Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Awaiting my NOD outcome

Rate this question


Patton

Question

I filed a NOD in January 2017 for limitation of ankle (Right) motion , left Knee strain, lower Back pain, bilateral Plantar Fasciitis and Insomnia (they listed as dysthymic disorder). Since I filed the NOD, I received 30% for persistent depressive disorder (dysthymia) with anxious distress which includes chronic sleep impairment. I currently have a rating of 40% (VA math of 43%). On eBenefits it shows a completion date in November. The wait is driving me crazy. 

In April I had a C&P Exam for my Ankle, Knee and Back. I received a copy of my C-File that included my C&P results. She directly SC my Ankle stating:

  • Lateral Collateral Ligament Sprain (chronic) - right
  • Acute Ankle Sprains (during Service)
  • Right Plantar Calcaneal Enthesophyte resulting in Ankle Pain
  • Right ROM: Abnormal Range, Dorsiflexion (normal range 0-20) results 0-10 and Plantar Flexion (normal range 0-45) results 0-20
  • Left ROM: Abnormal Range, Dorsiflexion (normal range 0-20) results 0-15 and Plantar Flexion (normal range 0-45) results 0-30

She stated that my knee condition is secondary to my ankle and the results are:

  • Left Knee Strain - Bilateral knees
  • Left recurrent Patellar dislocation - slight
  • Right ROM: Flexion (normal range 0-140) results 0-105 and Extension (normal range 140-0) results 105-0
  • Left ROM: Flexion (normal range 0-140) results 0-95 and Extension (normal range 140-0) results 95-0
  • The opposing joint does have evidence of damage as indicated by the exam abnormalities documented above.
     

She also stated that my lower back condition is secondary to my Ankle and the results are:

  • X-ray view 1: Possible Herniation of Disc. Diminished height L5 - S1 and Spurring on L2, L3 and L4
  • X-ray view 2: Spondylosis of the Spine and Spurring on L5
  • Lumbosacral Strain
  • Radiculopathy
  • Involvement of L4/L5/S1/S2/S3 nerve roots (sciatic nerve) - Right
  • Spondylosis of the spine
  • Initial ROM: Forward Flexion (normal range 0-90) results 0-75, Extension (0-30) 0-30, Right Lateral Flexion (0-30) 0-30, Left Lateral Flexion (0-30) 0-10, Right Lateral Rotation (0-30) 0-10, Left Lateral Rotation (0-30) 0-20
  • After repeated ROM: Forward Flexion (normal range 0-90) results 0-50, Extension (0-30) 0-30, Right Lateral Flexion (0-30) 0-30, Left Lateral Flexion (0-30) 0-20, Right Lateral Rotation (0-30) 0-10, Left Lateral Rotation (0-30) 0-15
  • Pain on rest Left Lateral Rotation 
  • Interference with sitting and standing
  • Passive ROM of the spine was not performed as it is not feasible to do this in a safe and reasonable manner.

I did not get an C&P for bilateral Plantar Fasciitis, but this has been well documented in my Military, VA and Private Medical Records. I did submit all of it when I filed the NOD, except for the shots that I received from the VA after filing. I have a Doctor's (Private) appointment tomorrow for Plantar Fasciitis and he said that he would do a DBQ but at this point, would submitting a DBQ delay, help or hurt my Claim? Or should I wait until the NOD is complete and if the claim is denied for Plantar Fasciitis, reopen it with new evidence (I.E. the shots and DBQ)?

What rating do you think I should receive? How is the Bilateral factor and pyramiding going to affect my claim? Is a secondary condition going to affect my rating?

Any thoughts on my outcome is appreciated and hopefully put my mine at ease!

Thank you,

Patton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

You posted:

Quote

  I did not get an C&P for bilateral Plantar Fasciitis,

A C and P isnt given every time.  It wont be given if there is

a) already medical evidence to support service connection

b) OR it also wont be given if a c and p exam wont change the outcome.    If you are lacking an "in service event", for example, a c and p exam wont provide that.  

