Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Hypertension C&P


So had a NOD with DRO review in for hypertension and CAD.  CAD was rated at 60%, but it appears that hypertension will be rated at 0% because my diastolic readings at my C&P only averaged out to around 85.  However, this was done while medicated on two different blood pressure medications so I do not understand the rationale that VA determines their rating when they use the criteria they have for ratings;

The ratings: If the average diastolic pressure is 130 or more, then it is rated 60%. If the average diastolic pressure is 120 to 129, then it is rated 40%. If the average diastolic pressure is 110 to 119, or the average systolic pressure is 200 or more, then it is rated 20%. If the average diastolic pressure is 100 to 109, or the average systolic pressure is 160 to 199, then it is rated 10%. If the average diastolic pressure was 100 or more before fully controlled by medication and continuous medication is required to keep the blood pressure under control, then the minimum rating is 10%.

I have been on blood pressure medication since my heart attack and hypertension diagnosis in 2005 and all my vitals on record with the VA, with the exception of a few, are also while on blood pressure medication.  So there is no way they can determine what my average diastolic pressure was before being fully controlled by medication, except that continuous medication is required to keep my blood pressure under control (currently prescribed Lisinpril & Metoprolol).  Below are my BP readings since I first started being cared for by the VA.  Note that when I came to the VA, I had already been on blood pressure meds since 2005;

131 80 9/27/2018
127 74 8/15/2018
127 82 7/16/2018
139 90 6/15/2018
148 92 6/5/2018
144 83 6/5/2018
150 85 2/14/2018
144 94 1/11/2018
114 75 9/1/2017
123 83 5/4/2017
152 104 5/3/2017
131 89 10/24/2016
152 83 6/13/2016
197 120 6/12/2016
164 105 6/10/2016
145 89 6/3/2016
144 86 6/3/2016
146 95 3/3/2016
146 100 5/27/2015
142 91 10/16/2014
150 92 2/24/2014
157 96 10/7/2013
130 79 5/29/2013
121 82 1/16/2013
136 92 10/30/2012
150 86 10/30/2012
144 95 10/30/2012


You can see the instances where I was off my blood pressure medications with readings over 100 as well as most of the medicated readings being in the high 80's to mid 90's.  I am planning on requesting a reconsideration once I get my BBE for this appeal and making the argument that my diastolic would he averaging over 100, as evidenced by the instances where it has been over 100, and that absent continuous medication my blood pressure would not be fully controlled. Anyone have thoughts on this angle on reconsideration? 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It isn't enough to just argue with the VA, what a lot of guys don't understand is going in there with evidence. Such as you have laid out in a quick chart. But this evidence can't come from a lay person. The evidence needs to come from your doctor. Anyone can say I have high readings when I'm off my meds, but a letter from a doctor can come and make a much bigger difference. Basiclly, we have to prove our disability to the VA in order to make the connection. An 85 reading at the C&P is pretty low (for VA standards) when taking meds. At minimum, I would hound your doctor to get you a letter of what happens when you are off your meds (readings) and at max, request another C&P exam when off your meds. That may be dangerous for you so, that is your call. Good luck.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Pretty much, the VA does not "do requests from the Veteran for C and P exams", with few exceptions.  The VA orders a C and P exam, pretty much at their own discretion, but sometimes the Board or CAVC will order the VA to provide an exam.   If the Veteran could chose when/if/who to examine him, for benefits purposes, it would be pretty simple:  Look online and find out which examiners give evidence to award, then have VA give you a c and p exam from that examiner.  It does not work that way.  VA, because they pay for the exams, hires an examiner at their sole discretion.  

However, you can hire an IMO/IME from an examiner of your choosing, which can be sufficent to rebut a VA paid examiner.  This is precisely why most Vets who actually get benefits wind up hiring their own IMO/IME.  

Its the way the VA works.  You dont have to like it, in fact, the more Vets an examiner makes mad, the better VA likes him.  

Edited by broncovet

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

To add, you can only rebut medical evidence with medical evidence.  Lay evidence does not rebut medical evidence.  That is to say your opinion does not matter.  You need medical opinions to rebut medical opinions.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines