Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

ANYONE MEMBER SC FOR RADIC AND OTHER NERVES?

Rate this question


paulcolrain

Question

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I am. I am rated 60% for LLE due to partial paralysis of the sciatic nerve, 10% on the RLE.  No other nerves, but spine is SC @40% and every nerve comes from the spine.


Scoliosis is included w/spine so anything that comes from that will be secondary (for the rest of my life).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I REALLY THINK I FOUND WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR.... THE LAST 3 SENTENCES ARE GREAT....

Significantly, the December 2014 VA examination report is the most specifically detailed medical evidence of record documenting clinical findings describing the neurological impairments of the Veteran's right lower extremity.  This examination report includes a checklist for identification of each individual nerve manifesting impairment in this case.  The examiner completed the checklist with markings that indicate "Moderate" incomplete paralysis of the sciatic nerve, which the Board has discussed in the decision section above and in the prior August 2015 Board decision as the basis of the award of an increased 20 percent rating for the right lower extremity impairment.  However, the December 2014 VA examination report's checklist also marks "Moderate" incomplete paralysis of five other nerves of the right lower extremity: "External popliteal (common peroneal) nerve," "Musculocutaneous (superficial peroneal) nerve," "Anterior tibial (deep peroneal) nerve," "Internal popliteal (tibial) nerve)," and "Posterior tibial nerve."  Paralysis of these nerves may be rated under 38 C.F.R. § 4.124a, Diagnostic Codes 8521, 8522, 8523, 8524, and 8525, respectively.

 

The Board has considered whether the impairment attributable to impairment of these nerves may be contemplated in the rating already assigned under Diagnostic Code 8520 for paralysis of the sciatic nerve such that separate ratings for the other nerves could potentially be prohibited as pyramiding.  38 C.F.R. § 4.14.  However, the evidence in this particular case does not allow the Board (limited to its lay sensibilities and reliant upon competent medical evidence) to make this determination with adequately informed clarity.  The Board takes judicial notice of the fact (without relying upon the information for any binding determination in this case) that the identified nerves involve branches of the sciatic nerve such that some degree of overlapping symptomatology / impairment may be suggested.  However, it is not clear that assignment of separate ratings for multiple nerve involvement is necessarily inappropriate in this case.  The Board observes that it is a matter of public record that the Court, albeit in a non-precedential manner, has noted that there are situations where, for example, "compensating the appellant's sciatic nerve symptoms separately [from external popliteal (common peroneal) nerve symptoms] would appear to not run afoul [of] the rule against pyramiding.  38 C.F.R § 4.14 (2015)."  Defazio v. McDonald, 2015 U.S. App. Vet. Claims LEXIS 1304 (U.S. App. Vet. Cl. Sept. 28, 2015) (non-precedential).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
3 hours ago, pwrslm said:

I am. I am rated 60% for LLE due to partial paralysis of the sciatic nerve, 10% on the RLE.  No other nerves, but spine is SC @40% and every nerve comes from the spine.

https://www.spineuniverse.com/conditions/back-pain/low-back-pain/lumbar-radiculopathy-low-back-leg-pain

ABOVE IS GREAT TO PROVE… STENOSIS CAUSED THE SENSORY ISSUE OF THE FOLLOWING NERVE ROUTE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

The NIH also can get you some of the peer reviewed journal articles on spine issues. What you have at the spine universe site is sufficient to introduce as common medical knowledge. I have used that before to provide a basis to show that C&P exams were Bull%#!t. First time they tried to say I was not qualified to diagnose myself, I countered w/statement that I didn't diagnose anything, only proved that the C&P examiner contradicted common med knowledge and could not be given credibility. I have a folder on my PC full of this stuff. (tell me its sane....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use