Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  



Office of management and budget audited my account. A waiver request was denied. The VA claimed that retro payment in error. They began deducting 1000 out of my benefit pay.

Because I was doubtful of the audit results, I reviewed my pay history on e-benefits and discovered evidence that contradicted the audit. The VA claimed that the decision was based on my claim folder and previous award letter.

A review of my pay history and the recent awards letter was not mentioned as a evidence in the decision to attach my monthly benefit. 

Because I had outstanding appeals, the retro payment made sense. I contacted the 800# who verified that the payment was legitimate.

I payed outstanding debts and payed off my car note. My joy was interrupted by the Office of management and budgets' claim that the pay was an error.

I have crunched the numbers and I am certain of the VA'error. I have completed the form 9. Should this form be sent thru the usual system, This would mean a long wait for any decision.

Meanwhile I am in deeper financial waters. My credit score has dropped. My benefit includes aid and attendance. The reduction erased that allowance.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

A similar story has been retold by many of us, myself included.  I lost my home in 2005-2006, waiting on my claim to go through a long appeal process.  

Opting into RAMP may make your process a lot quicker, if indeed you are eligible for RAMP, which you may well be.  

We have a post here on RAMP, and how you opt in.  Opting into RAMP COULD mean your pain lasts a shorter period of time, it sounds like you need to select Supplemental Claim lane and add new evidence.  

If you are in dire financial straits, then there are some states where they help Vets.   However, since you are at 100 percent, it sounds like you are earning "at least" 3000 per month, which is above the "poverty level" that the VA wants Veterans to be at.   According to the VA, the poverty level is about 13,000 per year for a single Vet.  Married Vets with dependents is more.  


You could also try resubmitting your "new evidence" you think they did not consider, which could reopen due to n and m evidence under 38 CFR 3.156 b.  

It may, but probably wont be effective for you to contact IRIS or the white house hotline unless you can get a hold of a Veteran friendly VA employee who has the authority to fix this glitch.  But do try it anyway.  VA has a "culture of denial" in many of its offices, where they seem to want to create as many more homeless Veterans as possible, by delaying and denying benefits to deserving Vets.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Is this consider a claim?

I mean if were awarded a grant for our disability's and the VA Decides to go over our records  or their records and finds that they supposedly over paid us.

We do have our due process to respond,  if this is considered a claim then they should not be taking anything from our compensation until a decision is made one way or the other 

so if this would be considered a claim  then the veteran can keep it on Appeal and that could be years for a decision...but it just seems to me we have other rights to contest something like this with out it being filed as a claim.

But then again  if the Veteran has credible evidence to prove no error was made  at the time a decision was granted ,then the VA should do the right thing and give the $$ back that they withheld from his/her compensation.   looks like that would be illegal anyway.

this could be solved at the DRO Level I would think.

This Veteran should have recieved a letter letting the Veteran know what his/her rights are and how they can contest this.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

VA made errors in audits of my issues that contained Many substantial errors to my detriment.

I filed a few CUEs recently on their Nehmer Audit.

We dont know what errors you believe they made-that they want to recover from your comp.But it is a Good idea for any veteran to go over any audits they get from the VA.

Fortunately in my case, NVLSP sent me the historic rate charts that go back to 1988-the rate charts at VA only go back I think to 1992.

Can you scan and post ( cover C file prior to scanning it) their denial of the waiver?

With the evidence you said they didnt consider,you might have a CUE basis.

One error I had was that they withheld my 1151 DIC until my FTCA settelement offset was paid.

I wrote to them many times to tell them ( with a copy of the settlement,) that only part of it was to be withheld..no response from the RO.

QWhen I re opened my D*IC claim for direct SC death, the Regional COunsel got the file , as he had to verify the past malpractice and he promptly filed a CUE on them.

The check came before I even got a copy of the RO's letter, 28,000 but when the letter from VA came they enclosed an audit and had missed an entire year of DIC- I sent them a letter (maybe a CUE I forget) and within 3 weeks I got the balance.

My Nehmer audit involved a grant for 2 1151 CUE claims and  the AO IHD award. and SMC.

It says right before the audit in the decision,that it is an "estimate".

If they are wrong a CUE filed now might get this resolved faster than the regular appeals process.

I figured years ago, if the regional counsel can file CUE against why cant I-within the appeals period.

I haven't lost any CUEs I filed like that yet-on that type of CUE, I always put Attention to: and than use the alphanumeric on the decision. The alpha part contains the initials of the last person who worked on the decision. 

Based on your post and the evidence you mentioned, they might have violated 38 CFR 4.6. which they violated in many decisions I have received.

I also cite  any other legal error they made.

Lots of info in our CUE forum.I call CUEs filed within the appeal period GCY CUES ( go Cue yourself VA)ad searchable here .

two or three of our members have used that tactic as well here , and got faster awards than a long appeal would take.





Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

GBA said:-

"Office of management and budget audited my account" I dont understand that-I thought  most audits are done by the VAROs.???



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0



Reason I asked is that these are two separate departments of the VA.I have no clue on what they have to do with VA claimsissues.

I googled the Office of Management and Budget and got this:


It is a department within the White House.

Can you scan and attach here ( cover personal identifying stuff prior to scanning it)

anything from VA that stated where the audit was done?



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines