Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

How is SMC-K awarded for bilateral mastectomy and total hysterectomy?

Rate this question


Disciple

Question

I'm hoping someone can answer this confusing question for me.  Regarding SMC-K, for a woman who is service connected for total hysterectomy and bilateral mastectomy, how would they compute it?  The language in Section 38 reads for each loss or loss of use so would she receive 3 Ks for the reproductive organs?  Also, would it be 1 K for each breast totaling 2 Ks bringing the overall total to 5Ks?  Thank you in advance for your time and much-appreciated help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

I dont think so.  Even tho men, famously, also have 3 reproductive organs, only 1 SMC K is granted, not 3.  The "other" SMC K's are for loss of use of other things, which are explained here:

 

Quote

 

SMC(K)

The first level of Special Monthly Compensation that we will examine is SMC(k), which has a compensation rate of $105.61 per month. This encompasses loss (amputation) or loss of use of a body part(s) or function(s). This rate applies to each body part lost, or that has loss of use, and can be added to other SMC rates as long as your other SMC qualifying condition is not the same as your SMC(k) or the other rate is capped.

For example, a veteran’s SMC(k) rate is payable for each anatomical loss or loss of use of:

  • One hand
  • One foot
  • Both buttocks
  • One or more creative organs used for reproduction

In addition to:

  • Blindness of one eye whose functionality is only light perception
  • Deafness of both ears
  • Constant inability to communicate by speech
  • Loss of breast tissue

LOSS OF / LOSS OF USE

An SMC(k) rating does not require amputation of a limb. Loss of use in the case of a hand or foot means that no effective function remains that is beyond the capability of an amputation stump below the elbow or knee with use of a suitable prosthetic appliance. This is determined based on the actual remaining function of the hand (i.e. grasping, manipulation of fingers) or foot (balance, movement, etc.).

If a veteran experiences loss of, or loss of use of, a hand or foot due to military service, then a subsequent loss of the other due to non-service connected circumstances, she/he will receive service-connection for both hands/feet. This law also applies to creative organs and eyes.

 


 

Source:  https://cck-law.com/news/special-monthly-compensation-series-smck/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

One SMC for hysterectomy loss, whether it is just the uterus or uterus and one ovary or two ovaries.  

What I cannot find for certain is whether the breast loss is a separate compensable SMC in addition to the hysterectomy.   The plain meaning of the statute is yes, but having trouble finding a case to back that up.   Men do NOT get SMC for breast loss as it is not a creative organ per case law.  Please let me know if someone finds clariity here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

The citation, above says:

Quote

One or more creative organs used for reproduction

I interpret that to mean you can only get "one" SMC K, even tho multiple reproductive organs could be involved.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use