YES, waiting drives us crazy.  This is why I recently opted into RAMP, even tho my attorney advised against it.  He said, "there are too many unknowns" in RAMP.    Well,  IMHO, the BIGGEST issue is WHEN.  A legacy appeal to the BVA is taking about 6 years now. At least.  I checked and my 2015 appeal hasnt yet been certified to the board (which takes 773 days, according the the BVA chairmans report), and there are over 140,000 Vets ahead of me in line..that is after I have already waited 3 years.  Given that it will take me another 4 or 5 MORE years, this is totally unacceptable to me in every way.  Even a denial is better, because I can appeal a denial and, at least, not be stuck in a VA "delay mud hole" for 7 years with legacy appeals.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the reply broncovet!

I opted into the RAMP and it was received on July 5th. The Plantar Fasciitis is very painful and I have lost many hours of sleep over it. I have never received a rating without an C&P, so that is very concerning to me. 

I think that I should get:

  • 10% for Plantar Fasciitis plus 10% for Bilateral.
  • 20% for Right Ankle and 10% for the Left or Bilateral?
  • 10% for Bilateral Knee (although I have limited ROM in both knees, it is not enough for a rating?).
  • 20% for lower back plus 10% for the sciatic nerve.

Does that sound realistic? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

Maybe.  You know your symptoms better than I do, and you can look up the schedular rating criteria for each, and compare your symptoms (only those which are documented in your cfile!!) with the criteria.  

However,  I did not read in your post where your doctors said the magic words.  Without these magic words, none of this means anything.  

The magic words are :  (drum roll):

Either:

A.  Your (current diagnosis) is "at least as likely as not" due to (in service event or aggravation).  

OR

B.  Your (CURRENT DIAGNOSOS) IS secondary to (an already service connected condition).  

If your doc does not say the "magic words", then SC is a no go.  The magic words are known as the Caluza element trio, and are required for service connection.  Many a Vet, and many a VSO, has overlooked the basics of Caluza and wound up with a denial.   However, people who read hadit, are not often fooled by this, because I repeatedly tell people to mind your Caluza's or get denied.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I believe these are the "magic words".

Knee - The claimed condition is at least as likely as not (50 percent or greater probability) proximately due to or the result of the Veteran’s service connected condition.

Provide rationale: Current severity of the service connected CONDITION warrants by proximity, association of the claimed secondary CONDITION. The disorder began subsequent to the service connected condition and is the direct result of the antecedent condition. The medical literature supports this. A nexus is established. Pt' right ankle pain caused an antalgic gait which resulted in poor posture/ambulation contributing to left knee pain/strain.

Back - The claimed condition is at least as likely as not (50 percent or greater probability) proximately due to or the result of the Veteran’s service connected condition.

Provide rationale: Current severity of the service connected CONDITION warrants by proximity, association of the claimed secondary CONDITION. The disorder began subsequent to the service connected condition and is the direct result of the antecedent condition. The medical literature supports this. A nexus is established. As a result of his ankle conditions physical exam reveals he had an antalgic gait. With antalgic gait there is increased rotation and bending of the trunk which could lead to low back symptoms.

Reference: Dr. Ian J. Harrington, B.A.Sc., P. Eng.,M.D., F.R.C.S.(C), M.S., MSc. Strath.). Limping and Back Pain, Discussion paper prepared for The Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal.March 2004,Revised: August 2013.

Ankle - The claimed condition was at least as likely as not (50 percent or greater probability) incurred in or caused by the claimed in-service injury, event, or illness.

Provide rationale: Veteran had no issues related to the claimed CONDITION prior to military service. Onset of the condition was during service, documented in the Service Medical Records. Medical literature reports that a severe ankle sprain can cause subsequent ankle sprains which result in chronic ankle pain. There is evidence of current, chronic and continuous treatment and care. A nexus has been established.

Reference: https://orthoinfo.aaos.org/en/diseases--conditions/sprained-ankle/

Hopefully others can use the References that she used.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use