Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Afib and Coffee

Rate this question


Sea_Dog

Question

I have been reading many post at Hadit, and feel like this is one of the best support groups out there for Vets, and thanks for having me.

I am new to the VA claims process and I am working with my local VFW with whole process, but I have a question concerning my claim for Afib. I started having heart palpations during active duty and was put on a holster monitor for 24 hours. The Navy heart Doctor stated that he see the palpations on the holster monitor read out, but thought that they were caused by me drinking 6-8 cups of coffee a day. I went back to sick call 4-5 times for the same issue of palpations through the rest of my career and all is documented in my SMR. After retiring I became very sick and ended up in seeing a heart Doctor and he told me I have had Afib for a long time and had developed a clot in one of the cambers of the heart, so I was put on blood thinners, heart meds, ablations and installed a pacemaker. I filed a VA claim for the Afib, went to the C&P and the VA asked an VES Doctor for a second opinion with no exam. Claim came back as Not Service Connected, was found less likely as not service related, and was caused by Excessive Coffee Drinking.

My question is should I ask for a reconsideration or file a NOD?

Thanks for your help.  

Edited by Sea_Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

File a NOD, and dispute the decision with evidence.  

First, it may not matter if coffee drinking in service caused the malady.  You are in service 24/7, and often troops do not have control over their food intake...this is dictated by their superiors.  

Focus on "what is important".  The rest is noise.  

You need, as usual 3 things for SC:

1.  current diagnosis.  I assume you have this, you should check it out and read your SMR's.  

2.  In service event.  If that doc said it was caused by you drinking coffee in the service, well, there is your in service event.  

3.  Nexus, or link between in service event and current diagnosis.  

Rememeber, and tatoo this on your arm if necessary:

Quote

VA often "makes stuff up" especially when it comes to denials.  They have to rate "on the criteria".  Does the "criteria" say you dont get benefits if you drink coffee??  I doubt it.  It probably also does not say you dont get benefits if you have blue hair.  Whether you drink coffee is irrelevant, unless VA is admitting this as a nexus.  

The VA denied me because they said my "hearing loss was too long since military service".  I looked up the criteria.  Nope, there was nothing that said, "Time since military service" was a factor.  It isnt in the criteria, and I called em out on that.  If "number of cups of coffee consumed per day" is one of the criteria, then they can use that.  It isnt.  Its a bogus, made up denial, as per usual.  

When you file a nod focus on "how you met the criteria"...with evidence from doc exams, not your opinions.  Read the criteria.  Look it up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 hour ago, broncovet said:

File a NOD, and dispute the decision with evidence.  

First, it may not matter if coffee drinking in service caused the malady.  You are in service 24/7, and often troops do not have control over their food intake...this is dictated by their superiors.  

Focus on "what is important".  The rest is noise.  

You need, as usual 3 things for SC:

1.  current diagnosis.  I assume you have this, you should check it out and read your SMR's.  

2.  In service event.  If that doc said it was caused by you drinking coffee in the service, well, there is your in service event.  

3.  Nexus, or link between in service event and current diagnosis.  

Rememeber, and tatoo this on your arm if necessary:

The VA denied me because they said my "hearing loss was too long since military service".  I looked up the criteria.  Nope, there was nothing that said, "Time since military service" was a factor.  It isnt in the criteria, and I called em out on that.  If "number of cups of coffee consumed per day" is one of the criteria, then they can use that.  It isnt.  Its a bogus, made up denial, as per usual.  

When you file a nod focus on "how you met the criteria"...with evidence from doc exams, not your opinions.  Read the criteria.  Look it up.  

Broncovet,

 Thanks for the advice. I knew that filing a claim could turn into a long process and I will file the NOD with the evidence I have and hope that they see it my way.

Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

"Help them" see it your way, by focusing on how your evidence satisfies the criteria.  

If you read BVA decisions, time and time again they say, 

The criteria for _____ condition has been (or has not been) met.  If you meet the criteria, you get the benefits.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use