Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
veteran

1151 claim or service connected in need of help

Question

       am trying to prepare a 1151 claim for my father in 2011 he underwent a C3 to C5 laminectomy with C3 to C6 fusion for cervical stenosis starting in 2013 we notice he was slightly forwardly bent over, and difficulty walking as well as difficulty standing up right. 2015 he was diagnosis with KYPHOSIS and walks with the aid of a rolling walker  limited mobility he sign an informed consent. and the VA is not at fault. and the conditions stated are mention in the consent form, today he is severely   forwardly bent over, difficulty standing up right, with limited mobility walking with aid of a rolling walker. how can I argue a winning chance . 

       the service connected option was my father was a telephone installer / repairer in the army 1952 to 1954 he had fell twice on his back from climbing poles. from a height lesser then 6 feet in the military. however his records whwre burn in the 1973 fire. and his dd 214 has him listed as a heavy truck driver which route should I take  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Section 1151 claims only involve proven negligence or malpractice by a VA health care provider, enough negligence or malpractice to cause additional disability rated at least at 10%.

   "the service connected option was my father was a telephone installer / repairer in the army 1952 to 1954 he had fell twice on his back from climbing poles. from a height lesser then 6 feet in the military. however his records whwre burn in the 1973 fire. and his dd 214 has him listed as a heavy truck driver which route should I take "

I feel you could certainly help him file a SC claim as I assume he has no service connected disability now-

The VA will often say the veteran's records were lost in the St Louis fire- but sometimes that is not true.

He can request his inservice medical records and personnel records at  :

https://www.archives.gov/

The site will have a blank SF 180 he can fill out. and, unless this has changed, he also will need to print off a bar coded thing, sign it, copy it for his records, and mail it to the address the form directs him too.

It is always possible that the VA 'burned in St Louis fire" stuff is BS.

He will need proof of an inservice nexus, such as the pole accidents to prove that he was injured in service this way and then he will need to prove that his current KYPHOSIS is directly due to a SC disability.

This will not be easy because kyphosis can have many causes.

https://www.va.gov/vetapp13/files3/1321099.txt

This shows how the VA can deny these claims.

Here is a successful claim.

"Subsequently, in November 2014, a Decision Review Officer (DRO) granted service connection for Scheuermann's kyphosis of dorsolumbar spine, effective April 29, 2014. The Veteran appealed for an earlier effective date. It appears the DRO set the effective date based on receipt of the evidence found sufficient to reopen the claim. Presumably this was considered the date entitlement arose under the regulation. However, regardless of when that evidence was received, it is considered submitted in conjunction with the reopened claim of February 4, 2011. 38 C.F.R. § 3.156(a). As the low back disability has been extant for many years, it is the receipt of the reopened claim which is the later here, and therefore an earlier effective date of service connection of February 4, 2011, is warranted. As is noted above, the Veteran has filed a claim for CUE in the earliest 1988 and 1990 denials of service connection for his low back disability. Those claims are referred to the RO, and are not intertwined with the Board’s determination here. Bilateral Hearing Loss Disability, and Tinnitus "

https://www.va.gov/vetapp18/files12/18157484.txt

But the best thing you can do is to have him get his inservice records and if they cannot be found and they were in the Fire, the VA has an enhanced duty to assist him. Still kyphosis can have many causes- spinal injuries being one of them and I feel he is going to need an IMO/IME at some point.

You might have to prove the stenosis was due to the falls, which in turn caused the kyphosis.

Did the VA do the surgery?

 

Edited by Berta

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Ms berta

even though ''he sign an informed consent.''

would this hinder the claim in anyway???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I've notice this lately  they always ask  veterans to sign a informed consent.' 

for any surgical procedure   even ingrown toenails or tooth extraction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

It all depends on the facts of the claim.

"ORDER Entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for damage to the colon (to include perforation of the bowel, the need for surgical resection of the large intestine / hemicolectomy, and associated deconditioning / weight loss) is granted. Entitlement to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for respiratory disability (recurrent pneumonia/empyema, the need for ventilator tracheostomy, and severe respiratory compromise with neuromuscular debilitation) is granted."


The veterans was inadequately informed of the consent and the results of the procedure were not reasonably foreseeable.

“As the Board concludes that the Veteran has shown that the procedure was furnished without the adequate informed consent contemplated by 38 C.F.R. § 3.361(d)(1)(ii) and 38 C.F.R. § 17.32(c), the Board must accordingly conclude that the fourth element of a successful § 1151 claim, i.e., whether the treatment provided by VA involved fault by VA or an event not reasonably foreseeable, is reasonably established in this case on the basis of the lack of adequate informed consent. See 38 C.F.R. § 3.361(d)(1)(ii).”

https://www.va.gov/vetapp16/files4/1626596.txt

I imagine all vets would consent to any VA or private doctor's procedure or surgery-but none of them would expect results that are definitely malpractice.

In the member's case here, this will be a difficult claim to prove service connection for- and only his stack of VA medical records would reveal if malpractice did occur.

This case is one of many- veteran do consent to procedures and surgeries and yet the VA can still be held liable for Negligence/malpractice:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/10/11/va-conceals-shoddy-care-and-health-workers-mistakes/739852001/

 

 

 

 

 



 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      doc00580220191213082945.pdf
      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
        • Like
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines