Jump to content


  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
SPO

Points to address in IMO

Question

So my doctor seems to up for writing an IMO for my appeal. It seems he didn’t take to kindly to the VA denying his diagnosis.  

Can anyone help me out with the points he will need to address based on my denial. As a point of interest the c&p examiner was a nurse practitioner specializing in gerontology. My doc’s specialization is good to diagnose and treat my conditions. Check out this denial and let me know what he needs to write so he I can make sure he gets everything.  FYI this is just one of multiple joints that were denied.

Service connection for psoriatic arthritis of the left shoulder is not established. Service connection may only be granted for a chronic disability which began in military service or was caused by some event or experience in service.

The evidence does not show an event, disease or injury in service. (38 CFR 3.303, 38 CFR 3 .30~). Your service treatment records do not contain complaints, treatment, or diagnosis for this condition. The VA medical opinion found no persistent disability. 

The medical opinion we received from the VA contract examination was more persuasive than your private physician's opinion because it was based on an in-person examination and a thorough review of your relevant military and /or personal history and contained a more convincing rationale. (38 CFR 4.6) The evidence does not show that your condition resulted from, or was aggravated by, a service-connected disability. (38 CFR 3.303, 38 CFR 3.304) The evidence does not show that your disease developed to a compensable degree within the specified time period after release from service to qualify for the presumption of service connection. (38 CFR 3.307, 38 CFR 3.309)

 The VA contract medical opinion dated December 15, 2018, was not based on a review of your claims file or an in-person examination. 

Service connection for psoriatic arthritis of the left shoulder is denied because the medical evidence of record fails to show that this disability has been clinically diagnosed. (38 cfr 3.303)"

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

First the doctor needs to state that he reviewed all of your service records and current medical records.  He must now make a point to show that your current disability is directly as a result of you service connected disability.  If I remember your denial you posted previously the VA did SC psoriasis.  Now your doctor must show that medical literature supports his contention that the arthritis is a direct result of your psoriasis.

This IMO is not for arthritis but it might give your doctor a roadmap.  Yes it was a winner.

I have again reviewed the medical records and also new medical references which explain neuropathy after a heat stroke.  The studies have shown that the decreased body temperature in some cases cause a metabolic abnormality in the peripheral nerve.  Because this is the most sensitive nerve or the longest nerve, this would cause changes in the leg first.  This would result in numbness and also moderate generalized weakness.  Because of the nerve damage, oftentimes the occiput structure and also ambulation is abnormal, which can result in actually chronic leg pain from the secondary arthritic changes.  In this case I do think that this does explain why he is having some in his leg.

Peripheral neuropathy is cause by many illnesses. However, the most common illness that causes actually generalized peripheral neuropathy is secondary to metabolic changes with can affect the overall metabolism of the nerve resulting in chronic death of the nerve fiber itself.  This is often slow and takes many years.  The most common cause would be diabetes; however, the next most common cause would be other metabolic factors.  The only other metabolic factor which he has been exposed to is his episode of hyperthermia.  Hyperthermia is on of the causes of actually generalized peripheral neuropathy.  This heated recent nerve which was cause by a "heat stroke" the he had while in the military while he was employed.

My rational is based on medical literature which explains peripheral neuropathy causes, one of which is actually hyperthermia.  I investigated this and it varies from the VA impression, since it doe not appear they have done any specific neurological treatment. 

 

 

Edited by vetquest
spelling
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Since they said I didn't have a diagnosis, should he also include his diagnosis for me?  I believe I've read on other threads that he should give his medical background, basically why he is qualified to opine, correct?  Also, they are saying there was no record in my SMR.  This is because it didn't develop until later.  Does this need to be addressed as well? 

I claimed some of these joint issues in my original VA claim back in 2009, but before i was diagnosed with arthritis and they were denied. I claimed them again this time with a diagnosis. Are these going to be harder to overcome? is there anything I can have the doc include to support them this time around?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Ok. So my doc is backing off doing an IMO.  He said go to the rheumatologist for an opinion.  Would a dbq from the rheumatologist be good enough if he says he’s reviewed my smr, c-file, and civilian records? Or do I need a full opinion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I do not believe the doctor has to recite his full credentials to write a good IMO.  My IMO's were done by a neurologist that just showed he was qualified to make a medical opinion, ie, he was a neurologist in practice.  If you go to a rheumatologist and ask for an opinion at your first appointment they, like most doctors, will balk.  I would try to go back to your other doctor if you still can get him to write his opinion of your case adding that he has read all of your records, just make sure he has them so he is telling the truth.  If he is still unwilling try the rheumatologist and see what they say.  Otherwise you will find yourself in the unenviable position of getting a paid IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I forgot to ask for their credentials once they wrote the IMOs up, I downloaded the credentials down from the website I paid for one IMO and the other was done for free, the free one was a little light in the info but it did cover the basics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Peggy toll free 1000 last week, told me that, my claim or case BVA Granted is at the RO waiting on someone to sign off ,She said your in step 5 going into step 6 . That's good, right.?
      • 6 replies
    • I took a look at your documents and am trying to interpret what happened. A summary of what happened would have helped, but I hope I am interpreting your intentions correctly:


      2003 asthma denied because they said you didn't have 'chronic' asthma diagnosis


      2018 Asthma/COPD granted 30% effective Feb 2015 based on FEV-1 of 60% and inhalational anti-inflamatory medication.

      "...granted SC for your asthma with COPD w/dypsnea because your STRs show you were diagnosed with asthma during your military service in 1995.


      First, check the date of your 2018 award letter. If it is WITHIN one year, file a notice of disagreement about the effective date. 

      If it is AFTER one year, that means your claim has became final. If you would like to try to get an earlier effective date, then CUE or new and material evidence are possible avenues. 

       

      I assume your 2003 denial was due to not finding "chronic" or continued symptoms noted per 38 CFR 3.303(b). In 2013, the Federal Circuit court (Walker v. Shinseki) changed they way they use the term "chronic" and requires the VA to use 3.303(a) for anything not listed under 3.307 and 3.309. You probably had a nexus and benefit of the doubt on your side when you won SC.

      It might be possible for you to CUE the effective date back to 2003 or earlier. You'll need to familiarize yourself with the restrictions of CUE. It has to be based on the evidence in the record and laws in effect at the time the decision was made. Avoid trying to argue on how they weighed a decision, but instead focus on the evidence/laws to prove they were not followed or the evidence was never considered. It's an uphill fight. I would start by recommending you look carefully at your service treatment records and locate every instance where you reported breathing issues, asthma diagnosis, or respiratory treatment (albuterol, steroids, etc...). CUE is not easy and it helps to do your homework before you file.

      Another option would be to file for an increased rating, but to do that you would need to meet the criteria for 60%. If you don't meet criteria for a 60% rating, just ensure you still meet the criteria for 30% (using daily inhaled steroid inhalers is adequate) because they are likely to deny your request for increase. You could attempt to request an earlier effective date that way.

       

      Does this help?
    • Thanks for that. So do you have a specific answer or experience with it bouncing between the two?
    • Tinnitus comes in two forms: subjective and objective. In subjective tinnitus, only the sufferer will hear the ringing in their own ears. In objective tinnitus, the sound can be heard by a doctor who is examining the ear canals. Objective tinnitus is extremely rare, while subjective tinnitus is by far the most common form of the disorder.

      The sounds of tinnitus may vary with the person experiencing it. Some will hear a ringing, while others will hear a buzzing. At times people may hear a chirping or whistling sound. These sounds may be constant or intermittent. They may also vary in volume and are generally more obtrusive when the sufferer is in a quiet environment. Many tinnitus sufferers find their symptoms are at their worst when they’re trying to fall asleep.

      ...................Buck
        • Like
    • Precedent Setting CAVC cases cited in the M21-1
      A couple months back before I received my decision I started preparing for the appeal I knew I would be filing.  That is how little faith I had in the VA caring about we the veteran. 

      One of the things I did is I went through the entire M21-1 and documented every CAVC precedent case that the VA cited. I did this because I wanted to see what the rater was seeing.  I could not understand for the life of me why so many obviously bad decisions were being handed down.  I think the bottom line is that the wrong type of people are hired as raters.  I think raters should have some kind of legal background.  They do not need to be lawyers but I think paralegals would be a good idea.

      There have been more than 3500 precedent setting decisions from the CAVC since 1989.  Now we need to concede that all of them are not favorable to the veteran but I have learned that in a lot of cases even though the veteran lost a case it some rules were established that assisted other veterans.

      The document I created has about 200 or so decisions cited in the M21-1.   Considering the fact that there are more than 3500 precedent cases out there I think it is safe to assume the VA purposely left out decisions that would make it almost impossible to deny veteran claims.  Case in point. I know of 14 precedent setting decisions that state the VA cannot ignore or give no weight to outside doctors without providing valid medical reasons as to why.  Most of these decision are not cited by the M21.

      It is important that we do our due diligence to make sure we do not get screwed.  I think the M21-1 is incomplete because there is too much information we veterans are finding on our own to get the benefits we deserve

      M21-1 Precedent setting decisions .docx
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 5 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines