Jump to content
VA Disability Community via Hadit.com

 Click To Ask Your VA Claims Question 

 Click To Read Current Posts  

  Read Disability Claims Articles 
View All Forums | Chats and Other Events | Donate | Blogs | New Users |  Search  | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024-2.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

FDC 4 TDIU is C&P exam necessary

Rate this question


Amazing Becky

Question

The Baltimore RO received my IU claim on 04/30/2019. It’s is an FDC and includes a DBQ from my therapist. Will I still need a c&p exam?The last one was done in 2016 and it was brutal. I’m hoping to avoid a repeat. Right now my claim is in Initial review. Has anyone had a claim that jumped from the Initial Review to Prep for Decision approval and how long did the whole process take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0
6 hours ago, Amazing Becky said:

evidence from my initial claim of being unemployable.

@Amazing Becky

Okay when the letter arrives, and you scan it one or two times. Enjoy what you see. Put it down. Whoop it up for a while.

Then pick up the letter and begin a thorough review of EVERY page including the stuff that looks like boiler plate stuff, like the NOD form and instructions. Read each line by line, slowly. Take notes.

One of the first things you need to scrutinize is the list of evidence. Make sure everything YOU submitted is on that list. Make sure YOU have a copy of everything else they say they reviewed. I assume you have your C-file.

I also assume that you have requested your C-file again. If you just want all the docs in your file since the last production then ask for every file entered since the date of the NEWEST file in your existing copy of the C-file. Make sure you specify to include a demand for all files related to your health care, notes, letters requesting C&P exams, Letters requesting any other files from any other agency, business, or person, your DBQ's and the CODESHEET. Also make sure to ask for the proof of mailings and submissions.

Your VSO can also do this and in a fair world would know to get you everything.

you need every file, including SSA and IRS data they got on you.

They should have an explanation for every item you requested or was reviewed. Any item not listed that should be listed needs to be questioned, CUE'd or NOD'ed.

7 hours ago, Amazing Becky said:

However, I did try to work between 2017-2018. I was fired from my last job with the federal government...didn’t even last six months.

that is actually good evidence in favor of TDIU since you are SC for PTSD it fits right into the diagnostic codes for 70 and 100 percent ratings. The other things i mentioned above will tell you how to structure your response, including if it is that they erred by not making you 100% Schedular for PTSD.

The VA has a duty to maximize the award, so if they did grant TDIU and upped you to 70%, scrutinize the files to understand why. Look for deficiencies in the reasoning they supply. Did they not look at a piece of evidence? did they make a flat out statement with no supporting evidence? both are reasons to fight back over both the 100% Schedular and TDIU ratings they should have approved.  Did they mischaracterize your employment history? minimize that you got fired and have not regularly worked for many years? This is why they contact SSA and find out how many employers you have had, how many work gaps etc is all calculable from the SSA record. Same with IRS data sheets on taxpayers.

You don't say when your initial rating occurred and what it's percentage was. You also only show PTSD in your profile.

Are you rated for anything else? do you have any other conditions that are secondary to PTSD? for example in men ED is a common secondary for PTSD, unless there is anatomical damage it is usually rated as 0% with an SMC (K) award adding $100 bucks or so a month. There is a female equivalent, I just don't know what it is called. This is a self-reported condition and unless deformity is claimed, no physical exam is involved for men. I am not sure for women. Damage to our reproductive systems is compensable, and there are many conditions that PTSD will aggravate or cause.

There are also Genitorurinary secondaries to PTSD for men and women. I just found this out myself in a 2018 decision and have recently put in for Voiding Dysfunction per the VA decision letter. At max under the rating codes it is a 60% rating, which would put me at a total of 170% assuming they deny my other recent submissions. If they were not all listed as secondary to my PTSD I would be in SMC (s) territory.

Even if the Voiding dysfunction is just rated as SMC it would be K which is another 100 a month. If they do that I will NOD the heck out of them.

The point is look for secondaries to your rated SC condition, even if they are NSC conditions that are aggravated by the SC condition you can get compensation for them.

You don't say what years your were in, what your job was, or where you were stationed/deployed to.

Some jobs and locations it is all but a given you will have a hearing issue like Tinnitus or Bilateral Hearing loss.

