Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Proposed Reduction and Reexamintion Question

Rate this question


TideWarrior

Question

The last month has been somewhat hectic to say the least due to the VA seemingly being aggressive with my current disabilities and claims.

1) I went last June for a C & P for Plantar Fasciitis. I received a rating for 50% in both feet. It well documented in my service record and has worsened over the years. I went last September for a C & P exam for Gout. A decision was made in October denying me a rating but had to call this past April to receive the letter as they never it sent it to me. They said they had my old address but every other letter came to my current.  Anyone that letter stated that my Gout was present while on active duty but is was unmistakable that it was was preexisting and that military service did not aggravate it. I never had gout prior to the service. I met the current criteria for 60% for gout in my current condition battling with it. Now that I am looking to appeal because as mentioned I did not have it prior to service. But my real concern here is I received a letter last month stating that during the gout exam the examiner notes regarding my gout should improved condition for my plantar fasciitis and a proposed reduction for it from 50% to 0% would go into effect September 1st. That will currently lower me from 90% to 80%. My question here can the VA propose a reduction without a reexamination and notice of the reexamination. They are using the C & P exam for gout to reduce my plantar fasciitis.

2) I just received two days ago a call from 3rd party, not a letter from the VA, for a scheduled appointment for reexamination of a current disability(50%) in 10 days. I understand the VA can ask for one but I was under the impression that if past the 5 year mark it was considered protected/stabilized the VA can not or needs a very good reason to do so. The disability(Chronic Sinusitis) has not improved and still treated even after two surgeries. I was told to contact the VA for a reconsideration on the exam. Should I contact the VA and should the VA be asking for reexamination for this disability?

I have been using a local VA rep to help with my claims. Should I continue or am I at the point I need to contact a lawyer. If my current disabilities remain and no reduction I stay at 90%. If the gout meets the criteria as it shows on the C & P exam but is proven not to be prior to military service I would go to 100%. Maybe that is why they seem to be coming hard at me.

Thanks for any advice or help.

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

unfortunately Yes they can send us to an exam anytime they feel like it  unless you have the 20 year protection rule enforced.

That Dr that mention your improvement on anything  is what trigger the exam...don't sweat this  just go to the exam take any medical records with you to show you actually have got worse and now you been diagnose with gout...so you maybe getting an increase and not a reduction.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Don't let them intimidate you.  You need to go to a hearing and tell your side of the story.  Will the local VA rep go to your hearing or supply someone onsite to help at your hearing?  This is a question that you need to ask.  As far as a lawyer, most work on an agreement that they collect 20% of your award.  I do not think you can get a lawyer to go to a reduction hearing unless they are pro bono.  Good luck and remember that if you lose at the hearing you have the right to appeal to the BVA.  It takes a while but they are usually less combative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"But my real concern here is I received a letter last month stating that during the gout exam the examiner notes regarding my gout should improved condition for my plantar fasciitis and a proposed reduction for it from 50% to 0% would go into effect September 1st. 

You mean the examiner said the gout improved the plantar fasciitis?

That is absolutely ridiculous and it took me mere seconds to find this:

 

Can gout cause plantar fasciitis?
Gout. Gout is a common complex form of arthritis. ... A build-up of urate crystals in your joints causes inflammation and severe pain experienced during gout flare-ups. Unlike plantar fasciitis, gout is linked to arthritis and affects the joints, not the ligaments in the feet.Jan 9, 2018
----------------------------------------------------------
Have you googled the examiner to see what qualifications they have to opine on a podiatric disability?
Can you scan and attach the C & P exam here? (cover C file # , name, address prior to scanning it.
I have made this point here about an hour ago somewhere here and MANY times over the past 20 years-
If you do not rebutt errors in C & P exams, or in any decision that holds other incorrect statements- your claim is doomed to the hamster wheel.It might NEVER succeed.
 
Every single claim I ever had, as a widow-( ebenefits said I had 53 issues) held errors in the posthumous C & P exams as well as with the VCAA, and a multitude of other errors....and I fought back. Aggressively!   I got even worse after I graduated from AMU- a military school, for my degree.My main instruction came from a Major in USMC-he hated having a civilian student and made that clear to me until he read my first thesis.He ended up given me all A's- tactical  warfare maneuvers-I applied my AMU knowledge at that point to all my paper VA warfare claims.
 
Othwerwise I would have Never won a single claim and the VA would have gotten away with causing my husband's death.
 
As I mentioned before my husband in his lifetime and I were part of the old Prodigy BBS-pre-internet as it is now.Our main advocate was a former retired  BVA attorney who said many times- if you do not correct an error the VA makes-an error that will most likely impact on your claim-
the position of the VA is that you have accepted the error as fact.
 
I
 
 
 
Edited by Berta
added more

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

Also the examiner can't preposed a reduction  he might can state it  but you need to wait and see if you get a reduction letter from your RO.  IF you do then you have 60 days to let the R.O. know what you want to do  DRO Hearing or travel video hearing, you might just get a denial and not a proposed reduction   need to wait and see...in the mean time start gathering up your medical records that are favorable to your claim/claim's

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I received a letter that the proposed reduction would take place. The reduction was based on the examiner saying they examined my feet and there was tenderness and it was improved. Again I was never asked to remove my shoes or never asked anything regarding plantar fasciitus. Have requested a hearing for the reduction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave119 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Brew earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rowdy01 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Laddib45 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use