Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Received BVA decision


Good afternoon! 

I received the BBE from the BVA and all of my contentions were remanded by the BVA Judge.  I’m fine with the remand; however, I believe the judge made an error writing my decision and I wanted to pick some brains. 

Two of my contentions, my right and left ankles were on appeal for a higher rating of 10 percent each.  The judge remanded both ankles for and entitlement to initial rating in excess of 20 percent each. 

I wonder if the 20 percent is a typo or if the judge is directing the RO to begin the rating at 20 percent after the C&Ps.  Have anyone seen this type of decision before?

Thank you!

Edited by Sailorman

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Is it possible you can post the remand?  Redacted of course.  It sounds interesting and there are some folks here with a lot of knowledge.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks where are they at? This site used to be saturated with knowledgeable people. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

This is kinda the trouble with Remands:  Its a "round trip ticket" to the hamster wheel.  As far as I know, the Veterans claim can be remanded, then the VARO denies, the Veteran appeals, the BVA remands again, and again, and again...just like the hamster wheel...where its spinning to fast to get off the wheel.  

Unfortuantely, you can not appeal a remand...you have no choice but to wait until VARO gets a "round tuit", and maybe decides to implement this remand, that is, to render a new decision.  Yes, you can appeal a denial, disability percentage, or effective date on any finally adjuticated decision.  

The good part about remands is this often means you can submit "new and material evidence" (38 cfr 3.156 b) and it will be effective "at the beginning of the appeal period."  THIS IS HUGE.  Example:

You get a remand on the two ankle issues.   You get an IMO doctor to show that the criteria more closely approximates 50 percent ratings for each.  You submit this IMO opinion, as N and m evidence, AND THE IMO DOCTOR MAKES IT CLEAR that your disability BEGAN (when you first applied).  This means, if awarded, you should get the earliest effective date, and you dont have to meet the "cue" criteria!!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
23 minutes ago, broncovet said:

Unfortuantely, you can not appeal a remand...you have no choice but to wait until VARO gets a "round tuit", and maybe decides to implement this remand, that is, to render a new decision.  Yes, you can appeal a denial, disability percentage, or effective date on any finally adjuticated decision.  


You can appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals for your district under three circumstances.  Clear and unmistakable error, arbitrary and capricious action (that hamster wheel if the Agency of Original essentially makes the same denial), and failure to assist if as in my case the VA Health Division didn't supply repeatedly requested evidence (such as radiographic film or other data upon which reports have been made without an etiology opinion).  Actually that third falls under the second but I purposely stated it as a third to demonstrate what arbitrary and capricious acts look like.

Comer v Peake:  "We have jurisdiction pursuant to 38
U.S.C. § 7292."

Cook v. Principi, 318 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir., 2002) “There are, however, two statutory exceptions to the rule of finality. First, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 5108, the Secretary must reopen a claim "f new and material evidence [regarding the claim] is presented or secured." Second, a decision "is subject to revision on the grounds of clear and unmistakable error." 38 U.S.C. §§ 5109A (decision by the Secretary) & 7111 (decision by the Board). These are the only statutory exceptions to the finality of VA decisions.”

It takes a $500.00 filing fee or a Forma Paupers claim to file a "Petition to Review" at the Federal Court of Appeals.  The administrative decision is supposed to be a finale decision but the "hamster wheel" provides the arbitrary and capricious mode to Petition a Review of an Agency Decision.

Attached are two Petitions I filed with the 10th Circuit, the Clerk's Orders in response, and my responses in draft form to date to the Clerk's Orders.

Just because I filed and responded to the Clerk's Orders doesn't mean it will get a hearing before the Court.  Have to wait to see what the Respondent comes up with in response to the Orders and then reply to that searching their case citations for opposing citations and relying upon Section 4 of the 14 Amendment, the 5th Amendment holding that "Time of War" and "Public Danger" means the inability of the Courts in their Jurisdictions cannot function not "on active duty" as has been held previously under the Article I citation without seeing Article 5 as limiting the inability to get a 7th Amendment District Court Jury Trier of Fact to get off that hamster wheel.

I'm delaying filing although I'm almost finished so that the Respondents won't have my Briefs to work from for their initial required Briefs.

As you can see, I'm arguing finality from my age of 77 and "arbitrary and capricious acts" depriving me of a prompt access to the CAVC for a decision at that level which could be then appealed to the FCA if necessary.  I'll try to remember to post on this thread the results as they come in.

20180914 FILED BCNR pet with clerk ltr.pdf

20180914 FILED BVA review c ltr.pdf

20180917 10th Order BCNR review.pdf

20180918 Clerk Order BVA review.pdf

20181001 10th Brief review BCNR tolling.pdf

20181001 Brief BVA 20170511.wbk.pdf

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Thanks a million gentleman. You left me a lot to research. I’m beginning now. I truly appreciate both of your assistance. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By WomanMarine
      I have an appeal in with the BVA. 
      In 1980 when I asked for an increase on my 0% rated disability, rather than increasing it, they totally removed it! I believe this is a CUE. I have just recently been awarded my disability @ the 100% unemployability rate. The V.A. even states in my decision that my knee should have been 30% PRIOR to service ... 
      I submitted my NOD for new effective date October 2018 and have not heard a word; except folks @ 1-800 telling me it does not exist; only to recant when I tell them I am looking at the original ... 
      Is this normal?
    • By drewdabbs
      This may have been answered elsewhere but as a long time lurker I have not been able to find it. A brief background. I am at 80% SC (70% for a mental health disorder, 10% for a couple of physical disabilities). But nearly all of this has been awarded through BVA appeal process that has been on going since 2009. Part of the appeal has been TDIU. In short the RO did not automatically send the 21-8940 to start the process when I hit 70% RO and I didn't know I qualified. Once I did know I appealed and it became a part of the 2009 ongoing BVA appeal, but joined it in about 2014. A social/industrial survey was ordered (2015) but not completed as the social worker at the hospital completing it didn't know what it was (he thought it was a survey of current patients). So the BVA appeal has gone back to the common BVA Remand to RO SSoC to BVA Remand tennis game for a few years. A mess.

      Here are my current questions: I have been awarded new service connections and ratings since the TDIU denial part joined the appeal. I have also moved, so the 2009 appeal is at the original RO where is any new claim would go to my, now, more local RO.
      1). is there any way possible to file for TDIU now, through my local office since new service connected disabilities are present?
      2). Just general opinion if you could, but I had been told that it is detrimental to an appeal to request that RO handling the case be changed or moved to the most recent or local RO. Does anyone have any insight if this is actually true? The old RO is a hassle, its keeps sending appointments and decisions to the old address no matter how many times and ways I update my address, for instance.
      Thanks vets, any help I get I'll try and pay it forward.
    • By cavscout1967
      Hello, I checked ebenefits and it said I received a GRANT from the CAVC for increased rating "anklyosis of the shoulder." I had appealed for depression and anxiety as well and they were not addressed on ebenefits so I am guessing it is still on remand at the BVA level. Ebenefits also stated that my remand would take 16-24 months. I am currently 60% with 10 for tinnitus, 20 for ankle, 20 for shoulder, 20 for shoulder radicupathy, 10 for knee. What does all this mean? if I am not providing the information needed for input I am happy to do that but at this time I dont know what else to provide you guys.
      Thank you.
    • By Pie1esRojas2005
      BVA granted 100% Dec 20, 2018. Filed my claim Feb 2012. It's been a long hard road. Now I am just curious  how long before I here from the regional office, and back pay.
  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines