Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Confused (sort of) about DAV Unofficial Notification

Rate this question


OldJoe

Question

Got an unofficial notification from the DAV about my DRO appeal stating that they were giving me an earlier date for my tinnitus (that baffled me) and that they were granting me 40% for my back (degenerative arthritis).  My appeal was for secondary service connection for my knees, there was nothing about my knees in the "unofficial notification".

So I went to the closest regional off and was finally seen.  They looked up the "official" notification (SOC) from the VA and it stated nothing about my back but stated that they had denied me my secondary claim on my knees stating that the Dr couldn't find anything to connect my claim to either my back or the service (um, always thought knees went when back went, so secondary was almost a given, then again he did specialize in cardiology).

In someways I am not that surprised, but I am wondering about the "unofficial" notice both the "unofficial" and "official" where dated the same (July 5th) I cannot believe in a matter of a few moments the VA totally changed their decision.  So that has got me flummoxed.

What makes this unique is that if the 40% for my back was based on the one medical entry that they didn't use for my initial claim back in 95/96.  I was never able to get anybody to write me a nexus letter for this so I could "officially" reopen the case.  If the "unofficial" letter holds true and I am just waiting on other paperwork to be finalized then they have all but argued CUE and handed me a win without even trying (I know the VA will never give up that easily).  The entry stated scoliosis and that it was a recurring issue, their determination was based on an earlier entry and stated in black and white they could not find any other entries.  Can you say "gotchya"?

Getting a letter now for my knees should be easier since I have some indication that the VA does ("did") give some indication that they felt that my evidence did indicate connection to the service concerning my back.

Can anyone possibly clue me into what might be going on?  Did the DAV totally get it wrong?  Or, is this just part of the whole overall process and I am only seeing part of it?

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

I can't speak to your question if the DAV got it wrong...... I can tell you this... DAV was at one time my assigned representative and even when I fired them for incompetence they wouldn't go away.  Every time the  VA wrote me a letter they sent a copy to the DAV regardless of the countless times I told the VA they were not my representative.  Finally, I received a letter from the Waco Regional Office DAV, the letter stated that my claim had been denied.. but wait... that claim was denied 3 years ago... well you all know were they had their heads.. So I got into my Truck and drove the  60 miles to Waco, signed into the VA and told them in no uncertain terms they had better stop sending my stuff to the DAV. When that was done I went down the hall to the DAV office, asked to see the big honcho,,  and showing him the letter they sent , said this letter speaks to why your people don't have the knowledge or training to be my representative... He tried to tell me I was wrong and started to go into detail about their training... I just laughed and said you can't BS and BSer, I was a chapter service officer years ago.. I know all about your DAV Training...it was a joke then and its still a joke.. with that I got up and left...  Bottom line.. I would not trust the DAV to identified a hangnail, much less submit a claim on my behalf. I learned long ago want something done right you have to do it yourself....   If there was anyway that I could have my name removed from the DAV membership rolls I would do just that... When I joined the DAV well over 30 years ago they were a great organization... now they have a lot of new veterans and try to cater to their needs and have completely forgotten the old timers... and along the way they not only ruined the DAV, but changed the Logo and a lot of other things.....

                                                                                I am not a lawyer so take my opinions with a grain of salt...

If I had listened to the nay sayers, I would never have acheived any ratings after I was awarded TDIU in 1999. Now I have not one but two 100% ratings, a TDIU  and 4 SMC awards !  I say JUST GO For It

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” -Albert Einstein.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I have gotten double unofficial notification from the DAV before, with a phone call. I can't speak to the DAV as a whole, but the local office here has always been right, in 17 years. They sent me a letter, there was a change at the RO level to my claim as it went from a decision made to a decision changed within a week, DAV called me to explain, then sent me a new letter as well. 

The Earth is degenerating these days. Bribery and corruption abound.Children no longer mind their parents, every man wants to write a book,and it is evident that the end of the world is fast approaching. --17 different possible sources, all lacking verifiable attribution.

B.S. Doane College, Mgt Info Systems/Systems Analysis 2008

M.S.Ed. Purdue University, Instructional Development and Technology, Feb. 2021

M.S. Purdue University Information Technology/InfoSec, Dec 2022

100% P/T

MDD

Spine

Radiculopathy

Sleep Apnea

Some other stuff

-------------------------------------------
B.S. Info Systems Mgt/Systems Analysis-Doane College 2008
M.S. Instructional Technology and Design- Purdue University 2021

 

(I AM NOT A RATER- I work the claims BEFORE they are rated, annotating medical evidence in your records, VA and Legal documents,  and DA/DD forms- basically a paralegal/vso/etc except that I also evaluate your records based on Caluza and try to justify and schedule the exams that you go to based on whether or not your records have enough in them to warrant those)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks, for the input guys.

It just seems really bizarre that both were sent out the same day (supposedly) they both have the same dates at the top July 5th.

Got a bad feeling that Review Officer was going to decide one way but "advised" not to.

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I had DAV for a couple of years. The rep I had was very good and would send me unofficial notification on decisions. When she retired, I was transferred to another DAV rep who was not as helpful. It's about the quality of people.

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

An update, finally got clarification from the DAV on what is going on.

Evidently the VA finally did acknowledge that my back is related to the military service (after presenting the documentation from the service records it is so obvious a blind squirrel would stand up and take note).

So the VA is granting me 40% for spine.  Just have to wait for them to finish their "audit" which could take upwards of 6 months...  DAV says the best way to know that they have finished everything is to keep an eye on my checking account (good grief).

That said, and how I explicitly put everything I have absolutely no clue how far they will go back.   It is a C.U.E. and there ain't no way they can deny it.  It is all in black and white.  That said this is the VA, so that statement and a $1.50 might get me a coffee somewhere cheap.  So, will probably have to fight for the 20% all the way back to 95/96 and for the Voc Rehab that I had applied for back then.

Now just need to get them to do secondaries for my legs and knees.  Was Security Police (AF equivalent of infantry) spent many hours wearing out boots, so that alone would give me a bit of plausibility alone for a direct connection (to think I thought it was fun to run in combat boots, must have been daft in the head back then) and all I am doing is going for secondary not a direct.

Between my back, knees (both),  legs (both), tinnitus, and one other item should finish off at 100% scheduler.

Edited by OldJoe
Left out something

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well, finally some good news. 
 

The VA Did award me 40% for my back.  Now just got to get them to connect my knees (argh!!!, This is a non adversarial process....  Find my happy place, find my happy place...)

40% Back

10% Tenitis

10% Left Knee

10% Anxiety

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use