Tinnitus is a phantom noise with no visible problem in the ear canal. There is no proven cause, but the medical literature favors the concept that your brain is expecting your ears to funnel noise to be deciphered. When there is no noise for periods of time the brain "creates" the noise to offset what it considers a void. Either way, ringing in your ears is common, sometimes it is testable when a physical problem can be detected like a bad ear canal from TBI or a blast going off near your head. If your ear gets ripped off in a blast you likely have tinnitus. If you have it file for it. It is compensable at 10%

If you were in a noisy job, combat or a combat area, look through your C-file for every military hearing test. compare the numbers from each one to the next from Day 1 in the service to your last day in the service. Look for a page that says either OSHA STR or "baseline rest" (or words similar) on one or more of the hearing tests. There is a checkbox on most of the forms if they find an in service significant threshold change of 20db or more. That makes an in-service medical record of your hearing loss. Your job or location is the nexus, and of course a hearing test will be the current disability. VA hates rating for hearing, but get it SC'd now. it is harder to do later on. Most get a 0% but as you age and become deaf that can mean more money. plan ahead.

I hope my suggestions are helpful to you, and please let us know what happens.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

@GeekySquid

This is the timeline for my PTSD claim.

May 2016 submitted claim for PTSD

December 2016 claim denied

January 2017 filed NOD DRO review

July 2018 DRO found error and granted claim

February 2019 received BBE

April 2019 filed for increase/IU

May 06, 2019 claim in the initial review stage

I do not have any other disabilities claimed. I do have high blood pressure which my c&p examiner noted was most likely do to PTSD.

I’m also awaiting results to see if I have sleep apnea. How do I get a copy of my c-file? My VSO took some paperwork from my first claim and included it in this one. However, I don’t know everything she submitted other than what I ha e her. When I received my letter in the mail back in February I noticed something kinda strange. I was actually rated at 100% for the first 5 months (June 2016-October 2016) based upon the DBQ I submitted with my claim from my therapist. My c&p exam was done in November 2016 and based on the results was lowered to 70%. Do you think the fact that I originally had 100% helps my claim?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

That is an interesting timeline, especially that you were 100% PTSD and then reduced.  They are not supposed to develop negative evidence from a C&P to reverse an earlier decision, but we know that the VA is an animal that forces you to follow the law but does not always follow the laws.  You can request your records by visiting your VSO or online on ebenefits.  I would keep fighting this including going to the BVA if necessary.

Edited by vetquest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
50 minutes ago, Amazing Becky said:

I do have high blood pressure which my c&p examiner noted was most likely do to PTSD.

@Amazing Becky

Ding Ding Ding Ding! you may have a claim for Hypertension secondary to PTSD.

Do you have that DBQ? can you scan it in and upload? (COVER YOUR IDENTIFYING INFO! We like you but we don't want you to accidentally reveal your personal details like SSN or address. )

What is necessary in it are the selections of the Magic Words "...More Likely than NOT..."

Have you been treated for the High Blood Pressure? if not WHY?

There are three parts to proving Service Connection called the Caluza Triangle. Each condition must have a medical diagnosis, a nexus and an in service event or aggravation.

Read about it here https://www.hadit.com/caluza-triangle-defines-necessary-service-connection/

In the case of a Secondary Condition, the primary it is under provides the nexus leg of the triangle but you still need the diagnosis and some indication that it started AFTER the harm. In the case of PTSD whatever the Stressor events were look to see if your BP has been consistently higher than it was before. Now there is also a caveat. If you already had documented High BP and after the events it got higher, that will satisfy too as any SC that aggravates an NSC is compensable as SC based on the level indicated in the rating table. The condition must be chronic and you currently (meaning today) suffer from it.

As for getting your C-File, strike one against your VSO! They should ALL tell every veteran to get their C-file as they should know we NEED it to become our own best advocate!!!!!!

https://www.hadit.com/requesting-your-va-c-file/

There are links on VA.gov to file for it electronically. The last one I got in 2018 came on a CDROM and took about 60 days. The first one I ordered in 2012 took 4 years and came as a box of papers out of no where. Long story and I type too much already.

Do not pass go! Do not collect $100! order your C-file ASAP! TODAY! NOT TOMORROW!... have I stressed that enough?

It is not like downloading an e-book or video. The folks have to collect, review, and assemble the stuff to burn to CDROM, and it is on a first come first served basis. Since you are a relatively recent veteran (that is when compared to some old folks like me) your files may already be fully electronic which speeds stuff up. They claim everyone's files are too be fully converted but as far as I know that project is not yet complete.

When you get it, there are tons of posts here on how to use it and  what to look for. In the meantime I would get a PDF manipulation program that allows you to Index, Edit and Make PDF's Searchable. I would also begin stocking up on printer ink, a case of paper and a couple of three ring binders, and a hole punch. Get some post it notes. If you don't already have one, consider investing in a printer /scanner /fax combo machine. as the most environmentally friendly thing to do related to organizing your C-File.

Make sure you copy the contents to your computer, put another copy in your on line Cloud like Drop Box or Windows Drive and then put a third copy on whatever place your back your computer up to. Then take the CDROM and put it in your Safe Deposit Box or fireproof metal lock box at home.

it is long, boring and not really in any order except theoretically newest to oldest.

50 minutes ago, Amazing Becky said:

When I received my letter in the mail back in February I noticed something kinda strange. I was actually rated at 100% for the first 5 months (June 2016-October 2016) based upon the DBQ I submitted with my claim from my therapist. My c&p exam was done in November 2016 and based on the results was lowered to 70%. Do you think the fact that I originally had 100% helps my claim?

That is an interesting occurrence and I want to make sure what you mean.

Are you saying the non-VA Doc who did the DBQ marked it as you meeting the criteria for 100% and the C&P Doc dropped you to 70%? (if this is the situation YOU have a case! ding ding ding. in cases where medical opinions differ you are likely in equipose, and in that case the TIE goes to the Veteran)

or are you saying that somehow the VA itself rated you at 100% and then dropped it to 70%? (you also have a case here, it is just a different one!)

Those are two different things.

Info you should know. The C&P Doctor does not "rate" you for anything in terms of VA Decisions. it is a misnomer we all use. If your therapy doc filled out the DBQ and checked that your condition most closely resembled the 100% criteria, that is not a rating in terms of compensation. They don't "award" anything.

The Docs at the C&P are not the folks that decide what your "rating award " is. They are only offering a medical opinion that your condition most closely supports the line in the rating schedule which gives a certain %.

Now if you have a VA Decision Letter that says the Amazing Becky is Rated 100% for SC PTSD and then the VA lowered it, you have a case. It takes a lot for the VA to lower a rate, even a new one, and they have to document the hell out of it to survive the BVA.

Let us know what is going on and upload those things as soon as you can so we can offer suggestions based on the facts.

 

Edited by GeekySquid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Thanks for the advice about the c-file. I’ll ask my VSO if she can give it to me or I’ll go online and get it myself. I went back thru the c&p exam and the examiner stated, “ She is taking high blood pressure medication as it’s typically high secondary to stress”. I developed high blood pressure in 2015. I did not have it before then. After going through my personnel file the VA found markers at the end of military career which showed signs of my having ptsd. The Army put me out of the military with a honorable discharge due to my change in behavior. Which to me is another sign of not being able to work. At the time the original ptsd claim was submitted, my theory worked for the VA. The DBQ she submitted back then met the criteria for 100% scheduler according to the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
1 minute ago, Amazing Becky said:

I went back thru the c&p exam and the examiner stated,

@Amazing Becky

which Doctor? civilian? VA doc? C&P examiner? sadly it is important to know which made that claim and which DBQ you are talking about.

2 minutes ago, Amazing Becky said:

She is taking high blood pressure medication as it’s typically high secondary to stress”.

The importance of this depends on the the previous question. either way it should "help" a secondary claim.

3 minutes ago, Amazing Becky said:

Which to me is another sign of not being able to work.

when you get your C-file, look at your evals, notes, comments etc after the stressor dates. You need to see how they characterized your decline in the Military record and Discharge orders.

 

5 minutes ago, Amazing Becky said:

The DBQ she submitted back then met the criteria for 100% scheduler according to the VA.

who is "she"? is she a private doc or a VA doc or a C&P doc? they are different things. Only a specifically trained and designated VA C&P doctor is qualified to do make a determination on PTSD. The same applies to MST. It is in the regs and they are two of the very few claims that are restricted to VA C&P certified and employed doctors.

When you say "according to the VA" what form and who in the VA said that?

I am not trying to be difficult, it is just important to make sure all the pieces are in place correctly.

There is no VA-to-Human dictionary and that means us mere humans use words and phrases we think make sense but are gibberish in terms of VA-speak.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use