Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Stlr4life

Mere Speculation Comp and Pen

Question

Hello Fellow Veteran 20 year retired disabled Navy veteran, quick ?? I am going for unemployability through the VA just had my comp and Pen, I do check off all the DBQ according to the therapist , but at the end of it she said in her opinion it would be mere speculation on rather I should get unemployability or not. What’s that mean thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

This article from the Veterans Law Blog might be helpful https://www.veteranslawblog.org/veterans-disability-benefits-service-connection-cannot-be-determined-without-resort-to-speculation/

Ever Seen This Phrase Before?

Have you seen this phrase in your Rating Decision from the VA (or even in the C&P Examiner’s notes of examination:  “It is not possible to resolve the issue of etiology [medical causation] of condition X without resort to speculation.”

If you have seen this phrase, then it is quite possible that the VA has failed in its duty to assist.

From the outset, let me say that I am sympathetic to the many VA Doctors who are trying, honestly, to do the job of being a doctor. Many times, the VA puts these treating physicians in the uncomfortable position of having to play detective, not doctor.   Many of these doctors, uncomfortable with making a determination about the precise etiology of a particular condition, will simply say that they cannot know without speculation.  The problem is that the VA claims examiners latched on to this language, and started cutting and pasting it into the Ratings Decisions.

The language, originally intended by the Doctor to state that he (or she) simply didn’t have enough medical evidence to determine etiology or service-connection became a tool for the VA Claims Examiner to avoid doing their job.

In a March 2010 decision, the Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims (CAVC)said “no mas” to this kind of Rating Decision.  The BVA came to several conclusions about the “mere speculation” language in a Ratings Decision or Examiner’s Opinion:

1) When a C&P examiner concludes that service-connection cannot be determined without resort to speculation, it must be clear, from either the examiner’s statements or the decision of the BVA, that the examiner has considered “all procurable and assembled data,” by obtaining all tests and records that might reasonably illuminate the medical analysis; when the record leaves the issue in doubt, it is the BVA‘s duty to remand for further development

2)  Before the BVA may rely aVA medical examiner’s conclusion that a service-connection opinion would be speculative, the examiner must explain the basis for such an opinion or the basis must otherwise be apparent in the BVA‘s review of the evidence.

3) A medical examiner who states “no conclusion as to etiology or diagnosis can be reached without resorting to speculation” may be obligated to research medical literature; his/her conclusions as to service connection must reflect the limitations of knowledge in the medical community at large and not those of a particular examiner or doctor;

4) A VA medical examiner who states “no conclusion as to etiology or diagnosis can be reached without resorting to speculation” should clearly identify exactly what facts cannot be determined.  The CAVC stated that it must be clear in the doctor’s remarks “…whether it cannot be determined from current medical knowledge that a specific in-service injury or disease can possibly cause the claimed condition, or that the actual cause cannot be selected from multiple potential causes…”

The CAVC made it clear that every situation where this language appears in a C&P Examiner notes or a Ratings Decision is not going to result in a finding that the opinion is inadequate. But, when the author used this phrase to “lazy” himself or herself out of writing a well-reasoned decision based on all of the evidence that should be available, considering the knowledge of the medical community at large, and most importantly, articulating that it did so, it is quite likely that this phrase alone might suffice to get your VA claim for disability benefits remanding back to the BVA or the VA Regional Office to supply additional medical evidence or opinions.

The Attig Law Firm represents U.S. Veterans who have been denied  benefits in their VA Disability claims for compensation due to injuries or diseases incurred during military service. The Firm currently represents peace-time and war-time veterans of all branches of the military, at all levels of the VA disability claim process (VA Regional OfficeBoard of Veterans’ Appeals, and the Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims). Contact the Attig Law Firm if you would like to discuss your claim for disability benefits before the VA.

No post on this website is meant to be legal advice and the posts on this website do not serve as a substitute for legal advice. Information is power, and we are providing this information to give you, the Veteran, some power. This information is not widely or easily accessible to Veterans.  The information presented on this website is a general description of law and processes; each case is different, and there may be approaches listed here that are not accurate or applicable to your case. Likewise, their may be information that is applicable to your case that is not provided on this Veterans Disability Compensation Blog.

It is very important that we note that each and every Veteran’s claim is different. Just because we were able to secure substantial past-due benefits for one Veteran does not mean or imply that we will be able to do so for you.   In some cases, we may not be able to secure you any financial compensation due to the facts of your particular case.

It is best to consult with a lawyer familiar with VA Disability claims to examine your particular case.  If you would like to discuss your VA claim with a lawyer who handles VA Benefits and Disability Appealscontact the Attig Law Firm, PLLC, for a free consultation with a VA Disability attorney.

VA Disability attorneys at the Attig Law Firm, PLLC, represent Veterans in their  VA Disability Claims not only in Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, but in VA Disability Claims all around the United States, Puerto Rico, and even overseas Veterans in their claims for disability compensation from the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Yep.  What Tbird said. (From Chris Attig).  

I will try to summarize.  

You wont be getting tdiu with that "lack of" a doctors opinion on your etiology.  You need a more specific opinion.  That is, a doc needs to say its at least as likely as not you are unable to work due to sc conditions.  

If you get that statement, from a doctor, then you are good to go.  However, if you dont have a definate opinion ("without resorting to speculation"), then you can spend consiberable time on the remand hamster wheel.  You choose which.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Well my ??? Why would the VA take a mere speculation opinion as a denial?? My opinion either the should get the veteran another comp and pen or approve it based of uncertainty... it’s not the veterans fault that the comp and pen doctor can’t come up with a decision?? Am I wrong ??Thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Posted (edited)

I agree with broncovet

as to why the VA won't take mere ''speculation'' is were not medical professionals  *(specialized Dr's)

  After a qualified Dr examines you and reads pertinent medical records   it is then he/she can give a professional medical opinion  and as broncovet mention above

''That is, a doc needs to say its at least as likely as not you are unable to work due to sc conditions. '' 

also you mention

it’s not the veterans fault that the comp and pen doctor can’t come up with a decision?? Am I wrong ??Thanks 

C&P Examiners are trained to give a C&P Exam and WRITE a report on their findings  from medical records and by asking the veteran questions.

  in this report he/she will write what he finds and then send this report to the VA (raters) VA Reginol Office,   its the rater who makes the decision based off the C&P MEDICAL REPORT.

C&P Examiners do not make the decision but play a very important roll  so-to -speak In the Rater decision

Then when the Veteran gets the decision  he as an option he can select if he disagrees with the decision? FILE A Notice of Disagrement within one year of the decision  or wait for the SOC and file I9 to the BVA (assuming a denial)

This is why C&P Exams are very important to veterans.

Edited by Buck52

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I have never filed for TDUI and the DBQ for it, but wouldn't the C&P person need to render and opinion based on the facts they have received?  IE:  if you checked all the boxes for UI would the facts not require the C&P to go off of what they have in front of them?

I am a bit confused.  I am assuming you asked the C&P person if you would get UI?  If so they will never tell you yes or no.  This would be an admission you could come back and say but this C&P person said I would get it.  I know they have been very hesitant to say what their option is in front of the vet.  So if this is the case I would not read too much into until you see what the final result is.  

Remember they are told to not give out any information past what is already in your file and defiantly not to give the vet a "You sure do check all the boxes so I am sure you will get UI".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • I filed a claim in october of 2018 for ptsd and TDIU, long story short I tried to do everything myself and didn't have the proper diagnosis so I was service connected for anxiety based on having a medical marijuana card diagnosis for anxiety but the rating was 30% and I much worse off then that. So I obtained a referral from the va to a fancy psychiatrist from the university of north florida's behavior health department and was diagnosed with ptsd, bi polar 1 and panic disorder. I used this new medical evidence as my supplemental claim evidence and filed it April 16, 2019 after receiving my letter March 20, 2019. My claim is now at Pending Decision Approval with an estimated completion date of july 2, 2019 which is super fast from all I have read. My question is, Am I going to be awarded tdiu with the evidence I submitted if they adjust me up to 70% which I think it will . Or if they award 70% for ptsd on this new supplemental claim will i have to re-apply for tdiu again? Or would that all be considered in the final review of the entire claim? Thanks for any help.

      1-22 1BCT 4th I.D. "Regulars by God"
      • 2 replies
    • how do you figure when they will start paying me at the 100% rate, housebound..?  They will start the pay before they finish the back pay?  That would be nice !!
    • Hello:

      If you receive a hysterectomy while you are filing for disability through the VA, will it still count?

      I am out of the military.

      Thank you
      • 1 reply
    • Help needed bad  Male MST
      Is there anything for a man who's been diagnosed with PTSD secondary to MST. I see all this information and it's primarily speaking as if it only happened to females. If anybody has any advice for a man who suffers from this condition please let me know I'm not alone. Also let me know of any coping skills you've learned as I have lived the last 25-30 years of my life in full flight from reality. 
      • 9 replies
    • Occasionally it becomes necessary for HadIt.com to come to the community to help raise funds. This is one of those occasions.

      A couple of things to keep in mind

      Financial contributions are never required, but always appreciated.


      NOT tax deductible, HadIt.com is NOT a non profit and any contribution you make is just a gift and cannot be deducted on your taxes.


      If you prefer to give through a subscription, you may subscribe here the rates are $5 per month or $50 per year and gives you an ad free experience on the forums.



      Thank you for your support!
      • 3 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines