Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
WBrennan

VA did C&P and now sent to VES for second C&P?

Question

Good rainy morning everyone!

I have a claim in for an ankle problem secondary to my SC left knee.  My ankle currently suffers from Ankle Impingement due to repeated sprains and in my MEPS exam it was noted that I had previously broken my ankle.  My knee condition causes me to favor my right ankle.  My MD and VA noted some limited ROM as well as instability.  The doctor at the VA noted her opinion that it is LESS likely than not (<50%) that it is secondary to my left knee SC disability.  I am kinda ok with that. Weeks later my claim moves to Pending Decision Approval for a few days then back to Review of Evidence then back to Gathering of Evidence. Weird but whatever.  Then I see they want to schedule a C&P exam (Still have two open claims) and I figure it was related to that.  It turns out, the VA is sending me to VES for a second C&P exam.  I think they are requesting their medical opinion.  This is where I am baffled.  I thought since the VA Doc said LESS likely than not it would go quickly to a denial.  I am confused about the second C&P for my ankle.  The VA paperwork for the C&P exam is well documented and accurate.  Thoughts on this? Good? Bad? Just getting support for the denial?  thanks!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Without seeing everything it is hard to tell. If you confirmed that the next C&P is for the ankle, then they want to confirm that 1) the last examination didn't miss something or 2) the last examiner's exam is for some reason is suspect. That would be my guess. You don't get 2 exams for the same thing in a short period of time unless there is something missing. Could be a good thing. Maybe, the first examiner did have all your med files, x-rays, mri's, etc. and they want to see it again. Could be ok. Maybe. Hope so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
11 hours ago, WBrennan said:

Thoughts on this? Good? Bad? Just getting support for the denial?  thanks!!

Here is the salient takeaway. You NEED to get the DBQ, the Code Sheet, the Dr;s Notes AND most importantly the Letters/emails between the Examining company/Dr and VA. for both the first and that Second C&P on your problem.

Va will probably fight you on much of that, but those Letters and Code Sheets are key and the Notes, which they must take, are essential to any response you have to the award or denial.

I am fighting a similar battle. Long story but relevant part is VA sent me to do another C&P for Vertigo. I had also put in a New and Material Claim on Hearing Loss. They denied it based on the evidence, in their words, was neither New or Material.

Right after that i got that denial,  I had the first part of the Vertigo C&P and in that process they include a Hearing Test but the audiologist does not do a C&P. Since I did not know that I told her that the VA had screwed up years before and denied me for hearing loss incorrectly and showed her the record...

all of a sudden after the seeing the OTO and him doing his C&P. I get a notice to go to an Audiology C&P.

It was an hour plus drive without traffic. DERP.... I went in handed her the papers said I am not sure why I am here but this is the evidence they screwed up that initial denial. She looked at me and almost did a face-plant and said. Yep, I get it...we are all done here. Two weeks later my Hearing loss was SC'd. I am now in the process of CUEing the original and the Second denial and filing a NOD on the second denial.

My quest for the EED on the HL rating is on. So is getting my Vertigo rating changed to Menieres' but that is a different topic. The VA in essence CUE'd itself and ordered that "new" Hearing Loss C&P. I need the letters and notes to prove they knew it was cue from years earlier.  They are trying to hide them from me but I will overcome their attempts. I am a nasty bastard when you F with my money and getting that stuff SC to an EED means about 100K to me.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

@ Geeky

Have you ever considered  going to a Private state license ENT Specialist  and take your VA Audidology records and ask the specialist to read & comment on them with his impression (in detail) letter after he examines and test your hearing. (for probative evidence in your favor)

The specialist will need to follow the VA Guidelines for VA  S.C. Hearing loss and use the VA CD Maryland CNC Discrimination word test...he can call the VA for  the CNC Maryland C.D. or you can purchase it at your VAMC  for a small fee 6.00 bucks I think?

He needs to make sure to follow all the VA Guidelines and add that his hearing testing equipment is calibrated every 3 months and will offer the calibration companies name and copy of the last calabreation.

also the Dr will need to give his expert credentials and years of experience and his business hours

And add his phone # if they need to talk to him and his hours of open practice Monday thru Friday  9:00am to 5:00pm

you get all that   they don't come any better.

This should cover service connection and make it easy on them to give you a rating  and back date to accommodate your EED.

You can do this at R.O. Level ask for a R.O. DRO Hearing  with a rating specialist present at your hearing  between the two the DRO and the Rating specialist   it should go over in your favor.

Reason for this is  If there are any decreptices  the VA will use a specialist over a VA MD  or Audiologist every time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
2 hours ago, Buck52 said:

Have you ever considered  going to a Private state license ENT Specialist

@Buck52

The situation is convoluted and I chose not to get into the minutia in this thread. But to answer your question, at this point I don't need a Private ENT. I have been SC'd for HL but only this year. Thanks for the suggestion though. If this were "normal" a private IMO/IME would be appropriate.

My challenge in relation to the Hearing Loss is to get the EED to back when they first Denied SC, or when they Denied under my claim of New and Material Evidence in 2018.

What happened was the original C&P Doctor explicitly stated she only used my first 4 years of service when she rated my HL as not being SC. The damage however shows up in all my other enlistments that she literally and explicitly said she did not look at.

That same award gave me 70% for PTSD and 10% for Tinnitus. All of which were documented in my STRs starting in year 5 of my service. That means the VA had my full STRs in their possession at the time the Raters got the Audiologist C&P and did not catch that she only used 4 years.

In the section of the Award letter that denied the HL, the raters included all the numbers from my C&P EXCEPT the flat out statement that she only used 4 years of my record.

By not telling me that time period, and not having a living VSO or any idea that we had C-Files or could get them, I figured I was just not deaf enough to qualify and forgot about it until 2018..

So for this part of the problem I am filing a NOD for the EED and filing a CUE against the original award. One of them will shake out that EED for me.

But of course, as with all things involving the VA and my situation, nothing is simple or uncomplicated.

I spent 20 years getting the VA and Navy to acknowledge that I actually served. It had to do with the nature of my service. Every time I showed up at a VAMC or VARO with my DD-214 in hand they would deny they could prove my service. I went to 12 different VARO/VAMC combos before I finally found a way to force them to actually to use the right process to verify my particular service record.

They still cannot see parts of it that relate to my conditions.

When they did acknowledge me and accept my claim for compensation for PTSD, Tinnitus and Hearing loss, they also, on their own, sent me for testing for Vertigo & Sleep Apnea. They did an MRI, a VNG, and a sleep study.

They issued a CPAP for the SA. I have moderate to severe OSA.

These were all done BEFORE the C&P's for the stated claims were conducted. So the results were in my VBMS records when they rated me for PTSD, Tinnitus, and Denied SC for Hearing Loss. The VAMC New Orleans claims to have lost the SA records, The MRI records and the VNG records. Yet my C-FILE has hundreds of entries referencing all three.

What they did not do is tell me I had potential claims for those items; the Award letters were silent on SA & Vertigo.

At this time the Universe conspired to make my life more difficult. The VSO I had found that was able to get them to accept me was dying/died from Pancreatic Cancer and the American Legion did not replace him or have me go elsewhere.

As someone who did not know the processes I just let things go and this is my fault. I was just exhausted dealing with the VA and I had a life and business to run.

So with all that in mind.

The plan of attack for me is to first get the EED for the HL. Even at 0% the SC condition is lawfully mine at the EED.

I now have a 30% rating for the Vertigo. On that claim, I have two stages to complete, one is the NOD because the OTO got it wrong. I should be rated for Meniere's disease based on my VA medical records and my private records.

I should have a rating for a TBI as documented in my STR's and supported by my Empty Sella which they know about from the MRI they ran for Vertigo. They know my Vertigo is not from organic tumors or physical damage to the nerves and other visible parts of the ear. They know my HL is not organic or from visible damage to the ears.

I have just had another VNG and that buttresses the reality the cause of the vertigo is not visibly organic.

That leaves a diagnosis of Meniere's as the appropriate diagnosis.

when that changes I will attack that for an EED.

If I get that EED, that bumps my initial rating to 100% +70% for those two items alone.

Add in the SA which I am going to file a claim for now and then ask for an EED, would put me at 100+70+50 from years ago.

That would put me as SC for 100% + SMC(s) from way back when and that means over 100k in retro pay.

In the alternative, even if I don't get the Meniere's EED, but I do get the SC for SA I will be SMC(s) now and then fight for the EED on the SA.

None of these claims is about interpreting medical diagnosis or opinion. They are all about the VA not doing a thorough review of my records and doing their Duty to Notify, Assist and even Infer. I am on solid 4.6 grounds for all of them. I also have a First Court of Appeals decision that states my SC is a property right once granted. That gives me the standing to fight in the Courts outside the VA system.

I will be filing challenges to the Doctor's competency and to Challenge to Administrative Process Presumptions to preserve them for use at Higher Courts if need be.

That is more than anyone wanted to know...sorry, just trying to fill in the gaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Roger that Geeky, sorry to hear all about that  but your on the right track keep up the fight!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 6 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines