Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 1
Sign in to follow this  

It's Official! Awesome BVA Decision Received. Appeal for EED?


I received my BVA Decision Letter this afternoon.  I feel totally vindicated in that the judge repeatedly pointed out that my STRs and medical records plus nexus letters and IMOs provided the basis for granting Service Connection, while the C&P medical examiners and the VARO failed to thoroughly address several issues of secondary SC, thereby denying my claims based on "inadequate" negative opinions to which he assigned "no probative value".

Wow.  Just wow.  I had some incredibly good nexus letters/opinions from several doctors, some specialists, but they were ignored in the 2011 denials and subsequent DRO Review.

The effective date for TDIU and SMC (s) was set back to 2009.  

However, I applied for two of the granted issues (OSA and sciatica) plus TDIU in 2007, in a claim that was apparently sent to sleep with the fishes back during the "Shreddergate" scandal in 2007.  I asserted that fact in 2009, and received a VA Fast Letter stating that the 2007 filing would be recognized.

I'm not 100% certain whether I should pursue this, but I will definitely be looking at it.  If I do want to file NOD for the date, will it be to BVA or VARO?  And, what is the deadline?

Edited by acesup

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1
26 minutes ago, acesup said:

I asserted that fact in 2009, and received a VA Fast Letter stating that the 2007 filing would be recognized.

Do you mean a VARO letter or a Fast letter issued by VA Central?

Do you have a copy of your C file?

Did the BVA mention the 2007 TDIU claim at all?

What is the last you heard from your VARO on the TDIU filed in 2007 ?

If I were you I would order a Copy of the C file from your VARO, and also go to www.va.gov and click on Contact Us amd then click on Ask a Question, and you will be directed to IRIS_ follow their instructions and ask them for the status on that older TDIU claim . Ask for an email reply.

Can you scan and attach here the letter as to the 2007 filing?

Cover C file # and name prior to scanning it.

Edited by Berta
  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Hi Berta, thanks for coming in on this issue!

My memory isn't as great as I sometimes believe it to be. I still think I did get a written acknowledgement of the Fast Letter deal, but can't find anything like that so far.  I didn't actually get a "Fast Letter" from the VA, but back at the time, a Peggy Rep gave me a Fast Letter 08-41 to cite when making the claim. 

B.V.A. did not mention the 2007 date anywhere, neither do the denials I got in 2011 and 2014.  BVA is granting everything back to Oct. 2009, the date of the rest of my claimed conditions.

What I do have:

My October, 2009 letter to VARO-Little Rock asserting that in May 2007, I submitted a written claim to VARO-Houston (I lived in that area during that period).  I also included a copy of the original 2007 typed claim.  (It was not required to be on any official form back then, so typed and signed was okay.)  I sent it Certified Mail, so have the return receipt from the RO.

On Dec. 3, 2009, after learning that VARO-Waco was going to be handling my claim, I then sent Waco a letter and documents in support of the 2007 claim.  Once again, I sent it Certified Mail, and have a return receipt.

Having not heard a specific response, on Dec. 22, 2009 I went online to VONAPP and submitted a Form 21-4138 restating my situation, and again citing the VA Fast Letter 08-41 that would cover it.

A response from IRIS showing an inquiry about the 2007 claim, but doesn't actually answer it.

A VCAA letter for my claim with "What Have We Received?" showing "Letter from you with copy of your claim dated May 3, 2007"

I'll attach files.  



Edited by acesup

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Here's the applicable info from VA Fast Letter 08-41.  My claim was within the covered dates, and my claim was re-asserted before the Fast Letter expiration.

Fast Letter 08-41 states in part:
"The Secretary has determined that temporary special claims handling procedures are appropriate to relax certain administrative claim submission requirements for claimants who assert they submitted a claim or evidence within the 18 months preceding the date all document shredding activities ceased in VA regional offices; that is, claims or evidence submitted between April 14, 2007, and October 14, 2008. These temporary procedures are established to ameliorate any loss of claims, information, or evidence that may have occurred as a result of inappropriate document disposal in VA regional offices during this period. 
RO personnel will use the temporary special claims handling procedures set out in the attached enclosures to assist claimants and representatives in establishing whether or not a claim was previously submitted to VA but was not retained and acted upon. 

Claimants must assert their request for consideration under the temporary special claims handling procedures in response to the 2008 records incident within one year from November 14, 2008. RO personnel will exercise the Secretary’s authority to recognize a claimant’s or representative’s assertion that a claim and/or supporting evidence had been previously submitted to VA during the 18-month window from April 14, 2007 to October 14, 2008. The effective date will be established as though the claim was received on the date asserted by the claimant. Effective dates earlier than April 14, 2007, may be established based upon receipt of credible evidence supporting the earlier date of document submission.

This letter self-rescinds on November 30, 2009. 

Edited by acesup

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Submit it all and ask for a reconsideration from the BVA. If your documents were in your CFile, they should approve it right off. If not, you can withdraw the reconsideration so you can appeal the BVA decision for an EED. Just watch the clock so you dont go past the deadline for the appeal.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

This is a perfect time for you to get an attorney, by appealing to the cavc (the effective date).  

An attorney will  review your board decision, along with your file and entitlement theories, and decide if he or she will represent you at the CAVC.   

Before you start worrying about attorney fees, these are often paid by eaja when appealing to the CAVC.  So you get an attorney at no cost  to you.  Hire one experienced at the CAVC.  


I recommend Chris Attig, Ken Carpenter (Topeka Kansas), CCK, Hill and Pontoon, as they are experienced pros.  Im currently represented at the CAVC with Chris Attig, in an effective date issue, so I have taken my own advice.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines