Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Standard Does The Va Use To Determine Evidence

Rate this question


mountain tyme

Question

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

http://www.warms.vba.va.gov/admin21/m21_1/...4/ch04_sech.doc

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma

Introduction This topic contains information about evaluating evidence in claims based on personal trauma, including

• evidence of personal trauma

• alternative evidence of in-service personal trauma

• evidence of behavioral changes in personal trauma cases

• development requirements for secondary evidence

• interpretation of secondary evidence, and

• obtaining evidence.

Change Date August 1, 2006

a. Evidence of Personal Trauma Personal trauma is an event of human design that threatens or inflicts harm, such as

• rape

• physical assault

• domestic battering

• robbery and mugging

• stalking, and

• harassment.

b. Alternative Evidence of In-Service Personal Trauma If the military record contains no documentation that personal trauma, including in-service sexual assault, occurred, alternative evidence might still establish an in-service stressful incident.

Sources of such evidence include

• a rape crisis center or center for domestic abuse

• a counseling facility or health clinic

• family members or roommates

• a faculty member

• civilian police reports

• medical reports from civilian physicians or caregivers who treated the veteran immediately or sometime later

• a chaplain or clergy

• fellow service persons, and

• personal diaries or journals.

Continued on next page

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma, Continued

c. Evaluating the Available Evidence Rating Veterans Service Representatives (RVSRs) must carefully evaluate all of the available evidence.

If the military records contain no documentation that personal trauma occurred, consider secondary evidence, such as

• lay statements

 indicating increased use or abuse of leave without an apparent reason, such as family obligations or family illness, or

 describing episodes of depression, panic attacks, or anxiety, but no identifiable reasons for the episodes, and

• evidence of behavioral changes that occurred around the time of the incident, including

 visits to a medical or counseling clinic or dispensary without a specific diagnosis or specific ailment

 use of pregnancy tests or tests for sexually-transmitted diseases around the time of the incident

 sudden requests that the veteran’s military occupational series or duty assignment be changed without other justification

 changes in performance and performance evaluations

 increased or decreased use of prescription medications

 increased use of over-the-counter medications

 evidence of substance abuse, such as alcohol or drugs

 increased disregard for military or civilian authority

 obsessive behavior such as overeating or undereating

 increased interest in tests for HIV or sexually transmitted diseases

 unexplained economic or social behavior changes

 treatment for physical injuries around the time of the claimed trauma, but not reported as a result of the trauma, and/or

 the breakup of a primary relationship.

Notes:

• Secondary evidence may need interpretation by a clinician in personal trauma claims, especially if the claim involves behavior changes.

• Evidence that documents behavior changes may require interpretation in relation to the medical diagnosis by a neuropsychiatric physician.

Important: When preparing letters of notification or rating decisions in personal trauma cases, use a tone that conveys sensitivity and compassion, regardless of whether the claim is granted or denied.

Continued on next page

30. Evaluating Evidence in Claims Based on Personal Trauma, Continued

d. Development Requirements for Secondary Evidence Do not deny a PTSD claim that is based on in-service personal trauma without first advising the claimant that evidence from sources other than service medical records (SMRs), such as evidence of behavioral changes, may constitute credible supporting evidence of the stressor.

Allow the veteran the opportunity to furnish this type of evidence or indicate its potential sources.

e. Interpretation of Secondary Evidence In personal trauma claims, interpretation of secondary evidence by a clinician may be required, especially if the claim involves behavioral changes.

Evidence that supports such behavioral changes may require

• interpretation in relationship to the medical diagnosis, or

• an opinion by an appropriate medical or mental health professional as to whether it indicates that personal trauma occurred.

Reference: For more information on VA’s responsibility to obtain secondary evidence needed to corroborate a personal trauma claim, see Patton v. West, 12 Vet. App. 272 (1999).

f. Obtaining Evidence For more information on obtaining service records, medical treatment records, and evidence of personal trauma, see M21-1MR, Part IV, Subpart ii, 1.D.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MT,

I am sorry that you went through that in the military. Unfortunately, from the way your post reads, the PTSD evaluation was based on the actual assualt. The proof you have concerns the harrassment. If the PTSD was based on that harrassment, there would have been an entirely different outcome. We all know that the two (assualt and harrassment) are connected based on your statements, but proof is needed. I know that you were in shcok after the assault, I had a daughter who was raped and she was in shock and did not know what to do, until her uspervisor at work noticed she was "off" and when talking to her discovered what had happened and sent her to the hospital.

Edited by huskerfanfl

Tim

Vet and proud of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Founder

here is link to several posts dealing with mst http://www.google.com/custom?hl=en&lr=...q=sexual+trauma

here is a link to a variety of sites some of which maybe useful to you http://www.hadit.com/searchresults.htm?cx=...FORID%3A11#1396

Tbird
 

Founder HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran LLC - Founded Jan 20, 1997

 

HadIt.com Veteran To Veteran | Community Forum | RallyPointFaceBook | LinkedInAbout Me

 

Time Dedicated to HadIt.com Veterans and my brothers and sisters: 65,700 - 109,500 Hours Over Thirty Years

 

diary-a-mad-sailor-signature-banner.png

I am writing my memoirs and would love it if you could help a shipmate out and look at it.

I've had a few challenges, perhaps the same as you. I relate them here to demonstrate that we can learn, overcome, and find purpose in life.

The stories can be harrowing to read; they were challenging to live. Remember that each story taught me something I would need once I found my purpose, and my purpose was and is HadIt.com Veterans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It also helps to study BVA decisions to as to sexual harrassment claims to understand the rationale of the VA.

http://www.va.gov/vetapp06/files4/0624342.txt

This claim was denied and the BVA stated:

"In addition, although the Board has searched the

claims file for the various types of evidence which may be

evidence of sexual harassment, such as evidence of behavioral

changes or difficulties in service, there is no objective

evidence dated contemporaneously with service to support her

claim. The Board therefore finds that this report does not

outweigh the evidence, particularly the lack of corroborating

evidence of inservice stressor, which shows that the veteran

does not have PTSD due to sexual harassment or assault during

her service."

Evidence contemporaneous with service was lacking- this could be any hosp report, any HIV test, any letters home, any immediate reaction that was documented in the veteran's personnel or medical records-

As Huskerfanfls post shows this woman exhibited behavior that was not normal for her,after the sexual incident, and it was witnessed.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been trying to get treatment forMST for several years now. I already have a 70% rating for major depressive disorder.....but heck!!! I can't even get treatment for that!!

Good luck in getting your claim for PTSD granted. According to their own standards, you should have the VA dead to rights, but sadly VA seems to play by thier own rules only when it suits their purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been trying to get treatment forMST for several years now. I already have a 70% rating for major depressive disorder.....but heck!!! I can't even get treatment for that!!

Good luck in getting your claim for PTSD granted. According to their own standards, you should have the VA dead to rights, but sadly VA seems to play by thier own rules only when it suits their purpose.

Thank You...and I am sorry to hear that even after all the stuff I am sure you went through to get your rating that they are still putting up walls for you to get the needed support you need and deserve it is criminal...I will keep you in my prayers goofycow...that things will be put right for you.

God Speed

MT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use