Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

SF 95 first step in FTCA


Berta

Question

In light of the Fayetteville pathologist malpractice snafu, Jerrel Cook ( our radio show producer) and I discussed whether any affected veteran should file an SF 95 right away-

I have been emailing some vet lawyers to get their take on that- this Fayetteville situation is worse than any past similar VA problems...except maybe for the Phoenix crap-

  The SF 95  must be prepared properly. This article gives some info on that :

https://community.hadit.com/topic/2337-filing-a-tort-claim-1151-claim/

I studied all FTCA law before I filed mine-late December 1995-with some of my medical evidence attached to it .The Regional Counsel (now called District Counsels)called me up in May 1996 to begin negotiations. He had already obtained a Peer Review that supported my charges.Then much went wrong- that's OK -it was resolved anyhow.

It is best to have a lawyer to fill out the SF95 but you have the right to do it yourself.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 16
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Here is the SF 95 FORM

https://www.va.gov/OGC/docs/SF-95.pdf

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The VA only identified and notified seven veteran misdiagnosis. If you are not one of the seven, then you are going to need a very good attorney.

 

There about 100 lawsuits filed against Mark Wisner, physician assistant and the VA won't settle any of those cases. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://amp.kshb.com/2528830526/number-of-abuse-lawsuits-against-ex-va-worker-mark-wisner-approaches-100.html&ved=0ahUKEwjWkeOvmvrbAhUDvFkKHV5sAhsQyM8BCCQwAA&usg=AOvVaw2hLcvLmgiZWX82NRDdAFZr&ampcf=1

Edited by Solo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

There is going to be a bunch of veterans trying to cash in on this. This could be the largest group of people trying to sue the VA.

 

Berta,  the VA recoup all the FTCA settlement money from your DIC benefits. They didn't lose much. The SF-95 forms the VA general counsel settles are mostly recovered by the VA.

Edited by Solo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

You are incorrect-I got ALL of my DIC AND FTCA settlement.They lost plenty of CASH....and they owe me more under a OG Pres Op- too involved to explain here-

You are sure right about this :

"This could be the largest group of people trying to sue the VA."

I mentioned this to the malpractice attorney  I know of in Arkansas - possible Class Action,and he said his firm is considering that.

At first the VA withheld my entire settlement-as I mentioned here before I fought them but they ignored my letters until I re-opened my claim.

The Regional ( now District Counsel) called a CUE on them-when he saw my letters to them in my C file- they had to pay me quite a  bit that  they erroneously withdrew.

 

They had recouped the Offset I agreed to with General Counsel-but muh more erroneously -

I didnt negotiate for a full offset of the whole settlement-then -

when I proved direct death due to 2 Agent Orange disabilities they malpracticed on, I got my FULL offset refunded to me-

Mayby I am only FTCAer that had that experience -I dont know-

"The VA only identified and notified seven veteran misdiagnosis. If you are not one of the seven, then you are going to need a very good attorney."

That is 7 misdiagosed vets and 2 potential wrongful deaths - SO FAR-

I confirmed that with a Congressman yesterday who is looking into this.

Any veteran or survivor who gets the letter ,needs to obtain their complete VA medical records.

I can put them in touch with  "a very good attorney." His malpractice firm has had plenty of calls already.

there are 19,574 living  veterans medical records they (VA)need to go through-

there are over 5,000 deceased veterans records they need to go through- they have only gone through about 900 individual veterans files so far-

 

 

 

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

to add-

"There about 100 lawsuits filed against Mark Wisner, physician assistant and the VA won't settle any of those cases"

Why would they-

The cases I am aware of against Mark Wisner are Civil lawsuits.

FTCA is Federal law- BIG difference. 

If any of his victims have had documented emotional or physical damage from him they can file SF 95 - or if the Statute of Limits is gone, they can file a Section 1151 claim.

A local family stopped me as I left a local restaurant last night-their son had been arrested and the court dismissed the case last week...they wanted to come over and talk to me about what they should do- but I had to tell them they needed a civil attorney- I only know federal law under  FTCA.

Of course I told them  their son should sue the people who had him arrested- there are plenty of lawyers around here who could help them.

 

 

 

"Mark Wisner is facing 13 civil lawsuits in federal court. After Friday, that number could skyrocket."

(source- th lik you posted)

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The lawsuits against the United States and Mark Wisner are all FTCA. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9016926488166260840&q=ftca+veteran&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

You got a settlement during the administrative process.  You don't know what come next. Everyone must exhaust their administrative remedy before they can file a FTCA lawsuit in the US District Court.

I filed my FTCA lawsuit pro se in the US District Court.  The US Attorney's Office have 3 weeks left to answer my complaint. The US Attorney's Office is more experienced at litigating under FTCA than the VA General Counsel, and VA Chief Counsel. The VA General Counsel and VA Chief Counsel only handle the administrative process. The US Attorney's Office handles your FTCA complaint in the US District Court.

The VA's defense will be that the pathologist was not acting within the scope of his employment. His intoxication isn't in furtherance of the employer business. The intoxication was for his personal gratification. The VA  and the US Attorney's Office will also use the State's statute of repose as a defense.

Edited by Solo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use