Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 1
Sign in to follow this  
WomanMarine

How to Appeal a RAMP decision

Question

I opted into RAMP the first of May, however my VSO did not sign the paperwork and it was not submitted till 5/17.

I had two issues with my claim.

First they did not rate my knee, which was my original injury that has now caused issues with my back and left knee.  Secondly, in 1980 the VA removed my 0% rating that the VA had given me in 1976 and totally removed my 'service-connected' injury. This is a CUE as they should have upgraded my disability, rather than totally remove it.

Yesterday I learned that the VA has approved the rating on my knee. This would take my 80% P&T to 100% P&T. I do see that there are benefits that come with 100% P&T, but the record should be corrected to reflect the 'early effective date'.

I do understand that the VA, generally, will only rate on issue @ a time ... 

So my question is ... since I had a 'high level review' ... How do I challenge RAMP?

I apologize that I do not have the 'letter' to determine their exact 'verbiage' ... but whatever it is, it will be wrong in this case.

Pending.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

How in the World did you get from May 17 opt-in to a decision in just two months?   This sounds like a RAMP record to me.  I am a VSO in Texas........to answer your question file now for Appeal Board Lane,  As I understand they will start looking at those Appeals in October 2018 as a test-run leading up to releasing the full model in February 2019.  That is the way to go and the sooner you file I would assume the better and earlier your will get in front of a Judge. I would recommend asking for a Hearing....might take longer but you then get to make your case in front of a Video Judge or maybe even a live Judge.....and a lot of times that is the difference-maker you need and want.   Good luck and keep us posted with your case.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1
18 minutes ago, Wayne TX said:

How in the World did you get from May 17 opt-in to a decision in just two months?   This sounds like a RAMP record to me.  I am a VSO in Texas........to answer your question file now for Appeal Board Lane,  As I understand they will start looking at those Appeals in October 2018 as a test-run leading up to releasing the full model in February 2019.  That is the way to go and the sooner you file I would assume the better and earlier your will get in front of a Judge. I would recommend asking for a Hearing....might take longer but you then get to make your case in front of a Video Judge or maybe even a live Judge.....and a lot of times that is the difference-maker you need and want.   Good luck and keep us posted with your case.

Well I am not sure they actually did much ... 

From what I can get from my VSO is that they approved my 30% on my R knee, which was the reason I was discharged. I had issue with it right out of service and lost my first job. VA put me in full leg cast for six months. I then applied for Voc Rehab, VA denied, but gave me 0% and gave me a 'service-connected' health benefit card. Four years later, knee goes out again tearing ligaments ... I applied for disability. Denied and my 0% removed. They stated 'normal progression' ... That is CUE and why I believe I should have an earlier effective date and will have to appeal ... 

Does it ever end ...? 

Pending.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

Hmm.

Server seems to be down but I did get this ... 

So I believe they have 'closed' the file'. 

Appeal Complete 7172018.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

Good thread. Keep us updated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

I generally dont speculate "what VA means" with ebenefits.  This is like trying to figure out what the weather will be based on a sow's ear, because ebenefits is unreliable.  

This said, it sounds like you got 100 percent in some sort of higher level review, but speculating on an effective date is also pointless without a written VARO decision.  So, in that, Congratulations.  Well, maybe if ebenefits is correct.  Try this one thing.  Go to ebenefits and try to print out an AB8 letter.  If you can do so for 100 percent, its likely that has happened because as unreliable as ebenefits is, the VA does not want people with letters saying they are 100 percent printed off ebenefits if they are not actually rated that.    

Did I mention you need to wait on the envelope on not count on ebenefits?  

You would appeal a ramp decision the way you always did, with few changes:  You file a NOD to a VA originated decision within a year, and you file a NOA to a BVA decision within 60 days.  Yes, you can dispute the effective date with either a VARO, DRO (or higher level review), or BVA decision, and, you should do so if you think they got it wrong.  

Ebenefits, for example, shows the effective date "of the most recent pay raise" (not the real effective date), which is usually Dec.1 of the previous year.  

I know there is a great temptation to speculate on what ebenefits says, but my long experience strongly says to wait for the envelope.  Some Vets advocates even recommend "not" checking ebenefits for this exact reason.  

To find out more about appealing a ramp decision, read this, as you did not mention which "level of review" you selected with ramp.

https://cck-law.com/news/everything-you-need-to-know-about-RAMP/

Edited by broncovet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
    • I was denied SC for IBS and GERD IN 2011. In 2019 I was awarded SC for GERD. This CUE  is for 2011, both GERD and IBS. There are some odd aspects regarding the 2011 decision, the way it was written and the C&P report and the way it was written. I've tried to present this as clearly as I can. Note: the decision contradicts itself. the decision also contradicts the C&P Report. Honestly, I think the rater just got confused because the C&P was so poorly written. *THIS CUE HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED*Please let me know what you think. Appreciate all comments and suggestions. Thanks.

       

      VA RATING DECISION MARCH 23 2011 GERD IBS.pdf C P REPORT 7312010 GERD IBS.pdf GERD IBS CUE 2011(1).pdf

      C P ADDENDUM REQUEST RE DIAGNOSIS 7232010.pdf
      • 56 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines