Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

SF 95 first step in FTCA


In light of the Fayetteville pathologist malpractice snafu, Jerrel Cook ( our radio show producer) and I discussed whether any affected veteran should file an SF 95 right away-

I have been emailing some vet lawyers to get their take on that- this Fayetteville situation is worse than any past similar VA problems...except maybe for the Phoenix crap-

  The SF 95  must be prepared properly. This article gives some info on that :


I studied all FTCA law before I filed mine-late December 1995-with some of my medical evidence attached to it .The Regional Counsel (now called District Counsels)called me up in May 1996 to begin negotiations. He had already obtained a Peer Review that supported my charges.Then much went wrong- that's OK -it was resolved anyhow.

It is best to have a lawyer to fill out the SF95 but you have the right to do it yourself.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

The VA only identified and notified seven veteran misdiagnosis. If you are not one of the seven, then you are going to need a very good attorney.


There about 100 lawsuits filed against Mark Wisner, physician assistant and the VA won't settle any of those cases. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://amp.kshb.com/2528830526/number-of-abuse-lawsuits-against-ex-va-worker-mark-wisner-approaches-100.html&ved=0ahUKEwjWkeOvmvrbAhUDvFkKHV5sAhsQyM8BCCQwAA&usg=AOvVaw2hLcvLmgiZWX82NRDdAFZr&ampcf=1

Edited by Solo

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

There is going to be a bunch of veterans trying to cash in on this. This could be the largest group of people trying to sue the VA.


Berta,  the VA recoup all the FTCA settlement money from your DIC benefits. They didn't lose much. The SF-95 forms the VA general counsel settles are mostly recovered by the VA.

Edited by Solo

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

You are incorrect-I got ALL of my DIC AND FTCA settlement.They lost plenty of CASH....and they owe me more under a OG Pres Op- too involved to explain here-

You are sure right about this :

"This could be the largest group of people trying to sue the VA."

I mentioned this to the malpractice attorney  I know of in Arkansas - possible Class Action,and he said his firm is considering that.

At first the VA withheld my entire settlement-as I mentioned here before I fought them but they ignored my letters until I re-opened my claim.

The Regional ( now District Counsel) called a CUE on them-when he saw my letters to them in my C file- they had to pay me quite a  bit that  they erroneously withdrew.


They had recouped the Offset I agreed to with General Counsel-but muh more erroneously -

I didnt negotiate for a full offset of the whole settlement-then -

when I proved direct death due to 2 Agent Orange disabilities they malpracticed on, I got my FULL offset refunded to me-

Mayby I am only FTCAer that had that experience -I dont know-

"The VA only identified and notified seven veteran misdiagnosis. If you are not one of the seven, then you are going to need a very good attorney."

That is 7 misdiagosed vets and 2 potential wrongful deaths - SO FAR-

I confirmed that with a Congressman yesterday who is looking into this.

Any veteran or survivor who gets the letter ,needs to obtain their complete VA medical records.

I can put them in touch with  "a very good attorney." His malpractice firm has had plenty of calls already.

there are 19,574 living  veterans medical records they (VA)need to go through-

there are over 5,000 deceased veterans records they need to go through- they have only gone through about 900 individual veterans files so far-





Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

to add-

"There about 100 lawsuits filed against Mark Wisner, physician assistant and the VA won't settle any of those cases"

Why would they-

The cases I am aware of against Mark Wisner are Civil lawsuits.

FTCA is Federal law- BIG difference. 

If any of his victims have had documented emotional or physical damage from him they can file SF 95 - or if the Statute of Limits is gone, they can file a Section 1151 claim.

A local family stopped me as I left a local restaurant last night-their son had been arrested and the court dismissed the case last week...they wanted to come over and talk to me about what they should do- but I had to tell them they needed a civil attorney- I only know federal law under  FTCA.

Of course I told them  their son should sue the people who had him arrested- there are plenty of lawyers around here who could help them.




"Mark Wisner is facing 13 civil lawsuits in federal court. After Friday, that number could skyrocket."

(source- th lik you posted)

Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines