Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 1

If the VA system is a "Pro-Claimant" System ...

Rate this question


WomanMarine

Question

... how come we have to FIGHT it for years? 

And If this is true, how come when the VA loses records, the Veteran is at fault?

Good read: 

Pro-Claimant_Paradox_Widener_Law_Rev_Article.pdf http://www.eagleveteranslaw.com/uploads/Pro-Claimant_Paradox_Widener_Law_Rev_Article.pdf

Edited by WomanMarine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 1
12 minutes ago, vetquest said:

I have only seen a non-adversarial relationship at the BVA.

Then maybe it is time I go to the BVA ... 😃

As the VA is claiming my medical records do NOT EXIST ...

“We have been unable to obtain records from West Los Angeles VA Medical Center for the period of 1976. We have determined that these records do not exist. We will now make a decision based on the evidence of record. Records were received from VAMC West L.A., dated November 14, 1979 through August 1983. (Veteran reports treatment beginning 1976). All treatment records available for these dates were received June 26, 2017.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

Did you collect travel pay when you went to that hospital?  This may not be of any assistance to you, but if the answer just happened to be "Yes", I'd see if the VA has 1976 financial records, just to prove you were there.

Do your VA records from 1979 through 1983 mention that you were seen/treated there in prior years?   

I doubt any of it was on computer back then, does the VA claim to have archived records from that era, but just not yours, or is this a problem that other vets had there too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1
  • Moderator

Many of us have gotten the "pro claimant non adversarial" laff.  I stopped laughing at about my 4 th BVA decision, when I still did not have all my benefits.  The "pro claimant non adversarial" stuff is the "SANTA CLause story" of the VA.  Once you have been in the VA system about 4 or 5 years, you finally realize its not the truth.  

Most VSO's, when they prepare a BVA brief for a VEteran to go to the BVA, remind the judges of Santa's reindeer, "the benefit of the doubt", which is to be delivered to each "good" Veteran on Christmas Eve.  Unfortuantely, the other 364 days of the year, you get the "real" VA.  

So, many of us hadit Vets have "hunkered down" for a long fight, and read and reread the CFR's and case law.  Then, many of us have helped other Vets before/after/during the long process of winning our benefits.  Im almost done...I have won 100 percent AND TDIU, and I am still fighting for SMC S and an earlier effective date.  Since I have not been able to work since 2002, and thats when I applied, I want that 2 more years of retro that I deserve, and SMC S.  As Alex posted, "Congress intended for (SMC S) to be awarded to Veterans who are unable to leave the home TO EARN AN INCOME, as oppossed to unable to leave the home at all."

(my paraphrase).  VA often misinterprets its own regulations to deny more VEts, and they denied me, essentially, because I showed up at VAMC for a housebound exam.  "You cant be housebound if you showed up for a housebound exam...Gotcha".  It isnt true.  The VA does not know its own defination of housebound, as defined by congress:

https://asknod.org/2014/08/25/cavc-howell-v-nicholson-what-smc-s-really-says/   in part:

In pertinet part:

Quote

The Secretary, citing to Senate Report No. 1745 (June 27, 1960), notes that in passing section 1114(s) Congress intended to provide additional compensation for veterans who were unable to overcome their particular disabilities and leave the house in order to earn an income as opposed to an inability to leave the house at all.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1
10 hours ago, acesup said:

Did you collect travel pay when you went to that hospital?  This may not be of any assistance to you, but if the answer just happened to be "Yes", I'd see if the VA has 1976 financial records, just to prove you were there.

Do your VA records from 1979 through 1983 mention that you were seen/treated there in prior years?   

I doubt any of it was on computer back then, does the VA claim to have archived records from that era, but just not yours, or is this a problem that other vets had there too?

I don't recall that I got travel pay and the records mention does not have the SIX MONTHS of therapy included. 

No, there were no computers, or that the VA used in 1976.  I started building some of the first Internets in 1993.

39 minutes ago, broncovet said:

Many of us have gotten the "pro claimant non adversarial" laff.  I stopped laughing at about my 4 th BVA decision, when I still did not have all my benefits.  The "pro claimant non adversarial" stuff is the "SANTA CLause story" of the VA.  Once you have been in the VA system about 4 or 5 years, you finally realize its not the truth.  

Most VSO's, when they prepare a BVA brief for a VEteran to go to the BVA, remind the judges of Santa's reindeer, "the benefit of the doubt", which is to be delivered to each "good" Veteran on Christmas Eve.  Unfortuantely, the other 364 days of the year, you get the "real" VA.  

So, many of us hadit Vets have "hunkered down" for a long fight, and read and reread the CFR's and case law.  Then, many of us have helped other Vets before/after/during the long process of winning our benefits.  Im almost done...I have won 100 percent AND TDIU, and I am still fighting for SMC S and an earlier effective date.  Since I have not been able to work since 2002, and thats when I applied, I want that 2 more years of retro that I deserve, and SMC S.  As Alex posted, "Congress intended for (SMC S) to be awarded to Veterans who are unable to leave the home TO EARN AN INCOME, as oppossed to unable to leave the home at all."

 

 

I guess I am in for the "long haul" and will 'hunker' ...

I think I have done pretty well, in comparison to others, so I am grateful ... as I am now 90% P&T and 100% UI. I decided to file because of President Trump's promise.  I filed on 1/20/17, Trump's Inauguration day. 

I started this journey, of course during Vietnam because I thought my country needed me ... And they were going to give me training as a Air Traffic Controller ... Well that went 'bust' after boot when they sent me to Glynco, GA for training and they did an eye exam ... Funny that they did not do that PRIOR to my joining so I could have chosen another MOS. :/

After I was 'medically discharged' I got my first job out of the Corps with Southern Pacific Railroad, where I had another issue with my knee and the VA put me in a full leg cast for six months ... How could those records be LOST?!?

I was told, because I took the 'severance pay' that I did NOT QUALIFY for disability payments.  Later I learned that I did, but the severance would be taken out of the disability. So I decided to apply for Voc Rehab and get the 'training' the USMC did not give me. I was denied, as they said I did not have enough 'time in service' ...  I joined as a reservist and later went regular. They were only counting my 'regular' service days and not the prior training. But when I applied for VR, and was denied, they issued a SC Health Card and said I had a 0% rating.

I reapplied in 1980, when I had another accident because of my SC, with the knowledge that they would deduct my 'severance pay' from my disability ... And reapplied. However this time they demanded the return of my SC Health Card and TOTALLY REMOVED MY 0%, when they should have INCREASED IT! I was in a financial nightmare and eventually became 'homeless' in San Francisco ... The VA really could have helped during those days! Because I was homeless I did not receive my denial letter, but the records do indicated that I 'tried' to re-establish within the year, when I landed in Reno. The issue in 1980 is the same one that I am having today. Even though it was only FOUR years after I had my SIX month ORTHO in Los Angeles, they could not locate the records to establish that the SC had occurred within the first year of my discharge. I believe this is a CUE.

So the only thing I can think to do, at this point, is to FINALLY get my VR, as now they cannot deny? I guess I will see about that ...

AND take this 'fight' to the BVA. 

I am also going to try to track down my IRS file that shows that I was TERMINATED from my job because of this accident. Southern Pacific Railroad is no longer and I figure the IRS is my best option of proving that I lost my job because of this SC injury, during that time period.

The Corps may not have trained me as an Air Traffic Controller, but they did teach me to be a FIGHTER! 

Oohrah!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • HadIt.com Elder

I would add this too the VA Regs also state that the Adjudicators (Raters) CAN'T use going to VA Appointments as  in leaving your house for work in order to deny a veterans claim for SMC S H.B.

I am not an Attorney or VSO, any advice I provide is not to be construed as legal advice, therefore not to be held out for liable BUCK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use