Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
mcsanty

Appealing and effective date I need help

Question

 Good morning veterans 

After four years I finally  receive my NOD Rating decision ,and I’m happy with this  Reading decision, but I Disagree  with the effective date .

I have proof to show it should  it should be an early date  So , I decided to appeal the Effective  date,  I am not a good writer , And there is no VSO near me, so I have to do this on my own ,Where can I find samples of statements Or good written arguments that will help me write my own statement.

 Thank you 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1

Of all of my 20 year issues with VA, they always managed to get the EED correct-

But I can develop a sample from my own claims ,if they did do it wrong:

My husband was granted a 1151 100% P & T award back to Aug 1992, and  to the date of his death ( He died 23 years ago,this was a posthumous award. As his widow I am eligible for all accrued 1151 retro,under GC Pres Op 08-97.They gave the correct EED but I have CUE on the amount of retro which is wrong-

But 

Lets say VA said the EED was August 1993 in their decision instead of Aug 1992. 

"I would promptly file a CUE claim stating, the VA under auspices of 38 USC 5109, clearly violated 38 CFR 4.6

CUE Clear and unmistakable Error  38 USC 5109

38 CFR 4.6 

“Every element in any way affecting the probative value to be assigned to the evidence in each individual claim must be thoroughly and conscientiously studied by each member of the rating board in the light of the established policies of the Department of Veterans Affairs to the end that decisions will be equitable and just as contemplated by the requirements of the law. “ 38 CFR 4.6

 

( I have used this regulation many times and would have if they made the error above in his EED)because the evidence in VA's possession,when my husband died  clearly shows that his catatrophic stroke occurred in Aug 1992, by all evidence of record to include SSA award, VocRehab statement, AO Settlement Fund statements, etc etc etc , as well as his admission to the Bath VAMC in August 1992 and subsequent transfer to Syracuse VA 1992.

I have enclosed evidence you had but failed to properly consider under violation of 38 CFR 4.6,

and the error manifested a detrimental outcome to me, as his widow because you still owe me one year of retroactive accrued benefits at 100 % P & T."

And then I would enclose some of the evidence.

My point is

1.you need to state the error they made.

It is most probably a Legal error. You can file a NOD on the award letter but I think CUE (38 USC 5109) is the best bet and what most vets who feel their retro is wrong , file as CUE ,under 38 USC 5109 ,as the BVA website reveals.

2. You need to state the evidence you have enclosed ( that was in VA's possession)when they made the CUE. that should have garnered the better EED.

3. You need to state that their legal error was detrimental to you as the manifested outcome was not the proper Retoactive amount.

We have no idea why you feel your EED is wrong. Can you scan and attach here their rationale in the decision in the award letter, that includes the EED they arrived at?

Or is it the Audit they enclosed? I checked over 4 audits did VA on my claims, since 2003 and they were all wrong.One  to the tune of 40 thousand and the recent one is close to that in error as well.

VA ignored my letters on one audit but the Regional COunsel found it, i 2003 due to a differtent matter and order them via CUE to pay me.They did pay but that audit too was 11 thousand off.I cued that and They paid that as well.

 

Cover your  file # and name prior to scanning it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1

McSanty,

I can supply a letter for an eed that I am working on for the VA.  It might not be what you are looking for but here goes. I find that I have to leave all emotion out of the letter and state the facts, usually facts provided by a remand or a SOC.

In a remand.docx

Edited by vetquest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
29 minutes ago, Berta said:

Of all of my 20 year issues with VA, they always managed to get the EED correct-

But I can develop a sample from my own claims ,if they did do it wrong:

My husband was granted a 1151 100% P & T award back to Aug 1992, and  to the date of his death ( He died 23 years ago,this was a posthumous award. As his widow I am eligible for all accrued 1151 retro,under GC Pres Op 08-97.They gave the correct EED but I have CUE on the amount of retro which is wrong-

But 

Lets say VA said the EED was August 1993 in their decision instead of Aug 1992. 

"I would promptly file a CUE claim stating, the VA under auspices of 38 USC 5109, clearly violated 38 CFR 4.6

CUE Clear and unmistakable Error  38 USC 5109

38 CFR 4.6 

“Every element in any way affecting the probative value to be assigned to the evidence in each individual claim must be thoroughly and conscientiously studied by each member of the rating board in the light of the established policies of the Department of Veterans Affairs to the end that decisions will be equitable and just as contemplated by the requirements of the law. “ 38 CFR 4.6

 

( I have used this regulation many times and would have if they made the error above in his EED)because the evidence in VA's possession,when my husband died  clearly shows that his catatrophic stroke occurred in Aug 1992, by all evidence of record to include SSA award, VocRehab statement, AO Settlement Fund statements, etc etc etc , as well as his admission to the Bath VAMC in August 1992 and subsequent transfer to Syracuse VA 1992.

I have enclosed evidence you had but failed to properly consider under violation of 38 CFR 4.6,

and the error manifested a detrimental outcome to me, as his widow because you still owe me one year of retroactive accrued benefits at 100 % P & T."

And then I would enclose some of the evidence.

My point is

1.you need to state the error they made.

It is most probably a Legal error. You can file a NOD on the award letter but I think CUE (38 USC 5109) is the best bet and what most vets who feel their retro is wrong , file as CUE ,under 38 USC 5109 ,as the BVA website reveals.

2. You need to state the evidence you have enclosed ( that was in VA's possession)when they made the CUE. that should have garnered the better EED.

3. You need to state that their legal error was detrimental to you as the manifested outcome was not the proper Retoactive amount.

We have no idea why you feel your EED is wrong. Can you scan and attach here their rationale in the decision in the award letter, that includes the EED they arrived at?

Or is it the Audit they enclosed? I checked over 4 audits did VA on my claims, since 2003 and they were all wrong.One  to the tune of 40 thousand and the recent one is close to that in error as well.

VA ignored my letters on one audit but the Regional COunsel found it, i 2003 due to a differtent matter and order them via CUE to pay me.They did pay but that audit too was 11 thousand off.I cued that and They paid that as well.

 

Cover your  file # and name prior to scanning it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thank you for your help , Miss Bertha I will do it as soon as I get home from work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
9 minutes ago, vetquest said:

McSanty,

I can supply a letter for an eed that I am working on for the VA.  It might not be what you are looking for but here goes. I find that I have to leave all emotion out of the letter and state the facts, usually facts provided by a remand or a SOC.

In a remand.docx

Thank you  ,vet quest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Vet quest =that is a good letter- but I hope they get it-100% plus 60 or over for additional independent disability equals SMC S 

I used the SMC mandate and filed CUE when they failed to consider their mandate. 

The SMC  CUE I won , I stated was for "Lack of consideration of the SMC mandate". That was their legal error.

SMC is an inferred issue whenever the ratings warrant it to be considered.It is mandated by law.

I sent them the Mandate.It was dated years prior  to the decision I cued.

It was a DIC award letter clearly statng my husbands 100% SC P & T and his 1151 stroke rating, way over 60% and the fact he was Housebound as well supported the CUE.

My dumb vet rep at the time told me not to appeal the award because 1151 issues are different. They are not different. 

The established medical evidence they had at time of the alleged CUE fully supported the fact that they legally had to consider the SMC mandate.

I had to spell that out to them like they were 10 years old.

 

The SMC Mandate is stated here in the CUE forum somewhere-I got it from the VBM by NVLSP.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
    • I was denied SC for IBS and GERD IN 2011. In 2019 I was awarded SC for GERD. This CUE  is for 2011, both GERD and IBS. There are some odd aspects regarding the 2011 decision, the way it was written and the C&P report and the way it was written. I've tried to present this as clearly as I can. Note: the decision contradicts itself. the decision also contradicts the C&P Report. Honestly, I think the rater just got confused because the C&P was so poorly written. *THIS CUE HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED*Please let me know what you think. Appreciate all comments and suggestions. Thanks.

       

      VA RATING DECISION MARCH 23 2011 GERD IBS.pdf C P REPORT 7312010 GERD IBS.pdf GERD IBS CUE 2011(1).pdf

      C P ADDENDUM REQUEST RE DIAGNOSIS 7232010.pdf
      • 56 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines