Jump to content
  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Ad Free Subscription.jpgOne Time Financial Gift.jpg

    Subscriptions and Gifts are NOT Tax Deductible. HadIt.com is NOT a Non Profit.

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
MrStryker

Appeal direct service connection with secondary evidence

Question

My VSO let me know that my OSA appeal was denied.  My original claim was a direct service connection. 

I read the sleep apnea field manual from Chris Attig and appealed the decision. 

On appeal I stated the OSA should be secondary to PTSD and sinusitis. I obtained an IMO from Dr Anaise and a DBQ with the at least as likely as not and medically necessary (CPAP) statements from my psychiatrist. 

My question is on appeal can you submit evidence to make it a secondary condition or does it need to be filed as secondary from the beginning? 

I haven't received the RAMP appeal denial letter yet.  Also is there a section in the 38 CFR regarding secondary conditions with an original direct service connection claim? 

Edited by MrStryker
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

  I'm sure someone more familiar with the RAMP process will chime in, but assuming that you can submit evidence at all, (and I'm pretty sure you can, at this point) by all means you can and should address the secondary and even aggravation aspects of service connection as well as direct connection.

  The C&P examiner and rater actually should have addressed all three "prongs" of service connection from whatever you have submitted, but I can tell you that in my case, it apparently didn't happen.  The BVA pointed that out repeatedly in granting most of my appeal, stating repeatedly that the C&P examiners and rater(s) "failed to address the aggravation prong of secondary service connection".  

  If you have something that specifically supports any of these three "prongs", you definitely want them to have it.  It is my understanding that it is not supposed to hurt your claim even if you try to claim the same condition on all three prongs.   The person(s) deciding your claim or appeal is supposed to be looking for a way to grant your claim.  The evidence may be too weak for them to grant "direct", but they will then re-examine the issue from the other two aspects.  

Hopefully the opinions you want to submit explain the rationale behind the suggested nexus (I'd imagine they do, but just be sure.)  Just saying they believe the OSA is caused or aggravated by your other issues isn't good enough, there need to be explanations of why and how there's a link.  I'm pretty sure Dr. Anaise's opinion and evidence will cover that nicely, it sounds like he knows what the process needs.  Good luck getting whatever rating you deserve!

Edited by acesup
omissions
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

  • 0
17 minutes ago, acesup said:

  I'm sure someone more familiar with the RAMP process will chime in, but assuming that you can submit evidence at all, (and I'm pretty sure you can, at this point) by all means you can and should address the secondary and even aggravation aspects of service connection as well as direct connection.

  The C&P examiner and rater actually should have addressed all three "prongs" of service connection from whatever you have submitted, but I can tell you that in my case, it apparently didn't happen.  The BVA pointed that out repeatedly in granting most of my appeal, stating repeatedly that the C&P examiners and rater(s) "failed to address the aggravation prong of secondary service connection".  

  If you have something that specifically supports any of these three "prongs", you definitely want them to have it.  It is my understanding that it is not supposed to hurt your claim even if you try to claim the same condition on all three prongs.   The person(s) deciding your claim or appeal is supposed to be looking for a way to grant your claim.  The evidence may be too weak for them to grant "direct", but they will then re-examine the issue from the other two aspects.  

Hopefully the opinions you want to submit explain the rationale behind the suggested nexus (I'd imagine they do, but just be sure.)  Just saying they believe the OSA is caused or aggravated by your other issues isn't good enough, there need to be explanations of why and how there's a link.  I'm pretty sure Dr. Anaise's opinion and evidence will cover that nicely, it sounds like he knows what the process needs.  Good luck getting whatever rating you deserve!

Thanks do you know the regulation that shows that they're supposed to look at the three "prongs?"  I know with RAMP they're supposed to put the evidence used for and against.  I didn't receive a C&P Exam for my appeal.  I used the supplement track and submitted the sleep study, Dr. Anaise IMO and DBQ from my psychiatrist as well as articles connecting PTSD to OSA, and BVA decisions as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

In determining whether a prior determination involves CUE, the Court has established a three-prong test. The three prongs are: (1) either the correct facts, as they were known at the time, were not before the adjudicator (i.e., there must be more than simple disagreement on how the facts were weighed or evaluated), or the statutory/regulatory provisions extant at that time were not correctly applied; (2) the error must be 'undebatable' and of the sort which, if it had not been made, would have manifestly changed the outcome at the time it was made; and (3) a determination that there was CUE must be based on the record and law that existed at the time of the adjudication in question. Damrel v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 242, 245 (1994) (citing Russell v. Principi, 3 Vet. App. 310, 313-14 (1992) (en banc)).

 

Edited by MrStryker
Citation Fixed
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I got my RAMP decision letter for my OSA denial.  In a nutshell,

"The evidence does not show that sleep apnea is related to the service-connected condition of PTSD personal trauma, alcohol use disorder, nor is there any evidence of this disability during military service. In general, there is not a relationship of sleep apnea to post traumatic stress disorder. Sleep apnea involves the respiratory system and the airway where as PTSD is a mental condition. However, all cases are different. If you have a medical opinion from a physician stating that your sleep apnea is caused by PTSD with a reasonable rationale, please submit it and we will reconsider."

Not mentioned even on the evidence list was my IMO.  The only mention was the DBQ from my psychiatrist which gives an opinion relating PTSD and sinusitis, which are both service connected.  The IMO addresses PTSD and sinusitis.  The evidence was submitted using E-Benefits.  The legacy system doesn't allow uploads of documents but RAMP does.  I'm not sure if the rater didn't check the upload folder?  Should I do another supplemental and resubmit my IMO?  I also got an IME from Dr. Ellis that was not part of the original appeal.

Edited by MrStryker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Type 1 Diabetes recent onset!
      I was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes in September 2017 OUT OF NOWHERE.

      i am a Navy Reservist and deployed in later 2009 to mid 2010 and again later 2014 to mid 2015; had a 2 year recall between those deployments.  

      Only healthcare received since commissioning in 2008 was from the Navy and no issues EVER.

      insulin dependent and have dietary restrictions and in a non deployable status.

      VA denied initial claim due to Type 1 not showing on active duty and now appealing.

      Anyone with successful experience getting a rating with my circumstances?  I live in Upstate New York.
      • 9 replies
    • Agent Orange Kadena Afb Okinawa
      I am looking for anyone who was on Kadena AFB, Okinawa or .Chanute AFB, IL. My dad was there from Oct. 68-April 70. He has ichemic heart disease, diabetes which has resulted in the amputation of his right leg below the knee and peripheral neuropathy. We were denied in 2002 AMVETS filed a claim on his behalf for heart condition, diabetes and back problems. I refiled in December 2011 and have just received the claim statements and medical release forms. I am familiar with filling out this paper work because my husband is a combat veteran of Iraqi Freedom. I have been reading articles from the Japan times and I am a member of the Agent Orange Okinawa facebook page. Another thing that helps make my dad's case is that he was on Chanute AFB, IL and it is on the EPA Superfund list and has PCBs/Pesticides and Dioxins/Furans listed as ground and water contaminants. I welcome any advice, tips or articles that I may have missed in my own research.
        • Like
      • 15 replies
    • CBO Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028 Published Dec 2018
      CBO Options for Reducing the Deficit: 2019 to 2028 - This CBO Report has been making the news. This post includes parts relevant to veterans. Nothing has been decided as of yet and some seem very unlikely but you never know. Forewarned is Forearmed.

       

      https://www.hadit.com/cbo-options-for-reducing-the-deficit-2019-to-2028-published-dec-2018/
      • 8 replies
    • 2019 Veterans Benefits
      State Benefits, Space A and More ... https://www.hadit.com/2019-changes-to-veterans-benefits-state-and-federal/
      • 2 replies
    • Appeal granted and closed.
      My appeal was granted and closed on November 9.  I got an unofficial notification from the DAV on November 15 stating "appeal granted with an evaluation of 30%" which is great!  My question is this:  How long until I get the official notification from the va? Nothing on ebennies has updated since the appeal closed. Appeal is now in historical and just says complete and at originating va office. I understand no one knows va timelines to a tee but a general timeline would be great.  Thank you all! Hope you have a Merry Christmas!

       

      Edit:  This was my first time appealing and it was a VBA grant. 
        • Like
      • 6 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines