Jump to content
  • veteranscrisisline-badge-chat-1.gif

  • Advertisemnt

  • Trouble Remembering? This helped me.

    I have memory problems and as some of you may know I highly recommend Evernote and have for years. Though I've found that writing helps me remember more. I ran across Tom's videos on youtube, I'm a bit geeky and I also use an IPad so if you take notes on your IPad or you are thinking of going paperless check it out. I'm really happy with it, I use it with a program called Noteshelf 2.

    Click here to purchase your digital journal. HadIt.com receives a commission on each purchase.

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • VA Watchdog

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Points to address in IMO


So my doctor seems to up for writing an IMO for my appeal. It seems he didn’t take to kindly to the VA denying his diagnosis.  

Can anyone help me out with the points he will need to address based on my denial. As a point of interest the c&p examiner was a nurse practitioner specializing in gerontology. My doc’s specialization is good to diagnose and treat my conditions. Check out this denial and let me know what he needs to write so he I can make sure he gets everything.  FYI this is just one of multiple joints that were denied.

Service connection for psoriatic arthritis of the left shoulder is not established. Service connection may only be granted for a chronic disability which began in military service or was caused by some event or experience in service.

The evidence does not show an event, disease or injury in service. (38 CFR 3.303, 38 CFR 3 .30~). Your service treatment records do not contain complaints, treatment, or diagnosis for this condition. The VA medical opinion found no persistent disability. 

The medical opinion we received from the VA contract examination was more persuasive than your private physician's opinion because it was based on an in-person examination and a thorough review of your relevant military and /or personal history and contained a more convincing rationale. (38 CFR 4.6) The evidence does not show that your condition resulted from, or was aggravated by, a service-connected disability. (38 CFR 3.303, 38 CFR 3.304) The evidence does not show that your disease developed to a compensable degree within the specified time period after release from service to qualify for the presumption of service connection. (38 CFR 3.307, 38 CFR 3.309)

 The VA contract medical opinion dated December 15, 2018, was not based on a review of your claims file or an in-person examination. 

Service connection for psoriatic arthritis of the left shoulder is denied because the medical evidence of record fails to show that this disability has been clinically diagnosed. (38 cfr 3.303)"


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

First the doctor needs to state that he reviewed all of your service records and current medical records.  He must now make a point to show that your current disability is directly as a result of you service connected disability.  If I remember your denial you posted previously the VA did SC psoriasis.  Now your doctor must show that medical literature supports his contention that the arthritis is a direct result of your psoriasis.

This IMO is not for arthritis but it might give your doctor a roadmap.  Yes it was a winner.

I have again reviewed the medical records and also new medical references which explain neuropathy after a heat stroke.  The studies have shown that the decreased body temperature in some cases cause a metabolic abnormality in the peripheral nerve.  Because this is the most sensitive nerve or the longest nerve, this would cause changes in the leg first.  This would result in numbness and also moderate generalized weakness.  Because of the nerve damage, oftentimes the occiput structure and also ambulation is abnormal, which can result in actually chronic leg pain from the secondary arthritic changes.  In this case I do think that this does explain why he is having some in his leg.

Peripheral neuropathy is cause by many illnesses. However, the most common illness that causes actually generalized peripheral neuropathy is secondary to metabolic changes with can affect the overall metabolism of the nerve resulting in chronic death of the nerve fiber itself.  This is often slow and takes many years.  The most common cause would be diabetes; however, the next most common cause would be other metabolic factors.  The only other metabolic factor which he has been exposed to is his episode of hyperthermia.  Hyperthermia is on of the causes of actually generalized peripheral neuropathy.  This heated recent nerve which was cause by a "heat stroke" the he had while in the military while he was employed.

My rational is based on medical literature which explains peripheral neuropathy causes, one of which is actually hyperthermia.  I investigated this and it varies from the VA impression, since it doe not appear they have done any specific neurological treatment. 



Edited by vetquest
  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Since they said I didn't have a diagnosis, should he also include his diagnosis for me?  I believe I've read on other threads that he should give his medical background, basically why he is qualified to opine, correct?  Also, they are saying there was no record in my SMR.  This is because it didn't develop until later.  Does this need to be addressed as well? 

I claimed some of these joint issues in my original VA claim back in 2009, but before i was diagnosed with arthritis and they were denied. I claimed them again this time with a diagnosis. Are these going to be harder to overcome? is there anything I can have the doc include to support them this time around?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

Ok. So my doc is backing off doing an IMO.  He said go to the rheumatologist for an opinion.  Would a dbq from the rheumatologist be good enough if he says he’s reviewed my smr, c-file, and civilian records? Or do I need a full opinion?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I do not believe the doctor has to recite his full credentials to write a good IMO.  My IMO's were done by a neurologist that just showed he was qualified to make a medical opinion, ie, he was a neurologist in practice.  If you go to a rheumatologist and ask for an opinion at your first appointment they, like most doctors, will balk.  I would try to go back to your other doctor if you still can get him to write his opinion of your case adding that he has read all of your records, just make sure he has them so he is telling the truth.  If he is still unwilling try the rheumatologist and see what they say.  Otherwise you will find yourself in the unenviable position of getting a paid IMO.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

I forgot to ask for their credentials once they wrote the IMOs up, I downloaded the credentials down from the website I paid for one IMO and the other was done for free, the free one was a little light in the info but it did cover the basics.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Our picks

    • Rating "Protections"
      The VA has several regulations governing various levels of "protection". The terms "permanent", "protection", and "total" are misnomers due to the various ways the VA has defined them.

      Here is some information on VA ratings protection (but the word "protection" has a different meaning to the VA). The exception to these rules is if they can prove fraud.

      5 years

      The key part to remember about the 5 year rule is found 3.327(a) indicating that these are guidelines which are not necessarily set in stone. The key takeaway for most veterans is reduction should not occur if there has not been material improvement over 5+ years or if the veteran is over the age of 55.


      10 years

      In brief, ratings in effect for 10 years cannot have service connection severed.


      20 years

      In brief, a disability rated for 20 years cannot be reduced below the lowest rating percentage it has held for the previous 20 years.








      Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a professional representative. The VA updates their regulations from time to time, so this information may become outdated.
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 7 replies
    • Everything Veterans Affairs does with your service connected disability compensation claim, is governed by law. You may want to bookmark this page as a reference as you proceed with your claim.

      It can be a bit daunting. Just remember the U.S.C. is the law, the C.F.R. is how they interpret the law and last but certainly not least is the V.A. adjudication manuals that is how they apply the law. The section of the law that covers the veterans benefits is Title 38 in the U.S.C. in the C.F.R. is usually written 38 C.F.R. or something similar.

      It's helpful to understand how statutes, regulations, and VA directives such as the VA’s Adjudication Procedures Manual, the M21-1MR (Manual M21-1MR.) are related. Of these three sources of law, the statute, written by Congress, is the highest form. The statute that governs veterans’ benefits is found in Title 38 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). The VA writes regulations to carry out the laws written by Congress; these are found in Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The VA’s internal instructions for adjudicating claims are contained in the Manual M21-1MR. VA regulations may not conflict with any statute; the manual’s provisions may not conflict with either statute or regulations. If they do, the Court has the power to invalidate them.


      U.S.C. United States Code United States Code is the law and the U.S.C. is the governments official copy of the code.

      U.S.C.A. United States Code Annotated U.S.C.A. contain everything that is printed in the official U.S. Code but also include annotations to case law relevant to the particular statute.

      C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations The C.F.R. is the interpretation of the law

      VA M-21 Compensation and Pension Manual

      VA M-21-4 C & P Procedures

      VA M28-3 Vocational Rehabilitation

      VA M29-1 VBA Insurance Manual
      • 0 replies
    • HadIt.com Branded 11oz Coffee Mug for sale
      11oz Coffee Mug with HadIt.com Logo and Motto $12
      • 0 replies
    • Show your support with HadIt.com logo items. Only a few to start, t-shirts and ball caps coming https://hadit.com/shop/ Can holder, Coffee Mugs and Notebook currently come take a look and check back https://hadit.com/shop/

      • 0 replies
    • I was unable to find a reply box to your post.

      We have a full Agent Orange forum here.

      Many veterans (and even their survivors) have succeeded in getting a disability, not on the presumptive list, service connected due to their proven exposure to AO.

      Also Secretary Wilkie is considering a few new presumptives, but we have no idea if  he will even add any to the list.

      I wrote to him making a strong argument, as  to the potential for HBP to be added, as well as ischemic stroke and have prepared a personal claim based on the same report a veteran used at the BVA, who also had a strong IMO/IME, and the BVA recently granted his HBP as due to his exposure to AO in Vietnam.

      Most veterans with HBP were deemed as having "essential" - a medical term for no know cause- now we have a cause in Vietnam veterans---AO caused it.


      The report is here:


      On page 8 they found there is "Sufficient" evidence that AO caused HBP in Vietnam veterans.

      The BVA case and this report is also searchable in our AO forum.



      • 0 replies
  • Ads

  • Popular Contributors

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Create New...

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines