Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0

Read first if you think you have a CUE potential


  • HadIt.com Elder

Please  scan and attach the decision you think holds a valid CUE-cover your C file #, name, address prior to scanning it.

And add  that to your CUE question post. It is easy to attach or paste from a scan here.

We really cannot opine on a possible CUE if we  cant see the decision.



Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Posts

I felt that one of the docs was a SMR that stated arthritis in hand-( the 4th page you scanned with yellow highlighter on that statement) but if that was an SMR page, ( I think it is ) I am sure

Yes it was my SMR and the third and fourth page is the decision letter. Yes they stated that they reviewed my records numerous times and missed the arthritis in hand part. If I remember right there’s


Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I’ve got another one in the works. My lawyer submitted it after he noticed it; 

Status of Your Claim

  • Submitted: 06/21/2018 (Compensation)
  • Estimated Completion: 09/19/2018 - 11/25/2018
  • Representative for VA Claims: CHUCK R PARDUE
  • Current Status: Gathering of Evidence
  • I can take a picture or scan the decision letter back in 98 in which I claimed pain in my right hand. The VA In their infinite wisdom looked at my little finger that got crushed and never examined my pain in hand claim. After reviewing my smr it states that I complained about it and they diagnosed my hand with arthritis x 5 months. Here is the evidence on my CUE; 






Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I couldn't make the scans horizontal- cant read unless I print them off and I dont print off stuff here due to the HIPPA laws but based on what you stated here-if the hand disability was at a ratable level then- they seem to have definitely made a CUE in that decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • Moderator

Well, I pretty much "dont" dispute Berta's opinion, for 3 Great reasons: SHE IS RIGHT.  

However, Im a big fan of "not making something more difficult than necessary."  

The Cue "standard of review" is the most difficult to meet, reminding you the benefit of the doubt goes out the window.  

Reopening, due to 38 cfr 3.156 b or 3.156 c, would "preserve" the benefit of the doubt, and lower the "bar" you must jump over to win.  

Im not saying . "it isnt CUE", Im saying if you reopen due to new evidence, then the cue standard of review may not be necessary and you may be making things more difficult for yourself.  

Only a small portion of "errors" rise to the Cue standard of review.    That is, not all "errors" are CUE errors.  You have to show the error was not only undebatable and not a judgement call, but you also have to show it was outcome determinative and based on the evidence at hand.  

Lets use an example, and I dont know if this applies or not.  

In this example, lets say someone in VA messed up, and, for whatever reason "Evidence A" was not in your file.  The decision maker renders a decision not considering "evidence a".  Well, this is unlikely CUE because the decision maker rendered a decision based on what evidence he had available at that time.  The procuedure here is not to file a CUE, because that unfairly does not give the Veteran the benefit of equipose, and instead means his evidence has to be undebatable.  In this example, you could win benefits by reopeing due to new and material evidence, but you could get a cue claim denied.  One reason for this is because the VA's failure to due the Duty to assist is not cue, but would often be considered "harmless error".  It would be your responsibility to show that who ever did not consider this evidence was an "outcome determinative" error.  

Another example in this same tune is if the VA decision mis spells a word.  They leave off an "i".  Well, a spelling error would unlikely be outcome determinative, so it would instead be called "harmless error", and not cue.  There are many "harmless errors" VA can make and sometimes its hard to know, for sure, if that error would up being "outcome determinative".  

My suggestion is to try reopening the claim based on new evidence.  If this fails, then you can still file a cue motion because there is no time limit on cue motions.  

The key here is understanding that unadjuticated claim is pending.  A claim remains pending until finally adjuticated.  There is no time limit.  You see, when you reopen a "pending" claim, you get the effective date you opened the claim originally, see 38 cfr 3.156 b.  Its about the "pending claim" doctrine, which is somewhat complex.  Suffice it to say a claim remains pending until "finally adjuticated".  

Its possible, or even likely, that a motion for Cue is denied because the claim is pending, as cue errors apply only to finally adjuticated claims.  

Example:  You apply for benfits, VA "forgets about" your claim for 5 years.  You get mad and file a Cue.  VA denies your Cue claim because they simply say, "Oh, we are working on your claim.  We are really sorry (gee isnt that backlog awful?) but we will get to your claim as soon as we can, but must deny your cue, as it isnt a finally adjutciated issue.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
  • Moderator

 I Agree with broncovet here,

I've always went on the CUE philosophy that if it will change the outcome DECISION in the Veterans favor  File CUE. if it don't...Don't file CUE.

And broncovet gives some good examples. 

Edited by Buck52
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Post in New BVA Grants
      While the BVA has some discretion here, often they "chop up claims".  For example, BVA will order SERVICE CONNECTION, and leave it up to the VARO the disability percent and effective date.  

      I hate that its that way.  The board should "render a decision", to include service connection, disability percentage AND effective date, so we dont have to appeal "each" of those issues over then next 15 years on a hamster wheel.  
    • Finally heard back that I received my 100% Overall rating and a 100% PTSD rating Following my long appeal process!

      My question is this, given the fact that my appeal was on the advanced docket and is an “Expedited” appeal, what happens now and how long(ish) is the process from here on out with retro and so forth? I’ve read a million things but nothing with an expedited appeal status.

      Anyone deal with this situation before? My jump is from 50 to 100 over the course of 2 years if that helps some. I only am asking because as happy as I am, I would be much happier to pay some of these bills off!
      • 13 replies
    • I told reviewer that I had a bad C&P, and that all I wanted was a fair shake, and she even said, that was what she was all ready viewed for herself. The first C&P don't even  reflect my Treatment in the VA PTSD clinic. In my new C&P I was only asked about symptoms, seeing shit, rituals, nightmares, paying bills and about childhood, but didn't ask about details of it. Just about twenty question, and  nothing about stressor,
    • This is the latest Compensation & Pension (C&P) Clinicians Guide dated 20180719. The only other one I've seen is dated 2002, including the one on this website and the VA website. I got this from my claims agent, who got it from the VA.

      VA Compensation & Pension (C&P) Clinicians Guide 2 Final Corrected 20180719.pdf
      • 12 replies
    • I don’t say thank you enough to all of you...
      You, yes you, are the reason HadIt.com has remained a resource-rich resource. Thousands come each month to read, ask questions, or to feel a sense of community.

      Last month June 2020, we over 50k visitors they viewed over 160k pages. Veterans and their advocates, spouses, children, and friends of veterans come looking for answers. Because we have posts dating back 15 years and articles on the home page, they usually can find an answer or at least get pointed in the right direction.

      You all made that possible. Thank you.
        • Like
      • 8 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines