Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Berta

1151 claims and OGC Pres Op -08-97

Question

I have searched BVA, CAVC, and talked to a few lawyers about this-over the years, and never found anyone who challengd a 1151 decision with this regulation:

So I have done that that.

My husband was 100% P & T SC for PTSD and also 100% P & T for a Section 1151 Stroke that contributed to his death.

I have 4 separate DIC  theories of entitlement - 2 under1151 and 2 under direct SC.....my original 1151 DIC was turned into direct DIC in 2009.

The OGC Pres Op - written after the 351 moratorium I was in, ( 351 became 1151 in 1997) states in part:

 

.”  We stated that “the language and legislative history of [38 U.S.C. § 351] make clear that Congress intended that all veterans’ monetary benefits payable for service-connected disability or death be payable for qualifying disability or death resulting from, among other things, medical examination or treatment in the same manner as though the disability or death had been a result of military service.”  VAOPGCPREC 80-90, at 3 (emphasis in original).”


And:

.  In that opinion, we clarified the statement in VAOPGCPREC 80-90 that “all veterans’ monetary benefits payable for service-connected disability or death” are available for disabilities compensated under 38 U.S.C. § 351.  We explained that the statement “was generally intended to encompass all disability and death compensation and DIC benefits,” but not necessarily all other ancillary benefits available to veterans suffering from service-connected disabilities.  VAOPGCPREC 100-90, at 2-3.  We stated that “section 351 entitlement may also provide entitlement to certain ancillary and special service-connected benefits depending upon congressional intent.”  Id. at 3 (emphasis in original).”

And:
 

HELD:

 

"Disability compensation may be paid, pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1151 and 38 C.F.R. § 3.310, for disability which is proximately due to or the result of a disability for which compensation is payable under section 1151.”

https://www.va.gov/ogc/opinions/1997precedentopinions.asp

 

The word "all" is mentioned twice, underlined as emphasis in the opinion, and does not eliminate any affected veteran or their survivor who is eligible for accrued benefits.

My Nehmer decision included an award of CUE for my husband's 1151 IHD and Stroke and appeared to apply this Pres Op to the first 6 months of his 1151 disability- but he had the 1151 stroke 100% P & T for 2 years peioe to his deatgh ( and IHD msdiagnosed, Sced to AO , since 1988)-I filed CUES on all of that.

This opinion has never been withdrawn or altered in any way and was prepared by OGC the same year I settled under FTCA.

Oddly enough it is not in M21-1MR as far as I know under their 1151 info, and might be one of many OGC opinions, that veterans and their survivors never even know about.

I filed multiple CUEs a few months ago- regarding this issue and fully intend to see a positive result. The evidence is from the OGC above, but also involves a 'congressional intent'. VA had a brief statement at their web site for years which seems to have been taken down. It said under their limited 1151 info, that veterans cannot be "deprived"of their 1151 awards but I think many have been "deprived" of the intent of Congress by VA's failure to apply this established VA OGC opinion.

If VA has "combined 1151 issues with SC ratings, that to me is a deprivation of "all".

My CUEs all involve violation of 38 CFR 4.6 and they have ignored probative evidence within OGC Pres Op 08-97, and copies of the opinion were sent with each CUE.

My RO likes to lose , remove from the C file, and/or ignore probative evidence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Berta
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I smelled this coming for a while.  While I expect VA to fight you tooth and nail, it should be interesting.  It sounds like there is no prohibition from receiving both an 1151 and direct service connection, tho I dont know anyone who gets both.  

You posted:

Quote

My RO likes to lose , remove from the C file, and/or ignore probative evidence.

 

My RO must have gotten its training from your RO, as they have done all this repeatedly over the past 16 years.  As they discovered in the "october 2008 incident", it was not an "incident" but rather widespread occurance in multiple, multiple VARO's.  Its none other than fraud.  

In criminal law, its illegal to "tamper with evidence".  I have no idea how VA has gotten away with this for decades, other than having control of its own kangaroo court police force, the VAOIG.  What is a crime in most places, is a normal occurance at the VA, with Vets paying the price of delayed benefits, including homelessness and even Veteran suicide.  

Edited by broncovet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Broncovet, if the VAROs ignore our probative evidence ,with a complete violation of 38 CFR 4.6, they might as well "shred " it, if we dont keep sending it to them. (They probably still shred stuff!)

"I smelled this coming for a while.  While I expect VA to fight you tooth and nail, it should be interesting. "

I will LOVE the fight!

It sounds like there is no prohibition from receiving both an 1151 and direct service connection, tho I dont know anyone who gets both."  

I did get both but only for the 6 month 100% 1151 stroke regulations, after that they have to rate the residuals- My husband's residuals were all   100% P & T, under 1151, until he died,  but all the evidence I sent them ( I do think that evidence was shredded now) was ignored and their Director told me the 100% 1151 stroke was Total but "not Permanent". The stroke is listed in the autopsy and death certificate as a contributing factor to death. Death makes any 100% award P & T at death.I asked the director ( she called me twice to get me to believe this BS) what sudden miraulous cure VA had provided to make the stroke not Permanent.

My evidence is from a former VA Secretary, SSDI, Voc Rehab, the AO settlement Fund, and a waiver of student loan signed by a VA doctor, who checked off stroke 100% P & T and a  C & P exam done at the Bath VA, in a crowded hallway- I was present- the Neurologist gave him a few commands, looked over his MRI and stated very loudly "I declare you totally and Permanently Disabled." The other vets looked at him like he won the lottery. We already knew he was P & T. The first page of the exam is all I got from them.The neuro actually notes are 'missing.'

I reported the director to a higher authority.A Buffalo RO vet I heard from recently reported her to the IG and is following up with reporting her to the OAWB.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I do think its much harder for VA to shred our stuff now, because virtually all of it is electronically recorded.  Hopefully there are checks and balances so they cant just hit the "delete" key with no consequences.  This is a big improvement.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

If they did delete it electronically, there would be an electronic paper trail, leading back to the computer where the person who deleted it, logged in.  I dont think they want that paper trail!!!!!! With paper shredding, there is no "paper trail", the papers just diappear.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I once had the VA deny that I had never been to their hospital.  Afterward I tried to get an appointment and they denied me stating that I had missed three follow-up appointments there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Enough has been said on this topic. This forum is not the proper forum for an attorney and former client to hash out their problems. Please take this offline
    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 7 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines