Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Rogue C&P Examiner?


I figured out how to access my C&P exam through the blue button and I was shocked.  I have been rated at 20% for several years with an additional 10% for radiculapothy. 

The examiner notes read as if she was examining someone other than me.  She noted no radiculapothy and also somehow measured me at 45 degrees forward flexion.  It is like she literally lied on the DBQ. I have not had 45 degrees forward flexion in years and the radiculapothy is fairly persistent. 


If I understand the ratings correctly, her findings are good enough to get my rating lowered despite being much worse off than I was when the 20% was granted. 


Do they get performance bonuses to screw people?


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0


 VHA providers often refuse to diagnose medical conditions.

i have screened positive multiple times for PTSD by VHA MH nurses.

No diagnosis of PTSD by them.

I reported ringing in my ears for years to VHA providers and no diagnose of tinnitus.

I had a spinal MRI done due to chronic back pain and three VHA doctors stated they reviewed the MRI results and all reported I had no abnormalities.

I obtained a copy of the actual radiologists report of my MRI and discovered that my pain was coming from a herniated disc pushing 1 cm into my thoracic spinal cord.

I was Baker acted by the VA in October 2017.

I had called the Veterans Crisis Line for help and they sent the cops to involuntarily institutionalize me.

Was released the next day and the vA was ringing my phone off the hook to come see their shrink.

I complied and the shrink asked me what happened and I said I had a total meltdown.

He responded that I was just having a pity party.

No more VA so-called medical care for me.


Sometimes C&P examiners will make honest mistakes, but oftentimes their DBQs ignore the facts when giving an opinion.

The raters at the regional office will afford more weight to an opinion that is against granting service connection/or an increase even when the STRs directly contradicts the rationale that the examiner used to form the unfavorable opinion against a veteran.

Don't believe in the fairy tale that a tie goes to the veteran if you have two C&P exams, one favorable and the other not favorable.

The regional office rater will find the unfavorable opinion more persuasive, and promptly render a denial.


Favorable evidence is ignored by my regional office raters, and this is especially obvious, now that I am at the precipice of obtaining TDIU or a 100% rating.


The VBA has a lot of tools in their shed that are implemented to deny benefits to veterans.

You have to get in the trenches with the VBA, and fight when they do wrong.


My fight for my benefits will go on.








  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yup, I found out a few years after a C&P that my examiner suggested 70% for PTSD and the VA did nothing. I now have a CUE in after reading that C&P exam and seeing so many errors. I also never go to VA mental health. I had one therapist that completely retraumatized me and I never went back, I pay out of pocket for someone outside the VA (I don’t think I’ll ever do mental health through the VA again).

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Well, yes.  The VA lets C and P examiners keep their job provided that they mess over you and other Veterans.  C and P exams are very lucrative..examiners get paid big bucks for doing an exam, but if they provide evidence for an award, then the VA simply stops ordering exams from that examiner anymore.  

In other words, the guy who signs your checks gets to tell you how to do your job.  C and P examiners get checks from VA so they are obligated to perform their job the way VA specifies.  This is precisely why many Vets who get benefits eventually hire their own private examiner (IMO or IME) to get benefits.  When you employ the doctor, then you can ask him to do the job in the way you like.  People have a strong tendency to do as their employer so directs, so they can keep their job.  

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

 C & P examiners are one of the biggest reason for denials.

I am waiting for a copy of the actual postumous exam that was incorporated into a denial on a 1151 claim I had pending.

After receipt of my CUE the VA reversed to an award in mere weeks- less than a month-

But the evidence list for the denial noted a VACO cardio  review in detail, that supported my FTCA case and also this specific claim. it is difficult for me to accept the C & P rendition in the denial, and I asked for a signed copy of the actual C & P and the examiner's qualifications.

There is no one in  the VA's C & P list who has the extensive expertise that this VACO doctor has.

When I get the copy of the actual C & P , I am sending it to the Secretary of the VA.

If I dont get it,. Wilkie will get what the VARO put into the denial, that it said. Maybe my RO made the whole thing up.

It is absurd that vets have to obtain IMO/IMEs that can be quiet costly in some cases, to prove their claims to the VA . However that is often the only way to succeed.

A good IMO /IME doctor will follow the IMO/IME criteria here at hadit and also point out the deficiencies in any bogus C & P exam crap you get.







  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

VA examiners are the cream of the bottom of the bowl sometimes.  I had one deny I was even disabled and say I was malingering despite years worth of evidence and a protected rating.  I had another refuse to even read an IMO from a private doctor because she had performed testing on me previously.  That said I do not believe all examiners are bad.  I have had examiners that were good for me and solidified my benefits.  I can only say that you take your chances when you walk into a C&P. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines