Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Question about Appeal Process

Rate this question


Austin0520

Question

Hi Everyone,

Thanks again to everyone for contributing their experience on this site, it has been so helpful in getting through the process! 

My claim was recently denied (again). This time, for the first time, I appealed and decided to get help from Dr. Bash and a lawyer. I’ve been battling these claims on and off for 5 years and this was my last try...had to make it a good one.

My question is what happens next? I just filed the NOD and the lawyer submitted the form requesting a DRO. Does anyone know how long is it taking these days for a response from the DRO? Is this where I wait 3-5 years? Just not sure what to expect from the appeal process. 

Also, does anyone know how long the CUE process takes? I’m assuming the 3-5 years or longer?

Thank you again to everyone for sharing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

You can file a CUE on the recent decision-if it contains a legal error-

but, can you scan and attach the recent denial here to include the evidence list they used.

"Also, does anyone know how long the CUE process takes? I’m assuming the 3-5 years or longer?"

Most of my CUEs and one I filed for my daughter took mere weeks ( on decisions that we had just received.Resolved favorably)

My longest CUEs, one filed in 2003 and another filed in 2004 took until 2012 to be awarded.

None of my CUEs went to the BVA- I sure hoped the 2003-2004 CUEs would get there- but they were awarded just prior to transfer ( by a different RO)

Cover your  file, name, address prior to scanning it. I really dont think it contains CUE but ,since you brought up CUE, it is always best to check...

 

 

 

Edited by Berta
added more info

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Forgot to ask- has your lawyer mentioned a potential CUE?

They would know right away if the decision contains CUE and could help prepare a CUE claim.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The time that it takes is relative.  I have heard of BVA cases being cleared in five years, mine took ten.  It has a lot to do with your RO.  The Nashville RO is slow. Good luck and I hope yours is fast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Berta,

Thank you for the response, you always have great information.

Dr Bash recommended I file the CUE for a decision back in 2004. I was diagnosed with reactive hypoglycemia while on active duty. I was rated at 0% with the reason that I was not on a restricted diet. I have notes from the endocrinologist and dietician about the diet I needed to maintain to prevent hypoglycemic episodes (passing out). I’m not sure it’s a CUE, but I’m going to try.

I only submitted my package and file to the lawyer a few weeks ago so I think he’s still sorting everything out. He thought I had a good chance, but no guarantees of course. 🙂

Thank you again!! It feels so nice to have support here.

Edited by Austin0520
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Berta,

Thank you for the response, you always have great information.

Dr Bash recommended I file the CUE for a decision back in 2004. I was diagnosed with reactive hypoglycemia while on active duty. I was rated at 0% with the reason that I was not on a restricted diet. I have notes from the endocrinologist and dietician about the diet I needed to maintain to prevent hypoglycemic episodes (passing out). I’m not sure it’s a CUE, but I’m going to try.

I only submitted my package and file to the lawyer a few weeks ago so I think he’s still sorting everything out. He thought I had a good chance, but no guarantees of course. 🙂

Thank you again!! It feels so nice to have support here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Dr  B will definitely recognize a potential CUE if he sees one!

Here is a Reactive Hypoglycemia award:

https://www.va.gov/vetapp15/files5/1541760.txt

The award refers to Dr "B" ,who provided an IMO/IME but I dont know if that is Craig or not.

Dr Craig Bash did 2 IMos for me-VA refused to read them, that's OK the BVA sure read them.

This was a claim -of which I have never seen anything similiar.

My husband ( Vietnam 65-66) had never been diagnosed or treated for DMII.

I did extensive research to iclude all of my husband's  medical records and prepared my lay opinion with tabbed references to the med recs for Dr. Bash to consider.

I also wanted him to consider the wrongful death award I had because VA had malpracticed on him for heart disease, stroke, wrong meds, admitting they caused his death, etc so it was "as likely as not" they were negligent in diagnosing and treating his DM as well and it also contributed to his death.

He had his opinion done in a matter of days. I knew BVA can read and they would award.

My husband did get a DM diagnosis ( but the medical bastards were trying to cover up the malpractice at another VA hosp and crossed out the entry.) I found the doctor who made that entry and he remembered my husband and had left VA to start a private practice. He gave me a freebee IMO before I contacted Dr Bash and that sealed the deal.

Your case makes me recall what Dr Bash said to me after getting my very first email to me with just a few mentions of my evidence.

He said "Sounds Good!" and that is what I need to say to you regarding your claim-

Sounds GOOD!

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use