Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Injuried eye

Rate this question


brid3

Question

2 years ago the VA in Lakeland, FL removed cataracts from both of my eyes.  Individual eyes work great, bu they did not seem to work together.  The eye clinic scheduled an eye exam for me last year at a private eye doctor.  When I told him of my problem he looked and found that during the cataract surgery the tech that performed the procedure had nick an eye muscle.  Therefore the eyes will not work together.  It can be corrected by glasses.  Do I have any recourse on the VA.  They are the ones screwed up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Yes, that can be pursed but I have no idea how they would rate-since glasses have corrected the problem, then again if you did not need glasses before the surgery, at all -the comp would be higher.

I had cataract surgery (I am a civilian) - I still need glasses for books and my PC but I never need them to drive anymore-what type of vision did the glasses correct? ( reading vision?)

Cataracts usually affect distance vision. Is that what caused the need for glasses?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

 brid3

This might help you.

4.79   Schedule of ratings—eye.

Diseases of the Eye

   Rating

General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye:

Evaluate on the basis of either visual impairment due to the particular condition or on incapacitating episodes, whichever results in a higher evaluation

With documented incapacitating episodes requiring 7 or more treatment visits for an eye condition during the past 12 months60

With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 5 but less than 7 treatment visits for an eye condition during the past 12 months40

With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 3 but less than 5 treatment visits for an eye condition during the past 12 months20

With documented incapacitating episodes requiring at least 1 but less than 3 treatment visits for an eye condition during the past 12 months10

Note (1): For the purposes of evaluation under 38 CFR 4.79, an incapacitating episode is an eye condition severe enough to require a clinic visit to a provider specifically for treatment purposes

Note (2): Examples of treatment may include but are not limited to: Systemic immunosuppressants or biologic agents; intravitreal or periocular injections; laser treatments; or other surgical interventions

Note (3): For the purposes of evaluating visual impairment due to the particular condition, refer to 38 CFR 4.75-4.78 and to §4.79, diagnostic codes 6061-6091

6000   Choroidopathy, including uveitis, iritis, cyclitis, or choroiditis.

6001   Keratopathy.

6002   Scleritis.

6006   Retinopathy or maculopathy not otherwise specified

6007   Intraocular hemorrhage.

6008   Detachment of retina.

6009   Unhealed eye injury.

Note: This code includes orbital trauma, as well as penetrating or non-penetrating eye injury

6010   Tuberculosis of eye:

Active100

Inactive: Evaluate under §4.88c or §4.89 of this part, whichever is appropriate

6011   Retinal scars, atrophy, or irregularities:

Localized scars, atrophy, or irregularities of the retina, unilateral or bilateral, that are centrally located and that result in an irregular, duplicated, enlarged, or diminished image10

Alternatively, evaluate based on the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, if this would result in a higher evaluation

6012   Angle-closure glaucoma

Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. Minimum evaluation if continuous medication is required10

6013   Open-angle glaucoma

Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. Minimum evaluation if continuous medication is required10

6014   Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin):

Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin) that require therapy that is comparable to those used for systemic malignancies, i.e., systemic chemotherapy, X-ray therapy more extensive than to the area of the eye, or surgery more extensive than enucleation100

Note: Continue the 100 percent rating beyond the cessation of any surgical, X-ray, antineoplastic chemotherapy, or other therapeutic procedure. Six months after discontinuance of such treatment, the appropriate disability rating will be determined by mandatory VA examination. Any change in evaluation based upon that or any subsequent examination will be subject to the provisions of §3.105(e) of this chapter. If there has been no local recurrence or metastasis, evaluate based on residuals

Malignant neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin) that do not require therapy comparable to that for systemic malignancies:

Separately evaluate visual and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), and combine the evaluations

6015   Benign neoplasms of the eye, orbit, and adnexa (excluding skin):

Separately evaluate visual and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), and combine the evaluations

6016   Nystagmus, central10

6017   Trachomatous conjunctivitis:

Active: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, minimum rating30

Inactive: Evaluate based on residuals, such as visual impairment and disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800)

6018   Chronic conjunctivitis (nontrachomatous):

Active: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, minimum rating10

Inactive: Evaluate based on residuals, such as visual impairment and disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800)

6019   Ptosis, unilateral or bilateral:

Evaluate based on visual impairment or, in the absence of visual impairment, on disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).

6020   Ectropion:

Bilateral20

Unilateral10

6021   Entropion:

Bilateral20

Unilateral10

6022   Lagophthalmos:

Bilateral20

Unilateral10

6023   Loss of eyebrows, complete, unilateral or bilateral10

6024   Loss of eyelashes, complete, unilateral or bilateral10

6025   Disorders of the lacrimal apparatus (epiphora, dacryocystitis, etc.):

Bilateral20

Unilateral10

6026   Optic neuropathy

6027   Cataract:

Preoperative: Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye

Postoperative: If a replacement lens is present (pseudophakia), evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. If there is no replacement lens, evaluate based on aphakia (diagnostic code 6029)

6029   Aphakia or dislocation of crystalline lens:

Evaluate based on visual impairment, and elevate the resulting level of visual impairment one step.

Minimum (unilateral or bilateral)30

6030   Paralysis of accommodation (due to neuropathy of the Oculomotor Nerve (cranial nerve III)).20

6032   Loss of eyelids, partial or complete:

Separately evaluate both visual impairment due to eyelid loss and nonvisual impairment, e.g., disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), and combine the evaluations.

