Jump to content

  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Would I qualify for SMC-S / housebound?


After my heart attack in early April I have brain fog and am trying to determine if I qualify for SMC-S or housebound. I'm 100% P&T for 10+ years and filed a claim for heart attack at the beginning of May. I am not medically cleared to return to work yet.

Bilateral ratings
20%, 20%, 10%, 10% = 48%

Single ratings
40%, 30%, 30%, 30%, 20%, 10%,  10%,  10%,  10%

Factoring in the bilateral and singles, I calculate 96%

I also have a separate single rating of 60%

I looked up SMC-S laws and found:


38 U.S. Code § 1114. Rates of wartime disability compensation
(s) If the veteran has a service-connected disability rated as total, and
(1) has additional service-connected disability or disabilities independently ratable at 60 percent or more, or,
(2) by reason of such veteran’s service-connected disability or disabilities, is permanently housebound, then the monthly compensation shall be $2,993.

For the purpose of this subsection, the requirement of “permanently housebound” will be considered to have been met when the veteran is substantially confined to such veteran’s house (ward or clinical areas, if institutionalized) or immediate premises due to a service-connected disability or disabilities which it is reasonably certain will remain throughout such veteran’s lifetime.


Would I qualify?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Short answer:  We dont know.

There are 2 ways to qualify for SMC S.  You probably dont qualify for statuatory SMC S, UNLESS you have a "single" 100 percent disability.  You can check with the M21 on that, but that is the way I read it.  A combined 100 percent does not qualify.  

However, you may qualify for "housebound in fact" if one or more of your doctors opines you either have agarophobia (fear of leaving your home) OR you are "substantially confined" to your home to SC condition(s).  


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 6/5/2019 at 5:11 PM, Vync said:

I am not medically cleared to return to work yet.

Do you work from home? If not I would think you would not qualify for SMCs for housebound. JMO

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
On 6/5/2019 at 2:11 PM, Vync said:

I'm 100% P&T

What is this rating for and is the other 60% rating a secondary to this rating?

I take it you are not TDIU.

Broncovet is right, there has to be one distinct rating for 100% P&T AND a separate 60% rating that is not secondary to the 100% rating. Say you have a 100% PTSD rating AND a secondary of Sleep Apnea at 100%. You would not be statutory SMC(s).

But if the SA was from a different nexus you would be statutory SMC (s).

if your 60% (or more) rating is a combined rating, none of the parts can be secondary to the 100% rating.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


Just my opinion here

If you have a  100% with combined ratings at 96%  =100%  (Total)

Then you filed another claim  and was awarded 60% on a separate condition   even if this was a secondary to another s.c. condition and recieved the 60%

you  should have recieved the SMC H.B. back then.

so you need to reopen this 60% claim for the correct EED.& Re quest the SMC  H.B.in fact'' be awarded   back to the date you was awarded the 60% state the CFR's above that you posted.

And if you can get a Qualified Dr 's Opine about your heart condition as  ''it will not improve in your life time and is chronic and  or of nature   then add this to your reopen claim as further evidence for the SMC H.B.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0


    Sorry, no.  Statuatory housebound is very specific and requires a "single" 100 percent rating.  Ratings combining to 100 percent do not suffice for statuatory housebound.  

Source:  M21 Mr:


IV.ii.2.H.10.b.  Defining a Single Disability for Housebound Purposes

A single disability evaluated as 100-percent disabling under a schedular evaluation is generally a prerequisite for entitlement to housebound benefits. 
Exception A total disability evaluation based on IU, which is in turn awarded based on one disability, satisfies the regulatory requirement of “a single SC disability rated as 100 percent” for the purposes of awarding SMC housebound benefits under 38 CFR 3.350(i).
Important:  A total rating based on IU when awarded for multiple disorders treated as one disability under the five options listed in 38 CFR 4.16(a) does not satisfy the regulatory requirement under 38 CFR 3.350(i) of, “a single SC disability rated as 100 percent.”
Example – IU award based on a single disability:  A Veteran is in receipt of IU based solely on depression evaluated as 70-percent disabling.  Subsequently SC is granted for coronary artery disease (CAD) and a 60-percent evaluation is assigned.  SMC (s) at the statutory housebound rate is awarded.
Analysis:  The Veteran in this instance would be entitled to the statutory SMC housebound rate. Under Bradley v. Peake, 22 Vet.App. 280 (2008), awarding IU based on the single disability of depression is a single disability evaluated as 100-percent disabling for purposes of SMC (s) entitlement.  CAD is an additional disability evaluated as at least 60-percent disabling.
Example – IU award based on multiple disabilities:  A Veteran is in receipt of IU based on two SC disabilities:– ankylosis of the right shoulder evaluated as 50-percent disabling and residuals of a left radius fracture evaluated as 20-percent disabling.  Both disabilities are due to a motor vehicle accident (MVA) that happened during the Veteran’s active duty service.  He is awarded IU based on the disabilities caused by the MVA.  The Veteran’s separate issue of CAD is later SC and evaluated as 60-percent disabling.  The CAD, by itself, does not render the Veteran unemployable.  SMC (s) at the statutory housebound rate is not awarded.
Analysis:  The Veteran in this instance would not be entitled to SMC at the statutory housebound rate.  There is no single disability evaluated as totally disabling for the purposes of entitlement to SMC.  Although the evaluations for the MVA injuries to the shoulder and left radius are considered to be a single disability for purposes of IU entitlement, they do not represent a single disability evaluated at 100-percent disabling for purpose of awarding SMC at the statutory housebound rate.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Enough has been said on this topic. This forum is not the proper forum for an attorney and former client to hash out their problems. Please take this offline
    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 7 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:

      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis

      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.

      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 


      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.


      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

        • Like
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines