Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Unique11128

Appealing a Ramp decision to the BVA

Question

I was recently denied in the Ramp HLR. I found the NOD and received a letter from the VBA stating we have received your NOD received and  docketed. There was no docket number meantioned. My Attorney told me that there are 125 appeals to the board from the Ramp and half of them are going to a hearing so because I choose the lane not requesting a hearing I should be high on the list when they began in OCT 1st. Has anyone gotten there actual docket number for Ramp yet?

Will we be in a different docket system from the legacy docket system ?

Unique11128

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Update I filed a appeal to my Ramp (HLR) after being denied in July 18..I recieved a call from the BVA that my Ramp appeal was with a Judge awaiting his/her signature.

I hope and pray it's good news.

Unique11128 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 12/11/2018 at 1:52 PM, Unique11128 said:

Update I filed a appeal to my Ramp (HLR) after being denied in July 18..I recieved a call from the BVA that my Ramp appeal was with a Judge awaiting his/her signature.

I hope and pray it's good news.

Unique11128 

Anyword?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

That is great news, not just for you but for the rest of us in appeals!  It sounds like Ramp is working.   No, it wont get you benefits you dont deserve, but, since it takes an average of about 5 years to get to the Board in Legacy appeals, you have cut years off that by opting into RAMP.  

I see the problem is a 5 year wait to get to the BVA..that is unacceptable on many levels.  If RAMP can reduce that by years, then the RAMP program is a success.  

Next month, the VA is scheduled to go RAMP full time, I guess that means for everyone, not just those who have opted into RAMP previously.  

From my view, the RAMP program is a much needed improvement by taking out 2 unnecessary steps:

1.  SOC.  This is useless.  Its "VA's opinion" of your case.  Who cares what VA's opinion is?  What matters is the opinion of the decision maker.  I dont know of a single Vet that derived any benefit from the SOC with the exception that, when VA omitted it, the Vet had a bases for appeal.  

2.  Certification to the BOard.  This, also, is a waste of time.  Why should it take 3 years for the VARO to fill out a form which was mandantory in the legacy appeals?  The certification did not add any evidence..and it, too, seemed to serve no purpose except to delay the appeal.  

      By getting rid of these 2 time wasting steps, Ramp results in speeding up the claim, and no longer gives the VARO excuses to delay our appeal to the BVA.  

      Further, I can see the benefit of the option of HLR or SCL. (higher level review, or supplemental claim lane).  If you have no new evidence, and think the decision maker simply made a mistake (probably by not reading your evidence), then opt for HLR.  However, if you have new evidence, then you want to opt for the SCL.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Update I was approved for PTSD at the board i have been placed in a National que Waiting for the rating now. The sleep apnea is remanded even though I provide a private Doctor's Nexus and rationale connecting sleep apnea to Ptsd. There was no mention of the nexus or rationale in the the boards decision. When I called amc I was told there were missed by mistake and now they have me scheduled for a Comp exam with a General MD for the cause this week. Despite them looking in the record and seeing the nexus and rationale was in the file before my appeal went to the BVA basically they missed it. I hope this is not a development to deny

Unique11128 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Congratulations, on your quick appeal, at least partially successful.  Maybe you should call AMC back, and fax them the precise nexus.  However, remember with OSA, you have to have a doctor state your cpap is "medically necessary".  Even tho this is a stupid rule (What doctor is going to prescribe a cpap or anything else, and say, "No this isnt medically necessary, I prescribed it because I get a bonus kickback from the drug company for every prescription I write.")   

It pretty much goes without saying that your doctor prescribes stuff which he thinks is medically necessary, except maybe stuff like facelifts and cosmetic surgery.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines