Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Effective date

Rate this question


mcsanty

Question

Hello 

I need some help,  I submitted a notice of this agreement back in May 2015 , for Claim that was denied back In  November  2015 for anxiety.

 On April 26, 2018 It shows that my NOD was complete ,VA granted me  100% for Anxiety/ Depression.

 

 Now back in April 14, 1997 . I submitted  an information  claim , requesting  for increase for my back and hips injuries  that the VA awarded me 10% back in those days.

 Attached to that claim there was a statement , from my  Private doctor  explained my condition and that I was suffering from anxiety and depression, And that I was not able to work and that he describe  me medication.

Question

 Now that I am awarded 100% for Anxiety and depression ,Can I dispute the effective  date  , and if yes what do I have to do what form do I have to submit.

 Thank you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Yes, you can dispute the effective date.  I can not tell you whether or not it will be successful.  

The effective date is the later of "facts found" (usually the date the doc said you became disabled) or the date you applied.  There are exceptions to this.  

Here is (perhaps) a problem with what you posted.  

When you go to the doc, its assumed you go there for TREATMENT, not necessarily to apply for benefits.  

To "apply for benefits" you have to have 3 things, (back then):

1.  The application needs to be "in writing".  

2.  You have to "show intent" to apply for one or more benefits. 

3.  You have to "specify the benefit sought".  

With all this said, your conversation with your doctor "may" have been construed as an application for benefit increase.  

Its rather complex Veterans law.  

Due to the amount of retro involved, it may be in your best interest to hire an attorney to seek your earlier date.  

While the VA does not "advertise" this, make no mistake:  A GS7 rating specialist "probably isnt" going to cut you a check for about a half million dollars in retro.  

This usually happens by a judge, sometimes at the BVA, sometimes at the CAVC level.  

My suggestion is you send the applicable decisions and information to an attorney experienced in Vetereans law, probably a NOVA attorney.  Typically they will charge nothing up front, but 20 percent of your retro.  https://www.vetadvocates.org/cpages/sustaining-members-directory

Some well known Veteran's attorney's are Hill and Pontoon, CCK law, Ken Carpenter of Topeka Kansas, Chris Attig at Attig Steele.  Im pretty sure any of these will "review" your case and decide if they think you have a winnable case.  They will want to see your documents, most dont want to just "interpret" YOUR interpretations of the decision, but they would rather read the decision themself and then decide.  It should cost you zero for an evaluation, and then you could decide whether:

1.  To hire that attorney.

2.  To hire a different attorney.

3.  To have a VSO represetnt you.

4.  To represent yourself.  

      There are also "non attorney" practioners, such as Alex Graham who is very very familiar with VA law, yet does not have a law degree.  I would avoid any representation where they require "up front" money.    This said, its possible you will need an IMO/IME to win your case, and that practioner will likely want to get paid whether or not you win your claim.  I have no idea, for sure, if you need an IMO/IME, but you may need to document that you were unemployable now and back then.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Attached to that claim there was a statement , from my  Private doctor  explained my condition and that I was suffering from anxiety and depression, And that I was not able to work and that he describe  me medication."

 

Question

 Now that I am awarded 100% for Anxiety and depression ,Can I dispute the effective  date  , and if yes what do I have to do what form do I have to submit."

Did you formally claim the anxiety and depression prior to the EED you have now?

Did the VA adjudicate the anxiety and depression in any past decision, prior to their award?

For some reason ,we have seen here lately, a few vets who think their EED should be better but never formally filed a past claim for the same thing....??????

38 CFR 3.156 and CUE are ways to get a better EED.

BUT that is only if the VA had rendered a past decision on a actual formal claim for the same disability.

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use