the VARO failed to properly adjudicate my Theater service in these claims. However, the VARO did, however, adjudicate my Theater service since then correctly.''  

As I take it they were looking at some higher rated claims or claims issues%  but  he  has other claims still in appeals from his duty time in Theatre service at the BVA?

but he speaks of his Theater claims not being adjudicated  maybe he is filing a PTSD Claim and not showing his hostile Theater service medals like CIB? for his stressors for his stressor proof or its not on his DD 214  (Just taking a guess?)

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

he speaks of his Theater claims not being adjudicated  maybe he is filing a PTSD Claim and not showing his hostile Theater service medals like CIB? for his stressors for his stressor proof or its not on his DD 214  (Just taking a guess?)"

Buck- you are right-that is a very good guess-but I think he gets SC for a MH issue already-

I  also think Sailorman is referring to these issues:

https://community.hadit.com/topic/71730-2014-claims-reopened/?page=2

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

OIC , Roger That!

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I’m sorry for the confusion. Let me try to clean things up and be more clear. 

 

I wasn’t awarded 100 percent until 2012. The VA did not begin adjudicating my claims and considering my claims under Gulf-war service until 2004. However, I have had 5 claims in appeal since 1996 that was never considered or adjudicated under Gulf-war service. The claims were decided under peacetime service instead. 

 

I won on the 5 claims the first time at the BVA.  I was granted ED of 8/1987...10% for ankles and 20% for back. I’m appealing for an increase and hopes that I can raise an argument on presumptive service or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use