Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
usmcman001

Denied connections and pyramiding...

Question

I just received a letter from my VSO and it shows that I was only rated for 3 out of 15 conditions I applied for. This is ridiculous IMO. They also combined knees, shin splints and ankle condition into one? Is this common practice? They were submitted separately. My C&P exam said I should be connected for most of these especially my back, ankles and heel spurs. Xrays show the conditions and they are called out in the notes from the Dr. 

Also, I noticed that the Dr. only put 1 of 4 scars are painful which is false. Three are in the same area and the whole area is tender to push or touch on. What should I do here? 

Hypertension is stage one in the civilian sector but just below in terms of the VA as far as what my BP ratings average were during the exam. 

I have headaches/migraines and listed these under GW unexplained but was denied. I have not been seen for these by the doctor but was asked in the exam about it and whether I had migraines or headaches frequently. I said yes and explained the conditions. 

Need help! 

Direct from my C&P notes:

SPURS: c. If any test results are other than normal, indicate relationship of abnormal findings to diagnosed conditions: The xrays of the ankles done by me at the time of this exam show mild to moderate posterior calcaneal spurring and the right shows mild posterior calcaneal spurring. These both indicate inflammation in the inferior attachments of the achilles tendons of the ankles. Therefore, early degenerative changes

BACK: Findings: There is trace retrolisthesis of L5 on S1, in combination with mild disc space narrowing and mild to moderate facet arthropathy at this level. There is also moderate disc space narrowing at T11/12 with superimposed osteophytosis. Minimal endplate degenerative changes are noted at L1/2. Vertebral body heights, disc space heights, and vertebral body alignment are otherwise maintained. Visualized portions of the abdomen appear grossly unremarkable. 
Impression:
Degenerative disc disease at L5/S1, T11/12, and L1/2. 

 

 

DAV letter.jpg

Edited by usmcman001

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

3/15 is about 20 percent, and about 85 percent of first time claims are denied, so you did well.  

Focus on the other 12 claims where you have:

1.  current diagnosis

2.  In service event or aggravation

3  Nexus, or doctors opinion that 1 and 2 are related.  

     You need to file a nod on the disputed conditions, obtain or show documentation of the above, and fight for this in appeals.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks, bronco vet. Any idea on why they would like knee condition, shin splints and ankle conditions into one rating? Is this to dodge rating each to keep total percentage down?

In my C&P exam notes it says only one of my four scars is painful. This is false and I said all three on the thigh are sore and hurt to be pushed on or touched. What do I do about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

There are 3 ways to "fix" this problem, other than "doing nothing".  

1.  Get your erroneous medical records corrected.  Read this: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/1.579

2.  Get another VA doc to offer a more favorable opinion.  

3.  Get an IMO/IME refuting that unfavorable opinion.  This is probably best, but its also the most expensive.  

 

     As far as why they are lumped into one rating, the short answer is, "I dont know", but this is an appealable issue if you felt your rating should be higher seperately.  This means you file a nod on that issue, as well as other denials.  

    You can also dispute the disability percentages on the claims that were awarded, if you feel the rating should be higher.  Look up the criteria for each condition and see if you think the rating is correct.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
    • I was denied SC for IBS and GERD IN 2011. In 2019 I was awarded SC for GERD. This CUE  is for 2011, both GERD and IBS. There are some odd aspects regarding the 2011 decision, the way it was written and the C&P report and the way it was written. I've tried to present this as clearly as I can. Note: the decision contradicts itself. the decision also contradicts the C&P Report. Honestly, I think the rater just got confused because the C&P was so poorly written. *THIS CUE HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED*Please let me know what you think. Appreciate all comments and suggestions. Thanks.

       

      VA RATING DECISION MARCH 23 2011 GERD IBS.pdf C P REPORT 7312010 GERD IBS.pdf GERD IBS CUE 2011(1).pdf

      C P ADDENDUM REQUEST RE DIAGNOSIS 7232010.pdf
        • Like
      • 56 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines