Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sign in to follow this  

S 2694

Recommended Posts


Halfway down ----

I hope they will have access to Public comment before this gets into 38 CFR-

"(g) Effective Date-

(1) IN GENERAL- The amendments made by this section shall take effect six months after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(2) REGULATIONS- The Secretary shall prescribe the regulations, if any, to be prescribed under the amendments made by subsection (a) not later than the date specified in paragraph (1).

(3) CLAIMS- The amendments made by subsections (:huh:, ©, (d), and (e) shall apply to claims submitted on or after the date specified in paragraph (1)"

Question- only applicable to claims filed on or after the date the regs begin??????

that would put many vets with current claims and the desire for legal representation right into the crapper-

This part bothers me too---

`"(2) The Secretary may prescribe in regulations qualifications and standards of conduct for individuals recognized under this section, including a requirement that, before being recognized, an individual--

`(A) show that such individual is of good moral character and in good repute, is qualified to render claimants valuable service, and is otherwise competent to assist claimants in presenting claims;

`(:lol: has such level of experience and specialized training as the Secretary shall specify; and

`© certifies to the Secretary that the individual has satisfied any qualifications and standards prescribed by the Secretary under this section"

In essense could the VA say that an attorney who might prepare a brief or whatever to support the vet's claim might have-per the VA -not enough experience ,competency, or rationale?

They sure try to knock us down when we try to supply medical evidence saying we are not competent to do that-

This gets me :

`(A) show that such individual is of good moral character and in good repute, is qualified to render claimants valuable service, and is otherwise competent to assist claimants in presenting claims;

Good moral character and good repute- I have no doubts that this exemplifies everyone employed at the VAROs

But the rest of this statement-

heck if we had that from the VA we would not need lawyers.

It is almost like the lawyers will have to have a higher standard of ability than the RO employees!

Abut 2-3 years ago the VA published a new reg and did not allow the public to have any inout into it- I forget what reg this was-----

there was quite a bit of hoopla from the vet orgs.

In this case if public comment is allowed (and I think it is a matter of law that it is allowed) I bet the DAV and other paid vet orgs will sure comment against the reg-

veterans should be quick to file a comment if they can-and it goes usually into the fed register

or is reffered to in some way.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

What gets me here Terry is that they appear to be discriminating against veterans who have claims already filed and who need real legal representation yet this applies only to claims filed on or after the regs go through ?

So no one here -with a claim already filed- can benefit from this reg?

I thought -when this news first came out -the regs would involve all claims that had been denied and for which a NOD had already been filed and these would hold the right for the vet to hire an attorney.

I wonder if there are vets out there holding back from filing for the official reg date-so they can file via an attorney-

but they loose a better EED if they do that.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Any one heard of this , I filed a claim for this secondary to hypertension, I had a echo cardiogram, that stated the diagnosis was this heart disease. my question is what is the rating for this. attached is the Echo.

      • 7 replies
    • Need your support - T-shirts Available - Please buy a mug or a membership
      if you have been thinking about subscribing to an ad-free forum or buying a mug now would a very helpful time to do that.

      Thank you for your support
      • 18 replies
    • OK everyone thanks for all the advice I need your help I called VSO complained about length of time on Wednesday of this week today I checked my E benefits and my ratings are in for my ankles that they were denying me 10% for each bilateral which makes 21% I was originally 80% now they’re still saying I’m 80% 

      I’m 50% pes planus 30% migraine headaches 20% lumbar 10% tinnitus and now bilateral 21% so 10% left and right ankle Can someone else please do the math because I come up with 86% which makes me 90 what am I missing please help and thank you
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines