Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

BVA Decision on 2009 Claim in the Mail



Update! Received notification on Ebenefits and Vets.gov that a BVA decision was made on one of my 2009 claims...the letter is in the mail. That claim was denied.  Five other claims were sent back to the VA for further development...this is the third time.   My docket is 11-12-911. I really don't know what to say...must be patience until the end.

Best Regards


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Gentlemen, Start your engines!

    A BVA denial is the PERFECT TIME to hire an attorney.  Once you get the letter, scan it into your computer, so you can email it to different attorney's.  Why is it the perfect time?  Because the CAVC almost always awards Veterans EAJA fees to pay the attorney fees.  This means you can hire an attorney and have little or no attorney fees to be paid by you.  

    My suggestion is you send your denial to Chris Attig, probably CCK law, and maybe even a few others on this list.  Send it only to attorney's who practice at the CAVC.  Go here and pick several:


You have to act quickly.  It takes time for the attorneys to review your case and decide, for sure, if they want to represent you, and for them to file an appeal in your behalf.  You should need "0" upfront fees.  So, as soon as you get the envelope, scan it it and start sending it to attorneys.  Several may decline to represent you, for multiple reasons.  Dont be discouraged.  Attorneys often have a "niche" that they like.  Some may like EED's, some may like PTSD, some may like tdiu.  Some may be too busy to represent you.  That is normal.  Pick a few you like.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I'd caution you to wait for the BVA Remanded Decisions, especially since you've waited this long. Have you put a pencil to the possible Retro Due from the pending remanded issues, as well as this recently Denied issue?

VA lawyers will be looking at your Retro Possibility, a Legal fee of 20% of $100K for very little work might spark the Big firm's interest but I doubt it.

Contact the Vet Legal Consortium in DC, PRO BONO representation for BVA and CAVC.  I've seen a Nam Vet get turned down by a couple well know VA Legal Firms (Claimed Too Busy, Ya it was the low Retro. He caned his "Waste Of Time" POA-VSO right before the BVA Denial, ended up getting Denied at BVA with Vet Consortium Representation. VCR immediately filed with CAVC, within 6 mos got all (3) Denied Issues Remanded to RO. Got a $16K+ Legal Fee Awarded by CAVC and paid by VA, not the Vet.

A year later, RO Awarded SMC K ED $104 per month, with Retro of about $6K. What legal Firm for Fee would have signed on for the 20% $1200.00. The other (2) Denied issues, RO Awarded Hypertension SC 0% (No Pay) and Denied his claimed blood Cancer again.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


    With all due respect, I dont recommend waiting (for the remanded issues) to complete to appeal those denied issues.  Reason:  The appeal period will expire in 120 days, probably before the VARO completes the remand.  This will render the denied issues as final and not appealable, except for CUE.  

   To reiterate, start your engines and appeal the denied issues (only), and let the remanded issues take its course.  You can not appeal a "remand" but you can appeal any denied issues in a partial denial/partial remand.  The VA has just cut your claims in half...some remanded, some denied.  The appeal clock is running on the denied issues.  

    And..this is a big deal...the VA may be willing to negotiate..ok, we will award this, if you drop that..it happens a lot..but only when the claims are pending and not final.  With an issue that is final, (no appeal filed in the appeal period), there is no negotiations.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines