Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 1

It's Official! Awesome BVA Decision Received. Appeal for EED?

Rate this question


acesup

Question

I received my BVA Decision Letter this afternoon.  I feel totally vindicated in that the judge repeatedly pointed out that my STRs and medical records plus nexus letters and IMOs provided the basis for granting Service Connection, while the C&P medical examiners and the VARO failed to thoroughly address several issues of secondary SC, thereby denying my claims based on "inadequate" negative opinions to which he assigned "no probative value".

Wow.  Just wow.  I had some incredibly good nexus letters/opinions from several doctors, some specialists, but they were ignored in the 2011 denials and subsequent DRO Review.

The effective date for TDIU and SMC (s) was set back to 2009.  

However, I applied for two of the granted issues (OSA and sciatica) plus TDIU in 2007, in a claim that was apparently sent to sleep with the fishes back during the "Shreddergate" scandal in 2007.  I asserted that fact in 2009, and received a VA Fast Letter stating that the 2007 filing would be recognized.

I'm not 100% certain whether I should pursue this, but I will definitely be looking at it.  If I do want to file NOD for the date, will it be to BVA or VARO?  And, what is the deadline?

Edited by acesup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1
26 minutes ago, acesup said:

I asserted that fact in 2009, and received a VA Fast Letter stating that the 2007 filing would be recognized.

Do you mean a VARO letter or a Fast letter issued by VA Central?

Do you have a copy of your C file?

Did the BVA mention the 2007 TDIU claim at all?

What is the last you heard from your VARO on the TDIU filed in 2007 ?

If I were you I would order a Copy of the C file from your VARO, and also go to www.va.gov and click on Contact Us amd then click on Ask a Question, and you will be directed to IRIS_ follow their instructions and ask them for the status on that older TDIU claim . Ask for an email reply.

Can you scan and attach here the letter as to the 2007 filing?

Cover C file # and name prior to scanning it.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Hi Berta, thanks for coming in on this issue!

My memory isn't as great as I sometimes believe it to be. I still think I did get a written acknowledgement of the Fast Letter deal, but can't find anything like that so far.  I didn't actually get a "Fast Letter" from the VA, but back at the time, a Peggy Rep gave me a Fast Letter 08-41 to cite when making the claim. 

B.V.A. did not mention the 2007 date anywhere, neither do the denials I got in 2011 and 2014.  BVA is granting everything back to Oct. 2009, the date of the rest of my claimed conditions.

What I do have:

My October, 2009 letter to VARO-Little Rock asserting that in May 2007, I submitted a written claim to VARO-Houston (I lived in that area during that period).  I also included a copy of the original 2007 typed claim.  (It was not required to be on any official form back then, so typed and signed was okay.)  I sent it Certified Mail, so have the return receipt from the RO.

On Dec. 3, 2009, after learning that VARO-Waco was going to be handling my claim, I then sent Waco a letter and documents in support of the 2007 claim.  Once again, I sent it Certified Mail, and have a return receipt.

Having not heard a specific response, on Dec. 22, 2009 I went online to VONAPP and submitted a Form 21-4138 restating my situation, and again citing the VA Fast Letter 08-41 that would cover it.

A response from IRIS showing an inquiry about the 2007 claim, but doesn't actually answer it.

A VCAA letter for my claim with "What Have We Received?" showing "Letter from you with copy of your claim dated May 3, 2007"

I'll attach files.  

 

VAEvidence2007EED.pdf

Edited by acesup
omissions
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Here's the applicable info from VA Fast Letter 08-41.  My claim was within the covered dates, and my claim was re-asserted before the Fast Letter expiration.

Fast Letter 08-41 states in part:
"The Secretary has determined that temporary special claims handling procedures are appropriate to relax certain administrative claim submission requirements for claimants who assert they submitted a claim or evidence within the 18 months preceding the date all document shredding activities ceased in VA regional offices; that is, claims or evidence submitted between April 14, 2007, and October 14, 2008. These temporary procedures are established to ameliorate any loss of claims, information, or evidence that may have occurred as a result of inappropriate document disposal in VA regional offices during this period. 
RO personnel will use the temporary special claims handling procedures set out in the attached enclosures to assist claimants and representatives in establishing whether or not a claim was previously submitted to VA but was not retained and acted upon. 

Claimants must assert their request for consideration under the temporary special claims handling procedures in response to the 2008 records incident within one year from November 14, 2008. RO personnel will exercise the Secretary’s authority to recognize a claimant’s or representative’s assertion that a claim and/or supporting evidence had been previously submitted to VA during the 18-month window from April 14, 2007 to October 14, 2008. The effective date will be established as though the claim was received on the date asserted by the claimant. Effective dates earlier than April 14, 2007, may be established based upon receipt of credible evidence supporting the earlier date of document submission.



This letter self-rescinds on November 30, 2009. 
"

Edited by acesup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Submit it all and ask for a reconsideration from the BVA. If your documents were in your CFile, they should approve it right off. If not, you can withdraw the reconsideration so you can appeal the BVA decision for an EED. Just watch the clock so you dont go past the deadline for the appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

This is a perfect time for you to get an attorney, by appealing to the cavc (the effective date).  

An attorney will  review your board decision, along with your file and entitlement theories, and decide if he or she will represent you at the CAVC.   

Before you start worrying about attorney fees, these are often paid by eaja when appealing to the CAVC.  So you get an attorney at no cost  to you.  Hire one experienced at the CAVC.  

https://www.vetadvocates.org/cpages/sustaining-members-directory

I recommend Chris Attig, Ken Carpenter (Topeka Kansas), CCK, Hill and Pontoon, as they are experienced pros.  Im currently represented at the CAVC with Chris Attig, in an effective date issue, so I have taken my own advice.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I ALSO, am a 2008 shreddergate victim, and, like yourself, have not gotten full relief yet.  My last attorney, Julie Glover, indicated all "shredder" appeals are currently on hold right now, that is why you dont see them.  

Its my personal opinion that the 18 month "window" is arbritrary and capricous, because VA shredded evidence PRIOR to the 18 month window, and also after the 18 month window.  There is no good reason to limit this to this period, except to save the government money, from valid claimants.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use