Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Need Advice - active duty surgery had to be reversed after retirement and related complications

Rate this question


JeanBean217

Question

Hello Hadit community.  I am new and think this is the place I can find some answers.  I'll try to make my question/scenario as brief as possible, because I know it's hard to keep reading long and complicated posts.  Here is my status and questions.

I retired in 2012.  Had an initial DR of 60%, later it was raised to 90% due to worsening PTSD (from 30% to 70%) and a couple of minor issues I had appealed.  I would like to file a new claim, based on a surgery I had in service for voiding dysfunction.  In 2010, I had a hysterectomy, combined with an A&P repair and a bladder sling.  The bladder sling corrected my voiding dysfunction.  Fast forward several year, I am retired and using Tricare as my insurance.  I had complications from the bladder sling.  It had moved through tissues in my body, and began to protrude into my vagina.  It had to be removed.  A civilian doctor did the surgery and removed the sling, which, caused my voiding dysfunction to return.  It has been a couple of years since this surgery, and I have not done any claim with the VA.  I tried to look up on e-benefits, my award letter, but apparently, they are either down right now, or I'm not looking in the right place, because I can't get anything to come up.  They may have either given me a SC at 0% for the bladder dysfunction, or they may have not rated it at all, totally overlooking that part of the surgery.  So, here are my questions.

1.  If I open a claim for the voiding dysfunction, will they then reevaluate all my other ratings?  I really don't want to go through that, and risk loosing what I have.

2.  Can I do a FDC, if I have all the medical records from the surgery to install the bladder sling (SR), and the ones showing that it needed to be removed and the surgery to remove it (Tricare/civilian doc).

3.  When I'm able to review my award letters, and if I find they totally overlooked this condition, and it was never rated or SC at all, is it considered a CUE?  (I don't believe they can combine a hysterectomy rating with a voiding dysfunction rating, even if they were performed during the same surgery.  Is that right?)

4.  If it is a CUE, I'm assuming there are other posts on here that explain how to handle that.  Can someone direct me to the correct page, if it is indeed a CUE?

I am a bit paranoid about messing with my rating and bringing attention to myself.  But I'm a single mom, not working, living off of my retirement and VA money.  I can't afford to have my rating lowered.  But I certainly could use the benefit of being 100%, as far as property taxes are concerned.  I'm in TX.  I will have to post my ratings here as well, as I have a hard time understanding if I can even reach 100% because of the crazy way they add up percentages.  It seems impossible to be 100%, and I wonder if doing another claim will even be worth it.  I also am unsure about IU.  Being at 90%, should I have awarded me IU or is that something I should ask for?

Edited by JeanBean217
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Welcome - I am a CUerino- and have much advice here in our CUE forum.I think solid CUEs are the cat's meow🐱

because they are a "front attack" ( per the BVA.) 

But a CUE in your case depends on this award letter that contains on the rating sheet and within their decision:

 "They may have either given me a SC at 0% for the bladder dysfunction, or they may have not rated it at all, totally overlooking that part of the surgery."

And what the outcome is ,if you file a new claim for it.Or re-open the older claim if they did give you gave you a  "0" %

I do feel these are certainly  separate conditions- bladder disability and hysterertomy-the bladder condition  might be rated as aggravated by the surgery to correct the sling problem....and from what I see here ,the bladder problem should be claimed that way.

The award letter should say if the "0" is NSC or SC.Even a Zero SC is far better than "0" NSC.

"Being at 90%, should I have awarded me IU or is that something I should ask for?"

The 70% is for PTSD- is that correct?

Were you employed when they awarded that?

If not they should have considered you for TDIU.

If they didnt- ( we would need to see the award letter)

that would be a CUE basis.

Others can help with your other questions- 

You get TRICARE - so, have you checked out CRDP/CRSC? yet?

I will find the info here on that and post the link for you.

CRDP is supposed to be autyomatic but they do make mistakes-

 

 

 

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

This link should have the skinny on CRSC and also CRDP

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gee- I find I am questioning my own advice above-

In essense this would have to be a new claim (re: the bladder  dysfunction ) because

"The bladder sling corrected my voiding dysfunction.  Fast forward several year, I am retired and using Tricare as my insurance."

So, this was while you were still in the Mil, and VA might  not have rated that- unless they saw it in your SMRs---

but, as I understand it, you left the Mil with no bladder problem...? But

"A civilian doctor did the surgery and removed the sling, which, caused my voiding dysfunction to return.  It has been a couple of years since this surgery, and I have not done any claim with the VA.  "

Someone will opine if they see this differently.

Have you ever appied for SSDI? (Social Security Disability Insurance?

Or VA Voc Rehab?

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Berta.  Thanks for answering.  Sorry if the initial post was a little confusing.  Let me see if I can state it more clearly.

The surgery for the bladder dysfunction was performed while I was active duty, by a military doctor at BAMC, Ft. Sam Houston, TX.  It should be documented in my SMRs.  I say "should", because my medical records can fill two copy paper boxes and I'd have to dig around in them to find it.  The VA knew about it, they obtained the complete copy of my SMR, and all aspects of the surgery were on my list of things that I wanted to be evaluated for when I retired and went through the VA's initial rating process.  I forget the form number, but it basically gave them a list of all my conditions/diagnoses.

It wasn't until after I retired that I began to have complications from the sling.  That is why a civilian doctor did the removal surgery, because I was retired and using Tricare.

Yes, I am currently 70% PTSD.  I haven't looked over my award letters in a few years, so I will have to dig them up. (I thought they would be on e-benefits, but I keep getting error messages on the site.)  The only income I had was from some lesson plans I listed for sale, online.  Certainly not gainful employment.  I don't remember the if VA even asked that question.

I believe I receive CRDP, if I understand it correctly.  Concurrent pay - retirement monthly payment, plus a VA payment.

After my initial claim, I did all my NODs, appeals, etc... on my own.  My representative (I forget the acronym ya'll have for them) was not a lot of help, so I did it on my own.  I ended up winning the three things that I was after.  The VA sided with me in the end and awarded me the ratings.  I did a lot of reading online to help myself through the process.  I bet this site would have been a big help.

No, I haven't applied for SSDI.  I didn't know if I should, since I'm not at 100%, and really don't know where to begin with that.  I was wore out by the time I got finished fighting with the VA last time, and just didn't have it in me to start another big process.  I guess that is why I've let this bladder thing go on for so long without filing anything.  The claims process is just hard, and draining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I was able to find a copy of my first rating decision.  I'm listing everything that was SC, including the updated % since then that I won on appeal:

1.  SC hysterectomy - 30% with SMC

2. SC PTSD - 30%, but is currently 70% after a re-evaluation

3. SC R hip tendinitis - 10%

4. SC tinnitus - 10%

5. SC Bilateral post bunionectomy - 0%, but later won on appeal, because they overlooked the residuals - now rated at 20%

6.  SC L ankle sprain with instability - 0%

7.  SC R ankle sprain with instability - 0%

8. SC Several Scars - 0%

9. SC Scar with persistent open wound - 10% - originally 0% with my other scars, but FDC proved open wound problem

10.  SC urinary stress incontinence - 0%

11. SC post A&P repair - 0%

12.  SC Bilateral conjunctivitis - 0%

13.  SC Atopic Dermatitis - 0% - originally denied, but later won on appeal and rated at 30%

14.  SC Thoracic spondlyosis with scoliosis - 10%

15. SC bilateral pes planus with arthritis - 0%

So, apparently 70, 30, 30, 20, 10, 10, 10, 10 = 92%, according to the calculator I looked at, so I'll need another 30% rating to bring it up to 100%.  I'll have to see what the CFR says about the bladder issue.

Edited by JeanBean217
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Jean Bean217

did you happen to get a rating sheet with your award letter? usually they don't send it but some times they do when a Veteran has muliti claims.

Do you have your ''up dated C-File? if not Request it ASAP.

You need to see what the ratings criteria for each one of these s.c. conditions/disability's rating  are and what the rating codes they gave.

  You can determine if you got a fair rating by the rating criteria set by the CFR'S and the Criteria for what you should be rated at a %

They are suppose to give us Veterans the highest possible rating allowed by law  AND SOME TIMES THE FAIL TO DO THAT  and when we quote these laws back to them...this is what helps us get these increases OR  a fair rating. but we need to know what the rating criteria is.

if this is what your asking ?but don't know how to look the rating criteria up for all your s.c. conditions

I would certainly look up the rating criteria for all your 0% that you got S.C. FOR.

  you should be able to get enough ratings from those alone to boost you up to the 100% level...since you do have some SMC's  if you have not been rated or given the SMC for some of these other conditions  like loss of use of organs, or Drop Foot b/c YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO GET SOME MORE OR HIGHER UP THE SMC LATTER

and yes you may have a possible CUE if you could not work when they rated you the SMC and they knew you couldn't work  that is a possible CUE, but beings you never ask for IU   may present some problems but I think if they knew you could not work because of some of your S.C. Disability's rated over the 40%to 60%  then they should have inferred the IU to you back then.

OTHER MEMBERS CAN CHIME IN

one way or the other we will see that you get your fair ratings.

All is not lost b/c you should get the IU and the retro with it.

Edited by Buck52

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use