6034   Pterygium:

Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), conjunctivitis (diagnostic code 6018), etc., depending on the particular findings, and combine in accordance with §4.25

6035   Keratoconus

6036   Status post corneal transplant:

Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye. Minimum, if there is pain, photophobia, and glare sensitivity10

6037   Pinguecula:

Evaluate based on disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800).

6040   Diabetic retinopathy

6042   Retinal dystrophy (including retinitis pigmentosa, wet or dry macular degeneration, early-onset macular degeneration, rod and/or cone dystrophy)

6046   Post-chiasmal disorders

Impairment of Central Visual Acuity

6061   Anatomical loss of both eyes1100

6062   No more than light perception in both eyes1100

6063   Anatomical loss of one eye:1

In the other eye 5/200 (1.5/60)100

In the other eye 10/200 (3/60)90

In the other eye 15/200 (4.5/60)80

In the other eye 20/200 (6/60)70

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)60

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)60

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)50

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)40

6064   No more than light perception in one eye:1

In the other eye 5/200 (1.5/60)100

In the other eye 10/200 (3/60)90

In the other eye 15/200 (4.5/60)80

In the other eye 20/200 (6/60)70

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)60

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)50

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)40

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)30

6065   Vision in one eye 5/200 (1.5/60):

In the other eye 5/200 (1.5/60)1100

In the other eye 10/200 (3/60)90

In the other eye 15/200 (4.5/60)80

In the other eye 20/200 (6/60)70

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)60

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)50

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)40

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)30

6066   Visual acuity in one eye 10/200 (3/60) or better:

Vision in one eye 10/200 (3/60):

In the other eye 10/200 (3/60)90

In the other eye 15/200 (4.5/60)80

In the other eye 20/200 (6/60)70

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)60

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)50

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)40

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)30

Vision in one eye 15/200 (4.5/60):

In the other eye 15/200 (4.5/60)80

In the other eye 20/200 (6/60)70

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)60

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)40

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)30

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)20

Vision in one eye 20/200 (6/60):

In the other eye 20/200 (6/60)70

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)60

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)40

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)30

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)20

Vision in one eye 20/100 (6/30):

In the other eye 20/100 (6/30)50

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)30

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)20

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)10

Vision in one eye 20/70 (6/21):

In the other eye 20/70 (6/21)30

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)20

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)10

Vision in one eye 20/50 (6/15):

In the other eye 20/50 (6/15)10

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)10

Vision in one eye 20/40 (6/12):

In the other eye 20/40 (6/12)0

1Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350.

Ratings for Impairment of Visual Fields

   Rating

6080   Visual field defects:

Homonymous hemianopsia30

Loss of temporal half of visual field:

Bilateral30

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/70 (6/21)

Loss of nasal half of visual field:

Bilateral10

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/50 (6/15)

Loss of inferior half of visual field:

Bilateral30

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/70 (6/21)

Loss of superior half of visual field:

Bilateral10

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/50 (6/15)

Concentric contraction of visual field:

With remaining field of 5 degrees:1

Bilateral100

Unilateral30

Or evaluate each affected eye as 5/200 (1.5/60)

With remaining field of 6 to 15 degrees:

Bilateral70

Unilateral20

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/200 (6/60)

With remaining field of 16 to 30 degrees:

Bilateral50

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/100 (6/30)

With remaining field of 31 to 45 degrees:

Bilateral30

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/70 (6/21)

With remaining field of 46 to 60 degrees:

Bilateral10

Unilateral10

Or evaluate each affected eye as 20/50 (6/15)

6081   Scotoma, unilateral:

Minimum, with scotoma affecting at least one-quarter of the visual field (quadrantanopsia) or with centrally located scotoma of any size10

Alternatively, evaluate based on visual impairment due to scotoma, if that would result in a higher evaluation

1Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350.

Ratings for Impairment of Muscle Function

Degree of diplopiaEquivalent
visual acuity

6090   Diplopia (double vision):

(a) Central 20 degrees5/200 (1.5/60)

(b) 21 degrees to 30 degrees

(1) Down15/200 (4.5/60)

(2) Lateral20/100 (6/30)

(3) Up20/70 (6/21)

(c) 31 degrees to 40 degrees

(1) Down20/200 (6/60)

(2) Lateral20/70 (6/21)

(3) Up20/40 (6/12)

Note: In accordance with 38 CFR 4.31, diplopia that is occasional or that is correctable with spectacles is evaluated at 0 percent.

6091   Symblepharon:

Evaluate under the General Rating Formula for Diseases of the Eye, lagophthalmos (diagnostic code 6022), disfigurement (diagnostic code 7800), etc., depending on the particular findings, and combine in accordance with §4.25

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1155)

[73 FR 66550, Nov. 10, 2008, as amend

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I do have a prescription for reading glasses, but I did not need glasses for driving or watching television.  Because of their mistake I do need a prescription for driving and reading multi line sentences.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

  "The eye clinic scheduled an eye exam for me last year at a private eye doctor.  When I told him of my problem he looked and found that during the cataract surgery the tech that performed the procedure had nick an eye muscle."

I suggest you get copies of all of your VA medical records, and the private ones from this eye doctor.

And see if the eye doctor would be willing do  an IMO/IME for you.

1151 IMO/IMEs are a little different than regular ones. I thought the VA could say they mitigated the damage with corrective glasses- however it appears the private doctor might have prescribed the corrective glasses-

When I net my eye surgeon, after he examined my eyes, he found no other underlying conditions, except for the cataracts and said he could give me 20/20 distance vision.That is what I got.

If I had to wear distance glasses after the surgery-I would have seen my lawyer-

I do suggest that you file the 1151 claim.

 

This thread below might help you :

 

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use