Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0



I called Peggy a few days ago to check on my NOD and during our conversation I brought to her attention that my 2016 C&P increased my MS bladder to 60% and my 2017 C&P reduced it to 40%.  She asked if I received a letter re: reducing to which I said I never received a letter.  She looked further and said my disease is static to which I replied "yes I know."  I have been 100% P&T for 15 years.  She said "CUE---my static status was overlooked"  I agree, that is why I filed the NOD to dispute the reduction.

Peggy encouraged me to opt into RAMP and to compose a letter which addresses the CUE.  I have read about (from Berta and Alex, and others) how calling a CUE is a major move, not to be taken lightly at all. 

I guess I am seeking opinions, advice, and thoughts on how to proceed.

Thank you to one and all.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

Hollie- there is a wealth of CUE info in our CUE forum here.

What is the date of the decision that held this:

"and my 2017 C&P reduced it to 40%"

Can you scan and attach that decision? ( cover C file #, name, etc.)

I am surprised that anyone at the 800# really could determine a CUE.





Edited by Berta

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

If the VA did not go through the procedures, (to reduce you) then the reduction should be void ab initio.  They have to give you 60 days notice.  

However, IM not sure that applies if it does not reduce your actual compensation, such as, if you were at 140 percent, and they reduced you 20 percent.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

With VA proposed Reductions, Vets have "30 Days" from the Date of the Reduction Letter, not it's mailing to the Vet's last known address, to file the Appeal/NOD.

The "60 Days" from date of Reduction Letter, applies only to submission of New & Material supportive Evidence, not the Filing of the Reduction Appeal/NOD. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

Void Ab initio means:

(from wikipedia) 

Void ab initio. A contract is null from the beginning if it seriously offends law or public policy.  

This would mean if you were reduced without proper notice, then this reduction should be void from the beginning as if it never happened, and you should get back pay.  

It would mean that VA failed to follow the proper "reduction" procedure, where you have "notice" of the proposed reduction, including an opportunity for a hearing.  This would be a violation of due process, 38 CFR 3.103.  

CCK law explains the reduction process VA must follow:  


Interestingly, Gastone and I were both correct:  You have 60 days to submit new evidence (after the proposed reduction) and 30 days to request  a hearing.  It sounds like you did NOT get a proposed reduction, therefore, VA couldnt possibly have given you this mandantory due process, and your reduction should be void ab initio.  

You may consider contacting a lawyer on this, there is little doubt you deserve back pay.  However, if there is no back pay, as I explained, that is, the reduction occurred but it did not reduce your compensation, I dont know what happens.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

I will add this (reduction) should be void ab initio even if you really deserved to be reduced because VA failed to do the proper procedure to reduce you. 

Beleive me, it works the other way also.  If you dont do everything you are supposed to do when you apply for benefits, you wont get benefits.  As an example, VA requires you sign a "release form" releasing your medical records.  The VA can not compel you to sign this form.  However, you wont get any benefits if you do not sign it.  Filling out and signing VA forms is not mandantory, but, you will be denied benefits if you dont do it. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines