Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Berta

Read first if you think you have a CUE potential

Question

Please  scan and attach the decision you think holds a valid CUE-cover your C file #, name, address prior to scanning it.

And add  that to your CUE question post. It is easy to attach or paste from a scan here.

We really cannot opine on a possible CUE if we  cant see the decision.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I’ve got another one in the works. My lawyer submitted it after he noticed it; 

Status of Your Claim

  • Submitted: 06/21/2018 (Compensation)
  • Estimated Completion: 09/19/2018 - 11/25/2018
  • Disabilities Claimed: CLAIM FOR CLEAR AND UNMISTAKABLE ERROR FOR FAILURE TO GRANT SERVICE CONNECTION FOR RIGHT HAND ARTHRITIS ON AN AUGUST 1998 RATING DECISION (Reopen)
  • Representative for VA Claims: CHUCK R PARDUE
  • Current Status: Gathering of Evidence
  • I can take a picture or scan the decision letter back in 98 in which I claimed pain in my right hand. The VA In their infinite wisdom looked at my little finger that got crushed and never examined my pain in hand claim. After reviewing my smr it states that I complained about it and they diagnosed my hand with arthritis x 5 months. Here is the evidence on my CUE; 

C74A9A44-3EC3-4491-951E-2AE6FF701ACF.jpeg

7A583FBD-70BC-4156-93C8-EA0B4B7E5174.jpeg

C96F0FE2-DEBA-4504-AA10-7752930AA827.jpeg

1D0BAEC5-9245-4861-89A3-3B924BFBE949.jpeg

379BDEE7-86BD-4A57-A781-7E91A2A4034F.jpeg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I couldn't make the scans horizontal- cant read unless I print them off and I dont print off stuff here due to the HIPPA laws but based on what you stated here-if the hand disability was at a ratable level then- they seem to have definitely made a CUE in that decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Well, I pretty much "dont" dispute Berta's opinion, for 3 Great reasons: SHE IS RIGHT.  

However, Im a big fan of "not making something more difficult than necessary."  

The Cue "standard of review" is the most difficult to meet, reminding you the benefit of the doubt goes out the window.  

Reopening, due to 38 cfr 3.156 b or 3.156 c, would "preserve" the benefit of the doubt, and lower the "bar" you must jump over to win.  

Im not saying . "it isnt CUE", Im saying if you reopen due to new evidence, then the cue standard of review may not be necessary and you may be making things more difficult for yourself.  

Only a small portion of "errors" rise to the Cue standard of review.    That is, not all "errors" are CUE errors.  You have to show the error was not only undebatable and not a judgement call, but you also have to show it was outcome determinative and based on the evidence at hand.  

Lets use an example, and I dont know if this applies or not.  

In this example, lets say someone in VA messed up, and, for whatever reason "Evidence A" was not in your file.  The decision maker renders a decision not considering "evidence a".  Well, this is unlikely CUE because the decision maker rendered a decision based on what evidence he had available at that time.  The procuedure here is not to file a CUE, because that unfairly does not give the Veteran the benefit of equipose, and instead means his evidence has to be undebatable.  In this example, you could win benefits by reopeing due to new and material evidence, but you could get a cue claim denied.  One reason for this is because the VA's failure to due the Duty to assist is not cue, but would often be considered "harmless error".  It would be your responsibility to show that who ever did not consider this evidence was an "outcome determinative" error.  

Another example in this same tune is if the VA decision mis spells a word.  They leave off an "i".  Well, a spelling error would unlikely be outcome determinative, so it would instead be called "harmless error", and not cue.  There are many "harmless errors" VA can make and sometimes its hard to know, for sure, if that error would up being "outcome determinative".  

My suggestion is to try reopening the claim based on new evidence.  If this fails, then you can still file a cue motion because there is no time limit on cue motions.  

The key here is understanding that unadjuticated claim is pending.  A claim remains pending until finally adjuticated.  There is no time limit.  You see, when you reopen a "pending" claim, you get the effective date you opened the claim originally, see 38 cfr 3.156 b.  Its about the "pending claim" doctrine, which is somewhat complex.  Suffice it to say a claim remains pending until "finally adjuticated".  

Its possible, or even likely, that a motion for Cue is denied because the claim is pending, as cue errors apply only to finally adjuticated claims.  

Example:  You apply for benfits, VA "forgets about" your claim for 5 years.  You get mad and file a Cue.  VA denies your Cue claim because they simply say, "Oh, we are working on your claim.  We are really sorry (gee isnt that backlog awful?) but we will get to your claim as soon as we can, but must deny your cue, as it isnt a finally adjutciated issue.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

 I Agree with broncovet here,

I've always went on the CUE philosophy that if it will change the outcome DECISION in the Veterans favor  File CUE. if it don't...Don't file CUE.

And broncovet gives some good examples. 

Edited by Buck52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I just wanted to point out  for veterans that use pencil for lay statements or from Dr's medical notes   make sure you use ink or type write all your correspondence from now on  on your claims application and any paper you write on and submit to the VA

THIS IS COPIED OVER AND THE MACHINE THEY USE WILL NOT COPY PENCIL LEAD..IT NEEDS TO BE DARK INK OR DARK TYPING.

or it will not transfer over to where you can read it...all this stuff is placed in your C-FILE and when it don't copy  its useless.   the paper will be there but blurry as to where you can't read it  or just a blank sheet of paper that did not copy over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines